Bill Commons

CA SB 783

vetoed

Outdoor advertising displays: redevelopment agency project areas.

California · 2025-2026 Regular Session · upper

Follow this bill’s action updates (Atom)

Subscribe in a feed reader. The feed covers recorded actions from the last 30 days; Bill Commons may record an action after it happened at the legislature.

Quick answers

Did CA SB 783 pass?

No. CA SB 783 passed the legislature but was vetoed. Latest recorded action (2026-03-02): Veto sustained.

What is CA SB 783 about?

The Outdoor Advertising Act provides for the regulation by the Department of Transportation of an advertising display, as defined, within view of public highways. The act regulates the placement of an off-premises advertising display along highways that generally advertises business conducted or services rendered or goods produced or sold at a location other than the property where the display is located. The act does not apply to an on-premises advertising display, which generally advertises business conducted, services rendered, or goods produced or sold at the location where the display is located. However, the act authorizes an off-premises advertising display developed as part of and within the boundary limits of a redevelopment agency project, as those boundaries existed on December 29, 2011, to continue to exist and be considered an on-premises display if it meets certain criteria, and authorizes such a display to remain until January 1, 2026. This bill would extend by 3 years, until January 1, 2029, the authorization to remain for an off-premises advertising display developed as part of and within the boundary limits of a redevelopment agency project, as described above.

Who sponsors CA SB 783?

Rubio is the primary sponsor of CA SB 783, joined by 1 cosponsor.

Description

The Outdoor Advertising Act provides for the regulation by the Department of Transportation of an advertising display, as defined, within view of public highways. The act regulates the placement of an off-premises advertising display along highways that generally advertises business conducted or services rendered or goods produced or sold at a location other than the property where the display is located. The act does not apply to an on-premises advertising display, which generally advertises business conducted, services rendered, or goods produced or sold at the location where the display is located. However, the act authorizes an off-premises advertising display developed as part of and within the boundary limits of a redevelopment agency project, as those boundaries existed on December 29, 2011, to continue to exist and be considered an on-premises display if it meets certain criteria, and authorizes such a display to remain until January 1, 2026. This bill would extend by 3 years, until January 1, 2029, the authorization to remain for an off-premises advertising display developed as part of and within the boundary limits of a redevelopment agency project, as described above.

Introduced
2025-02-21
Latest action
2026-03-02 — Veto sustained.
Bill type
bill
Last updated
—

Subjects

Sponsors

  • Rubioauthor
  • Tacoauthor

Committees

Not provided by source.

Action timeline

Newest first

  1. 2026-03-02

    Stricken from file.

  2. 2026-03-02

    Veto sustained.

  3. 2025-10-13

    In Senate. Consideration of Governor's veto pending.

  4. 2025-10-13

    Vetoed by the Governor.

    executive-veto

  5. 2025-09-16

    Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3 p.m.

    executive-receipt

  6. 2025-09-08

    Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 38. Noes 1. Page 2608.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.

    amendment-passage,committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable

  7. 2025-09-04

    In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.

  8. 2025-09-04

    Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 75. Noes 0. Page 2909.) Ordered to the Senate.

    passage,reading-1,reading-3

  9. 2025-09-02

    Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

    reading-1,reading-2,reading-3

  10. 2025-08-29

    From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (August 29).

    committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable

  11. 2025-08-20

    August 20 set for first hearing. Placed on APPR. suspense file.

  12. 2025-07-15

    Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

    amendment-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee

  13. 2025-07-14

    From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 22. Noes 0.) (July 9).

    amendment-passage,committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable,referral-committee

  14. 2025-06-09

    Referred to Com. on G.O.

    referral-committee

  15. 2025-06-04

    In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

    reading-1

  16. 2025-06-03

    Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 39. Noes 0. Page 1463.) Ordered to the Assembly.

    passage,reading-1,reading-3

  17. 2025-04-22

    Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

    reading-1,reading-2,reading-3

  18. 2025-04-21

    From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.

    committee-passage,reading-1,reading-2

  19. 2025-04-10

    Set for hearing April 21.

  20. 2025-04-09

    From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 14. Noes 0. Page 711.) (April 8). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

    committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable,referral-committee

  21. 2025-03-27

    Set for hearing April 8.

  22. 2025-03-12

    Referred to Com. on TRANS.

    referral-committee

  23. 2025-02-24

    From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 24.

  24. 2025-02-24

    Read first time.

    reading-1

  25. 2025-02-21

    Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

    introduction,referral-committee

Versions

Documents

Votes

  • Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]

    2025-04-08 · pass · 14-0

    Member-level votes (15)
    • Cortese: yes
    • Gonzalez: yes
    • Menjivar: yes
    • Blakespear: yes
    • Grayson: yes
    • Richardson: yes
    • Arreguín: yes
    • Strickland: yes
    • Dahle: yes
    • Archuleta: yes
    • Umberg: yes
    • Limón: yes
    • Cervantes: yes
    • Valladares: yes
    • Seyarto: other

  • 3rd Reading

    2025-06-03 · pass · 39-0

    Member-level votes (40)
    • Valladares: yes
    • Gonzalez: yes
    • Choi: yes
    • McNerney: yes
    • Weber Pierson: yes
    • Becker: yes
    • Laird: yes
    • Ashby: yes
    • Richardson: yes
    • Cervantes: yes
    • Padilla: yes
    • Stern: yes
    • Durazo: yes
    • Arreguín: yes
    • Seyarto: yes
    • Niello: yes
    • Cortese: yes
    • Hurtado: yes
    • Pérez: yes
    • Grove: yes
    • Cabaldon: yes
    • Dahle: yes
    • Grayson: yes
    • Allen: yes
    • Menjivar: yes
    • Smallwood-Cuevas: yes
    • Strickland: yes
    • Wiener: yes
    • Archuleta: yes
    • Alvarado-Gil: yes
    • McGuire: yes
    • Blakespear: yes
    • Jones: yes
    • Wahab: yes
    • Limón: yes
    • Caballero: yes
    • Ochoa Bogh: yes
    • Rubio: yes
    • Umberg: yes
    • Reyes: other

  • Do pass as amended and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]

    2025-07-09 · pass · 22-0

    Member-level votes (22)
    • Carrillo: yes
    • Blanca Rubio: yes
    • Macedo: yes
    • Bryan: yes
    • McKinnor: yes
    • Solache: yes
    • Alvarez: yes
    • Nguyen: yes
    • Berman: yes
    • Gabriel: yes
    • Fong: yes
    • Valencia: yes
    • Ta: yes
    • Sanchez: yes
    • Gipson: yes
    • Dixon: yes
    • Ramos: yes
    • Soria: yes
    • Wallis: yes
    • Pacheco: yes
    • Michelle Rodriguez: yes
    • Davies: yes

  • Do pass.

    2025-08-29 · pass · 15-0

    Member-level votes (15)
    • Ta: yes
    • Elhawary: yes
    • Pellerin: yes
    • Fong: yes
    • Pacheco: yes
    • Tangipa: yes
    • Calderon: yes
    • Arambula: yes
    • Dixon: yes
    • Mark González: yes
    • Sanchez: yes
    • Wicks: yes
    • Caloza: yes
    • Ahrens: yes
    • Solache: yes

  • SB 783 Rubio Senate Third Reading By Blanca Rubio

    2025-09-04 · pass · 75-0

    Member-level votes (79)
    • Mark González: yes
    • Alvarez: yes
    • Sharp-Collins: yes
    • Bains: yes
    • Krell: yes
    • Bennett: yes
    • Berman: yes
    • Michelle Rodriguez: yes
    • Ward: yes
    • Nguyen: yes
    • Pellerin: yes
    • Schultz: yes
    • Calderon: yes
    • Boerner: yes
    • Caloza: yes
    • Patterson: yes
    • Rivas: yes
    • Harabedian: yes
    • Pacheco: yes
    • Dixon: yes
    • Hadwick: yes
    • Jackson: yes
    • Aguiar-Curry: yes
    • Ellis: yes
    • Lee: yes
    • Ta: yes
    • Ávila Farías: yes
    • Blanca Rubio: yes
    • Wallis: yes
    • Lackey: yes
    • Soria: yes
    • Castillo: yes
    • Macedo: yes
    • Ramos: yes
    • Flora: yes
    • Sanchez: yes
    • Haney: yes
    • Kalra: yes
    • Fong: yes
    • Patel: yes
    • Ortega: yes
    • Chen: yes
    • Rogers: yes
    • Gallagher: yes
    • Solache: yes
    • Wilson: yes
    • Arambula: yes
    • Quirk-Silva: yes
    • Tangipa: yes
    • Bauer-Kahan: yes
    • Schiavo: yes
    • Elhawary: yes
    • Petrie-Norris: yes
    • Garcia: yes
    • Zbur: yes
    • Connolly: yes
    • McKinnor: yes
    • Carrillo: yes
    • Gipson: yes
    • Lowenthal: yes
    • Bonta: yes
    • Papan: yes
    • Ransom: yes
    • Valencia: yes
    • Addis: yes
    • Wicks: yes
    • Alanis: yes
    • Muratsuchi: yes
    • Stefani: yes
    • Bryan: yes
    • Hoover: yes
    • Jeff Gonzalez: yes
    • Davies: yes
    • Celeste Rodriguez: yes
    • Gabriel: yes
    • Irwin: other
    • DeMaio: other
    • Ahrens: other
    • Hart: other

  • Unfinished Business SB783 Rubio et al. Concurrence

    2025-09-08 · pass · 38-1

    Member-level votes (40)
    • Wahab: yes
    • Niello: yes
    • Jones: yes
    • Laird: yes
    • Choi: yes
    • Rubio: yes
    • McGuire: yes
    • Cortese: yes
    • Ochoa Bogh: yes
    • Richardson: yes
    • Reyes: yes
    • Dahle: yes
    • Valladares: yes
    • Grayson: yes
    • Limón: yes
    • McNerney: yes
    • Wiener: yes
    • Padilla: yes
    • Umberg: yes
    • Hurtado: yes
    • Menjivar: yes
    • Cabaldon: yes
    • Cervantes: yes
    • Weber Pierson: yes
    • Ashby: yes
    • Durazo: yes
    • Seyarto: yes
    • Smallwood-Cuevas: yes
    • Strickland: yes
    • Allen: yes
    • Arreguín: yes
    • Grove: yes
    • Pérez: yes
    • Archuleta: yes
    • Alvarado-Gil: yes
    • Caballero: yes
    • Gonzalez: yes
    • Becker: yes
    • Blakespear: no
    • Stern: other

Related bills

No related bills recorded for this bill.

Official source

http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB783

Attribution

Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T01:34:27.960412Z

Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:

Source and document changesStatus and relationship changes

Session-wide evidence can include changes to other bills:

Bulk imports for this sessionSession dates and activity

Use this data

Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=CA&identifier=SB 783. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.

Known limitations

  • Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
  • Committee referrals are not yet captured.
  • Some documents have no extracted text yet, so version comparison may be limited.

See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.