CO HB 1134
enactedFairness & Transparency in Municipal Court
Colorado · 2026 Regular Session · lower
Subscribe in a feed reader. The feed covers recorded actions from the last 30 days; Bill Commons may record an action after it happened at the legislature.
Quick answers
Did CO HB 1134 pass?
Yes. CO HB 1134 has been enacted into law. Latest recorded action (2026-02-04): Introduced In House - Assigned to Judiciary
What is CO HB 1134 about?
The act clarifies that municipal court defendants have a right to counsel and that municipal defense counsel have the same notice requirements, case information, and opportunity to meet with their clients as do state-level defense counsel. Current law prohibits paying indigent municipal defense counsel on a fixed or flat-fee payment structure if the municipality prosecutes domestic violence cases. The act applies the prohibition to all municipalities and allows a flat fee arrangement if the flat fee is the same or higher than a resulting fee based on hourly compensation. Current law requires municipal court proceedings to be open to public observation. The act requires virtual observation for all in-custody proceedings and prompt resolution of municipal cases.(Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
Who sponsors CO HB 1134?
K. Wallace, D. Roberts, N. Hinrichsen and 12 others are the primary sponsors of CO HB 1134, joined by 24 cosponsors.
Description
The act clarifies that municipal court defendants have a right to counsel and that municipal defense counsel have the same notice requirements, case information, and opportunity to meet with their clients as do state-level defense counsel. Current law prohibits paying indigent municipal defense counsel on a fixed or flat-fee payment structure if the municipality prosecutes domestic violence cases. The act applies the prohibition to all municipalities and allows a flat fee arrangement if the flat fee is the same or higher than a resulting fee based on hourly compensation. Current law requires municipal court proceedings to be open to public observation. The act requires virtual observation for all in-custody proceedings and prompt resolution of municipal cases.(Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
- Introduced
- 2026-02-04
- Latest action
- 2026-02-04 — Introduced In House - Assigned to Judiciary
- Bill type
- bill
- Last updated
- —
Subjects
Sponsors
- K. Wallacesponsor
- D. Robertssponsor
- N. Hinrichsensponsor
- J. Gonzalessponsor
- J. Colemansponsor
- Y. Zokaiesponsor
- L. Gilchristsponsor
- L. Garcíasponsor
- C. Cliffordsponsor
- M. Cartersponsor
- J. Baconsponsor
- M. Weissmansponsor
- J. Amabilesponsor
- E. Velascosponsor
- J. Mabreysponsor
- J. Josephcosponsor
- J. Jacksoncosponsor
- L. Goldsteincosponsor
- M. Froelichcosponsor
- T. Sullivancosponsor
- R. Englishcosponsor
- S. Camachocosponsor
- K. Browncosponsor
- A. Boeseneckercosponsor
- C. Espenozacosponsor
- K. Mullicacosponsor
- J. Marchmancosponsor
- C. Kippcosponsor
- I. Jodehcosponsor
- T. Exumcosponsor
- S. Woodrowcosponsor
- T. Storycosponsor
- E. Sirotacosponsor
- M. Rutinelcosponsor
- J. Phillipscosponsor
- K. Nguyencosponsor
- K. McCormickcosponsor
- M. Lindsaycosponsor
- S. Liedercosponsor
Committees
Not provided by source.
Action timeline
Newest first
2026-04-27
Governor Signed
executive-signature
2026-04-16
Signed by the Speaker of the House
passage
2026-04-16
Signed by the President of the Senate
passage
2026-04-16
Sent to the Governor
executive-receipt
2026-03-31
Senate Third Reading Passed - No Amendments
passage,reading-3
2026-03-30
Senate Second Reading Passed - No Amendments
reading-2
2026-03-25
Senate Committee on Judiciary Refer Unamended to Senate Committee of the Whole
committee-passage,referral-committee
2026-03-10
Introduced In Senate - Assigned to Judiciary
introduction
2026-03-03
House Third Reading Passed - No Amendments
passage,reading-3
2026-03-02
House Second Reading Special Order - Passed with Amendments - Committee, Floor
2026-02-25
House Committee on Judiciary Refer Amended to House Committee of the Whole
committee-passage,referral-committee
2026-02-04
Introduced In House - Assigned to Judiciary
introduction
Versions
Documents
Votes
Refer House Bill 26-1134, as amended, to the Committee of the Whole.
2026-02-25 · pass · 0-0
Member-level votes (11)
- Jennifer Bacon: yes
- Jarvis Caldwell: no
- Chad Clifford: yes
- Cecelia Espenoza: yes
- Ava Flanell: yes
- Lorena Garcia: yes
- Rebecca Keltie: no
- Matt Soper: yes
- Yara Zokaie: yes
- Michael Carter: yes
- Javier Mabrey: yes
Adopt amendment L.001 (Attachment D).
2026-02-25 · pass · 0-0
Refer House Bill 26-1134 to the Committee of the Whole.
2026-03-25 · pass · 0-0
Member-level votes (7)
- John Carson: no
- Lindsey Daugherty: yes
- Nick Hinrichsen: yes
- Katie Wallace: yes
- Lynda Zamora Wilson: no
- Dylan Roberts: excused
- Mike Weissman: yes
BILL
2026-03-31 · pass · 0-0
Member-level votes (36)
- Amabile: yes
- Baisley: no
- Ball: yes
- Benavidez: yes
- Bridges: yes
- Bright: no
- Carson: no
- Catlin: no
- Cutter: yes
- Danielson: yes
- Daugherty: yes
- Exum: yes
- Frizell: no
- Gonzales J.: yes
- Hinrichsen: yes
- Jodeh: yes
- Kipp: yes
- Kirkmeyer: no
- Kolker: yes
- Lindstedt: yes
- Liston: no
- Marchman: yes
- Mullica: yes
- Pelton B.: no
- Pelton R.: no
- Rich: no
- Roberts: yes
- Rodriguez: yes
- Simpson: yes
- Snyder: yes
- Sullivan: yes
- Wallace: yes
- Weissman: yes
- Zamora Wilson: no
- Coleman: yes
- President: yes
Related bills
No related bills recorded for this bill.
Official source
Attribution
Data from openstates_api_sync, retrieved 2026-08-21T21:01:01.173542Z
Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:
Session-wide evidence can include changes to other bills:
Use this data
Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=CO&identifier=HB 1134. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.
Known limitations
- Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
- Committee referrals are not yet captured.
- Some documents have no extracted text yet, so version comparison may be limited.
See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.