Bill Commons

CA SB 787

vetoed

Energy: equitable clean energy supply chains and industrial policy in California.

California · 2025-2026 Regular Session · upper

Follow this bill’s action updates (Atom)

Subscribe in a feed reader. The feed covers recorded actions from the last 30 days; Bill Commons may record an action after it happened at the legislature.

Quick answers

Did CA SB 787 pass?

No. CA SB 787 passed the legislature but was vetoed. Latest recorded action (2026-03-02): Veto sustained.

What is CA SB 787 about?

Existing law requires the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission (Energy Commission) to adopt, on a biennial basis, an integrated energy policy report that contains an overview of major energy trends and issues facing the state, including supply, demand, pricing, reliability, efficiency, and impacts on public health and safety, the economy, resources, and the environment. Existing law requires that the report present policy recommendations based on an in-depth and integrated analysis of the most current and pressing energy issues facing the state. This bill would require the Energy Commission, on or before March 1, 2027, to designate a person within the Energy Commission or identify and retain an external candidate to serve as the Senior Counselor on Industrial Policy and Clean Energy Development, and would require the senior counselor to, among other things, convene working groups that focus on certain issues, as provided. The bill would require the Energy Commission, the Governor's Office of Business and Economic Development, the Labor and Workforce Development Agency, the Public Utilities Commission, the Department of General Services, and the office of the Treasurer, on or before March 1, 2027, to enter into a memorandum of understanding on equitable clean energy supply chains and industrial policy in California with specified goals and provisions, as provided. The bill would require the senior counselor to track and coordinate the work under the memorandum of understanding and to prepare an annual report summarizing the key findings and recommendations resulting from that work. The bill would require that the report be presented at a public meeting of the Energy Commission and be published on the Energy Commission's internet website. The bill would establish in the State Treasury the Equitable Clean Energy Supply Chain and Industrial Policy Fund and would, upon appropriation by the Legislature, authorize the moneys in the fund to be expended for purposes of the bill.

Who sponsors CA SB 787?

McNerney is the primary sponsor of CA SB 787, joined by 3 cosponsors.

Description

Existing law requires the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission (Energy Commission) to adopt, on a biennial basis, an integrated energy policy report that contains an overview of major energy trends and issues facing the state, including supply, demand, pricing, reliability, efficiency, and impacts on public health and safety, the economy, resources, and the environment. Existing law requires that the report present policy recommendations based on an in-depth and integrated analysis of the most current and pressing energy issues facing the state. This bill would require the Energy Commission, on or before March 1, 2027, to designate a person within the Energy Commission or identify and retain an external candidate to serve as the Senior Counselor on Industrial Policy and Clean Energy Development, and would require the senior counselor to, among other things, convene working groups that focus on certain issues, as provided. The bill would require the Energy Commission, the Governor's Office of Business and Economic Development, the Labor and Workforce Development Agency, the Public Utilities Commission, the Department of General Services, and the office of the Treasurer, on or before March 1, 2027, to enter into a memorandum of understanding on equitable clean energy supply chains and industrial policy in California with specified goals and provisions, as provided. The bill would require the senior counselor to track and coordinate the work under the memorandum of understanding and to prepare an annual report summarizing the key findings and recommendations resulting from that work. The bill would require that the report be presented at a public meeting of the Energy Commission and be published on the Energy Commission's internet website. The bill would establish in the State Treasury the Equitable Clean Energy Supply Chain and Industrial Policy Fund and would, upon appropriation by the Legislature, authorize the moneys in the fund to be expended for purposes of the bill.

Introduced
2025-02-21
Latest action
2026-03-02 — Veto sustained.
Bill type
bill
Last updated
—

Subjects

Sponsors

  • McNerneyauthor
  • Petrie-Norriscoauthor
  • Ransomcoauthor
  • Zburcoauthor

Committees

Not provided by source.

Action timeline

Newest first

  1. 2026-03-02

    Veto sustained.

  2. 2026-03-02

    Stricken from file.

  3. 2025-10-13

    In Senate. Consideration of Governor's veto pending.

  4. 2025-10-13

    Vetoed by the Governor.

    executive-veto

  5. 2025-09-23

    Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 2 p.m.

    executive-receipt

  6. 2025-09-13

    Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 29. Noes 8. Page 3028.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.

    amendment-passage,committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable

  7. 2025-09-12

    In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.

  8. 2025-09-12

    Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 64. Noes 10. Page 3405.) Ordered to the Senate.

    passage,reading-1,reading-3

  9. 2025-09-05

    Read third time and amended.

    amendment-passage,reading-1,reading-3

  10. 2025-09-05

    Assembly Rule 69(b)(1) suspended.

  11. 2025-09-05

    Ordered to third reading.

    reading-1,reading-3

  12. 2025-09-03

    Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

    reading-1,reading-2,reading-3

  13. 2025-09-02

    Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.

    amendment-passage,reading-1,reading-2

  14. 2025-08-29

    From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 11. Noes 3.) (August 29).

    amendment-passage,committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable

  15. 2025-08-20

    August 20 set for first hearing. Placed on APPR. suspense file.

  16. 2025-07-15

    From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 14. Noes 1.) (July 14). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

    committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable,referral-committee

  17. 2025-07-15

    Coauthors revised.

  18. 2025-07-10

    From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on TRANS. (Ayes 15. Noes 1.) (July 9). Re-referred to Com. on TRANS.

    committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable,referral-committee

  19. 2025-07-10

    Coauthors revised.

  20. 2025-06-26

    From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on U. & E.

    amendment-passage,committee-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee

  21. 2025-06-16

    Referred to Coms. on U. & E. and TRANS.

    referral-committee

  22. 2025-06-03

    In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

    reading-1

  23. 2025-06-02

    Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 28. Noes 10. Page 1397.) Ordered to the Assembly.

    passage,reading-1,reading-3

  24. 2025-05-23

    From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 1. Page 1213.) (May 23).

    committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable

  25. 2025-05-23

    Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

    reading-1,reading-2,reading-3

  26. 2025-05-16

    Set for hearing May 23.

  27. 2025-05-12

    May 12 hearing: Placed on APPR. suspense file.

  28. 2025-05-02

    Set for hearing May 12.

  29. 2025-04-28

    Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

    amendment-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee

  30. 2025-04-24

    From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 14. Noes 2. Page 811.) (April 21).

    amendment-passage,committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable,referral-committee

  31. 2025-04-10

    Set for hearing April 21.

  32. 2025-04-08

    From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on E., U & C.

    amendment-passage,committee-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee

  33. 2025-03-12

    Referred to Com. on E., U & C.

    referral-committee

  34. 2025-02-24

    From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 24.

  35. 2025-02-24

    Read first time.

    reading-1

  36. 2025-02-21

    Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

    introduction,referral-committee

Versions

  • 02/21/25 - Introduced — 2025-02-21Compare
  • 04/08/25 - Amended Senate — 2025-04-08Compare
  • 04/28/25 - Amended Senate — 2025-04-28Compare
  • 06/26/25 - Amended Assembly — 2025-06-26Compare
  • 09/02/25 - Amended Assembly — 2025-09-02Compare
  • 09/05/25 - Amended Assembly — 2025-09-05Compare
  • 09/18/25 - Enrolled — 2025-09-18Compare
  • SB787Compare
  • (document, no version)Compare

Documents

Votes

  • Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to the Committee on [Appropriations]

    2025-04-21 · pass · 14-2

    Member-level votes (17)
    • Becker: yes
    • Allen: yes
    • Gonzalez: yes
    • Grayson: yes
    • Strickland: yes
    • Wahab: yes
    • McNerney: yes
    • Rubio: yes
    • Stern: yes
    • Caballero: yes
    • Limón: yes
    • Ashby: yes
    • Archuleta: yes
    • Arreguín: yes
    • Ochoa Bogh: no
    • Dahle: no
    • Grove: other
  • Placed on suspense file

    2025-05-12 · pass · 7-0

    Member-level votes (7)
    • Wahab: yes
    • Seyarto: yes
    • Grayson: yes
    • Richardson: yes
    • Cabaldon: yes
    • Dahle: yes
    • Caballero: yes
  • Do pass

    2025-05-23 · pass · 5-1

    Member-level votes (7)
    • Caballero: yes
    • Wahab: yes
    • Cabaldon: yes
    • Richardson: yes
    • Grayson: yes
    • Seyarto: no
    • Dahle: other
  • 3rd Reading

    2025-06-02 · pass · 28-10

    Member-level votes (40)
    • Menjivar: yes
    • Pérez: yes
    • Rubio: yes
    • Padilla: yes
    • Cervantes: yes
    • Wahab: yes
    • Smallwood-Cuevas: yes
    • Wiener: yes
    • Grayson: yes
    • Cortese: yes
    • Ashby: yes
    • Gonzalez: yes
    • Arreguín: yes
    • Archuleta: yes
    • Umberg: yes
    • Becker: yes
    • Laird: yes
    • Durazo: yes
    • McGuire: yes
    • Blakespear: yes
    • McNerney: yes
    • Limón: yes
    • Allen: yes
    • Caballero: yes
    • Stern: yes
    • Weber Pierson: yes
    • Cabaldon: yes
    • Richardson: yes
    • Ochoa Bogh: no
    • Niello: no
    • Seyarto: no
    • Valladares: no
    • Alvarado-Gil: no
    • Grove: no
    • Dahle: no
    • Strickland: no
    • Choi: no
    • Jones: no
    • Hurtado: other
    • Reyes: other
  • Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Transportation]

    2025-07-09 · pass · 15-1

    Member-level votes (18)
    • Kalra: yes
    • Calderon: yes
    • Rogers: yes
    • Harabedian: yes
    • Mark González: yes
    • Schiavo: yes
    • Petrie-Norris: yes
    • Hart: yes
    • Irwin: yes
    • Papan: yes
    • Zbur: yes
    • Boerner: yes
    • Chen: yes
    • Davies: yes
    • Schultz: yes
    • Patterson: no
    • Ta: other
    • Wallis: other
  • Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]

    2025-07-14 · pass · 14-1

    Member-level votes (16)
    • Papan: yes
    • Hoover: yes
    • Ward: yes
    • Davies: yes
    • Ransom: yes
    • Wilson: yes
    • Rogers: yes
    • Ahrens: yes
    • Carrillo: yes
    • Lowenthal: yes
    • Aguiar-Curry: yes
    • Jackson: yes
    • Hart: yes
    • Harabedian: yes
    • Macedo: no
    • Lackey: other
  • Do pass as amended.

    2025-08-29 · pass · 11-3

    Member-level votes (15)
    • Elhawary: yes
    • Pellerin: yes
    • Fong: yes
    • Pacheco: yes
    • Calderon: yes
    • Arambula: yes
    • Mark González: yes
    • Wicks: yes
    • Caloza: yes
    • Ahrens: yes
    • Solache: yes
    • Sanchez: no
    • Tangipa: no
    • Dixon: no
    • Ta: other
  • SB 787 McNerney Senate Third Reading By Petrie-Norris

    2025-09-13 · pass · 64-10

    Member-level votes (80)
    • Ahrens: yes
    • Mark González: yes
    • Quirk-Silva: yes
    • Gipson: yes
    • Rogers: yes
    • Addis: yes
    • Ward: yes
    • Haney: yes
    • Hart: yes
    • Fong: yes
    • Calderon: yes
    • Elhawary: yes
    • Wilson: yes
    • Carrillo: yes
    • Bains: yes
    • Ransom: yes
    • Soria: yes
    • Michelle Rodriguez: yes
    • Berman: yes
    • Valencia: yes
    • Wicks: yes
    • Celeste Rodriguez: yes
    • Arambula: yes
    • Connolly: yes
    • Schultz: yes
    • Bauer-Kahan: yes
    • Bennett: yes
    • Papan: yes
    • Schiavo: yes
    • Bonta: yes
    • Ávila Farías: yes
    • Aguiar-Curry: yes
    • Jeff Gonzalez: yes
    • Pacheco: yes
    • Boerner: yes
    • Alvarez: yes
    • Lee: yes
    • Alanis: yes
    • Stefani: yes
    • Caloza: yes
    • Sharp-Collins: yes
    • Nguyen: yes
    • Ortega: yes
    • Solache: yes
    • Lowenthal: yes
    • Blanca Rubio: yes
    • Jackson: yes
    • Bryan: yes
    • Petrie-Norris: yes
    • Harabedian: yes
    • Gabriel: yes
    • Zbur: yes
    • Davies: yes
    • McKinnor: yes
    • Pellerin: yes
    • Muratsuchi: yes
    • Krell: yes
    • Irwin: yes
    • Ramos: yes
    • Patel: yes
    • Kalra: yes
    • Rivas: yes
    • Chen: yes
    • Garcia: yes
    • Johnson: no
    • Dixon: no
    • Hadwick: no
    • Tangipa: no
    • Macedo: no
    • Gallagher: no
    • Sanchez: no
    • Ellis: no
    • Wallis: no
    • DeMaio: no
    • Hoover: other
    • Lackey: other
    • Castillo: other
    • Flora: other
    • Patterson: other
    • Ta: other
  • Unfinished Business SB787 McNerney et al. Concurrence

    2025-09-13 · pass · 29-8

    Member-level votes (40)
    • Richardson: yes
    • Menjivar: yes
    • Pérez: yes
    • Stern: yes
    • Smallwood-Cuevas: yes
    • Wahab: yes
    • Limón: yes
    • Padilla: yes
    • Grayson: yes
    • Caballero: yes
    • Cortese: yes
    • Reyes: yes
    • Hurtado: yes
    • Becker: yes
    • Ashby: yes
    • Allen: yes
    • Laird: yes
    • Weber Pierson: yes
    • McGuire: yes
    • McNerney: yes
    • Archuleta: yes
    • Blakespear: yes
    • Wiener: yes
    • Arreguín: yes
    • Cervantes: yes
    • Rubio: yes
    • Umberg: yes
    • Cabaldon: yes
    • Durazo: yes
    • Niello: no
    • Strickland: no
    • Seyarto: no
    • Jones: no
    • Dahle: no
    • Ochoa Bogh: no
    • Alvarado-Gil: no
    • Grove: no
    • Gonzalez: other
    • Valladares: other
    • Choi: other

Related bills

No related bills recorded for this bill.

Official source

Attribution

Data from openstates_api_sync, retrieved 2026-10-28T10:07:15.144846Z

Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:

Session-wide evidence can include changes to other bills:

Use this data

Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=CA&identifier=SB 787. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.

Known limitations

  • Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
  • Committee referrals are not yet captured.
  • Some documents have no extracted text yet, so version comparison may be limited.

See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.