Bill Commons

CA SCR 62

enacted

Relative to National Public Works Week.

California · 2025-2026 Regular Session · upper

Follow this bill’s action updates (Atom)

Subscribe in a feed reader. The feed covers recorded actions from the last 30 days; Bill Commons may record an action after it happened at the legislature.

Quick answers

Did CA SCR 62 pass?

Yes. CA SCR 62 has been enacted into law. Latest recorded action (2025-07-03): Chaptered by Secretary of State. Res. Chapter 119, Statutes of 2025.

What is CA SCR 62 about?

This measure would declare the week of May 18, 2025, to May 24, 2025, inclusive, as National Public Works Week in the State of California, and would request that the Governor issue a proclamation calling on the people of the great State of California to observe the week with appropriate programs and educational activities.

Who sponsors CA SCR 62?

Becker is the primary sponsor of CA SCR 62.

Description

This measure would declare the week of May 18, 2025, to May 24, 2025, inclusive, as National Public Works Week in the State of California, and would request that the Governor issue a proclamation calling on the people of the great State of California to observe the week with appropriate programs and educational activities.

Introduced
2025-04-21
Latest action
2025-07-03 — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Res. Chapter 119, Statutes of 2025.
Bill type
concurrent resolution
Last updated
—

Subjects

Sponsors

  • Beckerauthor

Committees

Not provided by source.

Action timeline

Newest first

  1. 2025-07-03

    Chaptered by Secretary of State. Res. Chapter 119, Statutes of 2025.

    became-law

  2. 2025-07-03

    Enrolled and filed with the Secretary of State at 2 p.m.

    executive-receipt

  3. 2025-06-27

    In Senate. Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.

    committee-passage

  4. 2025-06-27

    Read. Adopted. (Ayes 75. Noes 0. Page 2343.) Ordered to the Senate.

    amendment-passage,passage,reading-1

  5. 2025-06-23

    From committee: Be adopted. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (June 23).

    amendment-passage,committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable,passage

  6. 2025-05-29

    Referred to Com. on RLS.

    referral-committee

  7. 2025-05-05

    In Assembly. Held at Desk.

  8. 2025-05-05

    Read. Adopted. (Ayes 38. Noes 0. Page 1010.) Ordered to the Assembly.

    amendment-passage,passage,reading-1

  9. 2025-04-30

    From committee: Ordered to third reading.

    committee-passage,reading-1,reading-3

  10. 2025-04-21

    Introduced. Referred to Com. on RLS.

    introduction,referral-committee

Versions

Documents

Votes

  • 3rd Reading

    2025-05-05 · pass · 38-0

    Member-level votes (40)
    • Jones: yes
    • Arreguín: yes
    • Richardson: yes
    • Gonzalez: yes
    • Grayson: yes
    • Strickland: yes
    • Caballero: yes
    • Dahle: yes
    • Hurtado: yes
    • Allen: yes
    • Archuleta: yes
    • Cervantes: yes
    • McNerney: yes
    • Seyarto: yes
    • Smallwood-Cuevas: yes
    • Rubio: yes
    • Durazo: yes
    • Cabaldon: yes
    • Ochoa Bogh: yes
    • Wahab: yes
    • Blakespear: yes
    • Menjivar: yes
    • Choi: yes
    • Umberg: yes
    • McGuire: yes
    • Pérez: yes
    • Grove: yes
    • Cortese: yes
    • Laird: yes
    • Alvarado-Gil: yes
    • Weber Pierson: yes
    • Valladares: yes
    • Niello: yes
    • Ashby: yes
    • Wiener: yes
    • Limón: yes
    • Becker: yes
    • Stern: yes
    • Reyes: other
    • Padilla: other
  • Be adopted. To Consent Calendar.

    2025-06-23 · pass · 10-0

    Member-level votes (11)
    • Mark González: yes
    • Lackey: yes
    • Pacheco: yes
    • Ahrens: yes
    • Sanchez: yes
    • Patel: yes
    • Flora: yes
    • Irwin: yes
    • Krell: yes
    • Zbur: yes
    • Michelle Rodriguez: other
  • SCR 62 Becker Consent Calendar Second Day

    2025-06-27 · pass · 75-0

    Member-level votes (79)
    • Davies: yes
    • Bryan: yes
    • Jackson: yes
    • Gallagher: yes
    • Patterson: yes
    • Connolly: yes
    • Berman: yes
    • Papan: yes
    • McKinnor: yes
    • Pacheco: yes
    • Ávila Farías: yes
    • Muratsuchi: yes
    • Tangipa: yes
    • Ahrens: yes
    • Castillo: yes
    • Elhawary: yes
    • Sanchez: yes
    • Solache: yes
    • Fong: yes
    • Petrie-Norris: yes
    • Ransom: yes
    • Rivas: yes
    • DeMaio: yes
    • Wicks: yes
    • Kalra: yes
    • Sharp-Collins: yes
    • Rogers: yes
    • Arambula: yes
    • Krell: yes
    • Jeff Gonzalez: yes
    • Ortega: yes
    • Haney: yes
    • Lowenthal: yes
    • Bonta: yes
    • Hoover: yes
    • Schultz: yes
    • Macedo: yes
    • Lee: yes
    • Ramos: yes
    • Alvarez: yes
    • Carrillo: yes
    • Gipson: yes
    • Harabedian: yes
    • Celeste Rodriguez: yes
    • Ward: yes
    • Calderon: yes
    • Dixon: yes
    • Garcia: yes
    • Patel: yes
    • Addis: yes
    • Irwin: yes
    • Quirk-Silva: yes
    • Soria: yes
    • Aguiar-Curry: yes
    • Caloza: yes
    • Bains: yes
    • Ellis: yes
    • Stefani: yes
    • Alanis: yes
    • Ta: yes
    • Michelle Rodriguez: yes
    • Nguyen: yes
    • Zbur: yes
    • Lackey: yes
    • Schiavo: yes
    • Wallis: yes
    • Boerner: yes
    • Chen: yes
    • Wilson: yes
    • Gabriel: yes
    • Bennett: yes
    • Mark González: yes
    • Valencia: yes
    • Hart: yes
    • Hadwick: yes
    • Bauer-Kahan: other
    • Flora: other
    • Blanca Rubio: other
    • Pellerin: other

Related bills

No related bills recorded for this bill.

Official source

Attribution

Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T01:34:27.960412Z

Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:

Session-wide evidence can include changes to other bills:

Use this data

Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=CA&identifier=SCR 62. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.

Known limitations

  • Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
  • Committee referrals are not yet captured.
  • Some documents have no extracted text yet, so version comparison may be limited.

See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.