Bill Commons

CA SB 61

enacted

Private works of improvement: retention payments.

California · 2025-2026 Regular Session · upper

Quick answers

Did CA SB 61 pass?

Yes. CA SB 61 has been enacted into law as of 2025-07-14. Latest recorded action (2025-07-14): Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 49, Statutes of 2025.

What is CA SB 61 about?

Existing law generally governs retention payments withheld with respect to a contract for a private work of improvement, including by requiring an owner that withholds a retention from a direct contractor to, within 45 days after completion of the work of improvement, pay the retention to the contractor. With respect to a contract for a private work of improvement, this bill would limit the amount of a retention payment by, among other things, prohibiting a retention payment withheld from a payment by an owner from the direct contractor, by the direct contractor from any subcontractor, and by a subcontractor from any subcontractor thereunder, from exceeding 5% of the payment, subject to certain exceptions. The bill would require a court to award reasonable attorney's fees to the prevailing party in any action to enforce these provisions.

Who sponsors CA SB 61?

Cortese is the primary sponsor of CA SB 61.

Description

Existing law generally governs retention payments withheld with respect to a contract for a private work of improvement, including by requiring an owner that withholds a retention from a direct contractor to, within 45 days after completion of the work of improvement, pay the retention to the contractor. With respect to a contract for a private work of improvement, this bill would limit the amount of a retention payment by, among other things, prohibiting a retention payment withheld from a payment by an owner from the direct contractor, by the direct contractor from any subcontractor, and by a subcontractor from any subcontractor thereunder, from exceeding 5% of the payment, subject to certain exceptions. The bill would require a court to award reasonable attorney's fees to the prevailing party in any action to enforce these provisions.

Introduced
2025-01-09
Latest action
2025-07-14 — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 49, Statutes of 2025.
Bill type
bill
Last updated

Subjects

Sponsors

  • Corteseauthor

Committees

Not provided by source.

Action timeline

  1. 2025-01-09

    Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

    introduction,reading-1,referral-committee

  2. 2025-01-10

    From printer. May be acted upon on or after February 9.

  3. 2025-01-29

    Referred to Com. on JUD.

    referral-committee

  4. 2025-03-26

    Set for hearing April 8.

  5. 2025-03-26

    From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.

    amendment-passage,committee-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee

  6. 2025-04-09

    From committee: Do pass. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 13. Noes 0. Page 705.) (April 8).

    committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable

  7. 2025-04-10

    Read second time. Ordered to consent calendar.

    reading-1,reading-2

  8. 2025-04-24

    Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 37. Noes 0. Page 887.) Ordered to the Assembly.

    passage,reading-1,reading-3

  9. 2025-04-24

    In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

    reading-1

  10. 2025-05-12

    Referred to Com. on JUD.

    referral-committee

  11. 2025-06-17

    From committee: Do pass. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (June 17).

    committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable

  12. 2025-06-18

    Read second time. Ordered to consent calendar.

    reading-1,reading-2

  13. 2025-06-23

    Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 71. Noes 0. Page 2247.) Ordered to the Senate.

    passage,reading-1,reading-3

  14. 2025-06-23

    In Senate. Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.

    committee-passage

  15. 2025-07-03

    Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 11:15 a.m.

    executive-receipt

  16. 2025-07-14

    Approved by the Governor.

    executive-signature

  17. 2025-07-14

    Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 49, Statutes of 2025.

    became-law

Versions

  • 01/09/25 - Introduced — 2025-01-09Compare
  • 03/26/25 - Amended Senate — 2025-03-26Compare
  • 06/25/25 - Enrolled — 2025-06-25Compare
  • 07/14/25 - Chaptered — 2025-07-14Compare
  • SB61Compare
  • (document, no version)Compare

Documents

Votes

  • Do pass and be ordered to the Consent Calendar

    2025-04-08 · pass · 13-0

    Member-level votes (13)
    • Weber Pierson: yes
    • Ashby: yes
    • Durazo: yes
    • Wahab: yes
    • Wiener: yes
    • Arreguín: yes
    • Laird: yes
    • Umberg: yes
    • Valladares: yes
    • Allen: yes
    • Stern: yes
    • Niello: yes
    • Caballero: yes
  • Consent Calendar 2nd

    2025-04-24 · pass · 37-0

    Member-level votes (40)
    • Weber Pierson: yes
    • Cervantes: yes
    • Richardson: yes
    • Menjivar: yes
    • Seyarto: yes
    • Limón: yes
    • Durazo: yes
    • Niello: yes
    • McGuire: yes
    • Blakespear: yes
    • Laird: yes
    • Cortese: yes
    • Ashby: yes
    • Grayson: yes
    • Strickland: yes
    • Cabaldon: yes
    • Grove: yes
    • Umberg: yes
    • Wiener: yes
    • Allen: yes
    • Wahab: yes
    • McNerney: yes
    • Hurtado: yes
    • Jones: yes
    • Padilla: yes
    • Choi: yes
    • Stern: yes
    • Gonzalez: yes
    • Dahle: yes
    • Arreguín: yes
    • Alvarado-Gil: yes
    • Becker: yes
    • Caballero: yes
    • Valladares: yes
    • Pérez: yes
    • Ochoa Bogh: yes
    • Smallwood-Cuevas: yes
    • Reyes: other
    • Archuleta: other
    • Rubio: other
  • Do pass. To Consent Calendar.

    2025-06-17 · pass · 11-0

    Member-level votes (12)
    • Pacheco: yes
    • Connolly: yes
    • Dixon: yes
    • Zbur: yes
    • Bauer-Kahan: yes
    • Stefani: yes
    • Bryan: yes
    • Kalra: yes
    • Sanchez: yes
    • Harabedian: yes
    • Papan: yes
    • Macedo: other
  • SB 61 Cortese Consent Calendar Second Day

    2025-06-23 · pass · 71-0

    Member-level votes (79)
    • Ávila Farías: yes
    • Petrie-Norris: yes
    • Kalra: yes
    • Hart: yes
    • Wallis: yes
    • Quirk-Silva: yes
    • Gipson: yes
    • Schiavo: yes
    • Boerner: yes
    • Berman: yes
    • Carrillo: yes
    • Garcia: yes
    • Patel: yes
    • Flora: yes
    • Calderon: yes
    • Krell: yes
    • Ramos: yes
    • Rogers: yes
    • DeMaio: yes
    • Elhawary: yes
    • Papan: yes
    • Lowenthal: yes
    • Wicks: yes
    • Fong: yes
    • Bryan: yes
    • Pacheco: yes
    • Schultz: yes
    • Stefani: yes
    • Alanis: yes
    • Tangipa: yes
    • Haney: yes
    • Wilson: yes
    • Bonta: yes
    • Sanchez: yes
    • Mark González: yes
    • Pellerin: yes
    • Lee: yes
    • Muratsuchi: yes
    • Michelle Rodriguez: yes
    • Patterson: yes
    • Lackey: yes
    • Davies: yes
    • Rivas: yes
    • Bennett: yes
    • Blanca Rubio: yes
    • Connolly: yes
    • Irwin: yes
    • Ransom: yes
    • Soria: yes
    • Chen: yes
    • Dixon: yes
    • Aguiar-Curry: yes
    • Jeff Gonzalez: yes
    • Sharp-Collins: yes
    • Hoover: yes
    • Ta: yes
    • Caloza: yes
    • Harabedian: yes
    • Macedo: yes
    • Nguyen: yes
    • Ortega: yes
    • Solache: yes
    • Gallagher: yes
    • Celeste Rodriguez: yes
    • Castillo: yes
    • Gabriel: yes
    • Hadwick: yes
    • Alvarez: yes
    • Valencia: yes
    • Jackson: yes
    • Zbur: yes
    • McKinnor: other
    • Arambula: other
    • Ellis: other
    • Ahrens: other
    • Ward: other
    • Addis: other
    • Bains: other
    • Bauer-Kahan: other

Related bills

No related bills recorded for this bill.

Official source

Attribution

Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T01:34:27.960412Z

Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:

Use this data

Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=CA&identifier=SB 61. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.

Known limitations

  • Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
  • Committee referrals are not yet captured.
  • Some documents have no extracted text yet, so version comparison may be limited.

See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.