Bill Commons

CA SB 580

enacted

Attorney General: immigration enforcement policies.

California · 2025-2026 Regular Session · upper

Follow this bill’s action updates (Atom)

Subscribe in a feed reader. The feed covers recorded actions from the last 30 days; Bill Commons may record an action after it happened at the legislature.

Quick answers

Did CA SB 580 pass?

Yes. CA SB 580 has been enacted into law. Latest recorded action (2025-10-12): Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 670, Statutes of 2025.

What is CA SB 580 about?

Existing law requires the Attorney General to develop model policies limiting assistance with immigration enforcement to the fullest extent possible consistent with federal and state law at public schools, public libraries, courthouses, specified health facilities, shelters, and other specified state agencies. This bill would similarly require the Attorney General, on or before July 1, 2026, and in consultation with appropriate stakeholders, to publish model policies relating to interaction with immigration enforcement, consistent with federal and state law, and to publish guidance and recommendations for databases operated by state and local agencies to limit the availability of information in those databases for the purposes of immigration enforcement, consistent with federal and state law. The bill would require state and local agencies to implement the model policies on or before January 1, 2027, as specified. By imposing new duties on local agencies, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would include findings that changes proposed by this bill address a matter of statewide concern rather than a municipal affair and, therefore, apply to all cities, including charter cities. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.

Who sponsors CA SB 580?

Durazo is the primary sponsor of CA SB 580.

Description

Existing law requires the Attorney General to develop model policies limiting assistance with immigration enforcement to the fullest extent possible consistent with federal and state law at public schools, public libraries, courthouses, specified health facilities, shelters, and other specified state agencies. This bill would similarly require the Attorney General, on or before July 1, 2026, and in consultation with appropriate stakeholders, to publish model policies relating to interaction with immigration enforcement, consistent with federal and state law, and to publish guidance and recommendations for databases operated by state and local agencies to limit the availability of information in those databases for the purposes of immigration enforcement, consistent with federal and state law. The bill would require state and local agencies to implement the model policies on or before January 1, 2027, as specified. By imposing new duties on local agencies, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would include findings that changes proposed by this bill address a matter of statewide concern rather than a municipal affair and, therefore, apply to all cities, including charter cities. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.

Introduced
2025-02-20
Latest action
2025-10-12 — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 670, Statutes of 2025.
Bill type
bill
Last updated
—

Subjects

Sponsors

  • Durazoauthor

Committees

Not provided by source.

Action timeline

Newest first

  1. 2025-10-12

    Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 670, Statutes of 2025.

    became-law

  2. 2025-10-12

    Approved by the Governor.

    executive-signature

  3. 2025-09-22

    Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 11 a.m.

    executive-receipt

  4. 2025-09-10

    Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 30. Noes 10. Page 2805.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.

    amendment-passage,committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable

  5. 2025-09-09

    In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.

  6. 2025-09-09

    Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 58. Noes 19. Page 3087.) Ordered to the Senate.

    passage,reading-1,reading-3

  7. 2025-09-04

    Read third time and amended.

    amendment-passage,reading-1,reading-3

  8. 2025-09-04

    Ordered to third reading.

    reading-1,reading-3

  9. 2025-09-03

    Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

    reading-1,reading-2,reading-3

  10. 2025-09-02

    Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.

    amendment-passage,reading-1,reading-2

  11. 2025-08-29

    From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 11. Noes 4.) (August 29).

    amendment-passage,committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable

  12. 2025-08-20

    August 20 set for first hearing. Placed on APPR. suspense file.

  13. 2025-06-24

    From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 3.) (June 24). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

    committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable,referral-committee

  14. 2025-06-16

    From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.

    amendment-passage,committee-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee

  15. 2025-06-09

    Referred to Com. on JUD.

    referral-committee

  16. 2025-06-03

    In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

    reading-1

  17. 2025-06-02

    Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 28. Noes 10. Page 1376.) Ordered to the Assembly.

    passage,reading-1,reading-3

  18. 2025-05-27

    Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

    reading-1,reading-2,reading-3

  19. 2025-05-23

    From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 1. Page 1205.) (May 23).

    amendment-passage,committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable

  20. 2025-05-23

    Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.

    amendment-passage,reading-1,reading-2

  21. 2025-05-16

    Set for hearing May 23.

  22. 2025-05-12

    May 12 hearing: Placed on APPR. suspense file.

  23. 2025-05-02

    Set for hearing May 12.

  24. 2025-04-30

    From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 968.) (April 30). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

    committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable,referral-committee

  25. 2025-04-23

    From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on L. GOV. (Ayes 11. Noes 1. Page 836.) (April 22). Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.

    committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable,referral-committee

  26. 2025-04-22

    Set for hearing April 30 in L. GOV. pending receipt.

  27. 2025-04-08

    Set for hearing April 22.

  28. 2025-04-02

    Re-referred to Coms. on JUD. and L. GOV.

    referral-committee

  29. 2025-03-26

    From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.

    amendment-passage,committee-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee

  30. 2025-03-05

    Referred to Com. on RLS.

    referral-committee

  31. 2025-02-21

    From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 23.

  32. 2025-02-20

    Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

    introduction,reading-1,referral-committee

Versions

  • 02/20/25 - Introduced — 2025-02-20Compare
  • 03/26/25 - Amended Senate — 2025-03-26Compare
  • 05/23/25 - Amended Senate — 2025-05-23Compare
  • 06/16/25 - Amended Assembly — 2025-06-16Compare
  • 09/02/25 - Amended Assembly — 2025-09-02Compare
  • 09/04/25 - Amended Assembly — 2025-09-04Compare
  • 09/13/25 - Enrolled — 2025-09-13Compare
  • 10/12/25 - Chaptered — 2025-10-12Compare
  • SB580Compare
  • (document, no version)Compare

Documents

Votes

  • Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Local Government]

    2025-04-22 · pass · 11-1

    Member-level votes (13)
    • Allen: yes
    • Wahab: yes
    • Umberg: yes
    • Durazo: yes
    • Caballero: yes
    • Laird: yes
    • Arreguín: yes
    • Stern: yes
    • Weber Pierson: yes
    • Ashby: yes
    • Wiener: yes
    • Niello: no
    • Valladares: other

  • Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]

    2025-04-30 · pass · 5-2

    Member-level votes (7)
    • Arreguín: yes
    • Laird: yes
    • Durazo: yes
    • Cabaldon: yes
    • Wiener: yes
    • Seyarto: no
    • Choi: no

  • Placed on suspense file

    2025-05-12 · pass · 7-0

    Member-level votes (7)
    • Wahab: yes
    • Seyarto: yes
    • Grayson: yes
    • Richardson: yes
    • Cabaldon: yes
    • Dahle: yes
    • Caballero: yes

  • Do pass as amended

    2025-05-23 · pass · 5-1

    Member-level votes (7)
    • Caballero: yes
    • Wahab: yes
    • Cabaldon: yes
    • Richardson: yes
    • Grayson: yes
    • Seyarto: no
    • Dahle: other

  • 3rd Reading

    2025-06-02 · pass · 28-10

    Member-level votes (40)
    • Menjivar: yes
    • Pérez: yes
    • Rubio: yes
    • Padilla: yes
    • Cervantes: yes
    • Wahab: yes
    • Smallwood-Cuevas: yes
    • Wiener: yes
    • Grayson: yes
    • Cortese: yes
    • Ashby: yes
    • Gonzalez: yes
    • Arreguín: yes
    • Archuleta: yes
    • Umberg: yes
    • Becker: yes
    • Laird: yes
    • Durazo: yes
    • McGuire: yes
    • Blakespear: yes
    • McNerney: yes
    • Limón: yes
    • Allen: yes
    • Caballero: yes
    • Stern: yes
    • Weber Pierson: yes
    • Cabaldon: yes
    • Richardson: yes
    • Ochoa Bogh: no
    • Niello: no
    • Seyarto: no
    • Valladares: no
    • Alvarado-Gil: no
    • Grove: no
    • Dahle: no
    • Strickland: no
    • Choi: no
    • Jones: no
    • Hurtado: other
    • Reyes: other

  • Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]

    2025-06-24 · pass · 9-3

    Member-level votes (12)
    • Bryan: yes
    • Pacheco: yes
    • Papan: yes
    • Garcia: yes
    • Zbur: yes
    • Kalra: yes
    • Harabedian: yes
    • Lee: yes
    • Connolly: yes
    • Tangipa: no
    • Sanchez: no
    • Dixon: no

  • Do pass as amended.

    2025-08-29 · pass · 11-4

    Member-level votes (15)
    • Elhawary: yes
    • Pellerin: yes
    • Fong: yes
    • Pacheco: yes
    • Calderon: yes
    • Arambula: yes
    • Mark González: yes
    • Wicks: yes
    • Caloza: yes
    • Ahrens: yes
    • Solache: yes
    • Sanchez: no
    • Ta: no
    • Tangipa: no
    • Dixon: no

  • SB 580 Durazo Senate Third Reading By Bryan

    2025-09-09 · pass · 58-19

    Member-level votes (80)
    • Ahrens: yes
    • Mark González: yes
    • Quirk-Silva: yes
    • Gipson: yes
    • Rogers: yes
    • Addis: yes
    • Ward: yes
    • Haney: yes
    • Hart: yes
    • Fong: yes
    • Elhawary: yes
    • Calderon: yes
    • Wilson: yes
    • Carrillo: yes
    • Ransom: yes
    • Soria: yes
    • Michelle Rodriguez: yes
    • Berman: yes
    • Valencia: yes
    • Wicks: yes
    • Celeste Rodriguez: yes
    • Arambula: yes
    • Connolly: yes
    • Schultz: yes
    • Bauer-Kahan: yes
    • Bennett: yes
    • Papan: yes
    • Ávila Farías: yes
    • Bonta: yes
    • Aguiar-Curry: yes
    • Pacheco: yes
    • Boerner: yes
    • Alvarez: yes
    • Lee: yes
    • Stefani: yes
    • Caloza: yes
    • Sharp-Collins: yes
    • Nguyen: yes
    • Ortega: yes
    • Solache: yes
    • Lowenthal: yes
    • Blanca Rubio: yes
    • Jackson: yes
    • Bryan: yes
    • Petrie-Norris: yes
    • Harabedian: yes
    • Gabriel: yes
    • Zbur: yes
    • McKinnor: yes
    • Pellerin: yes
    • Muratsuchi: yes
    • Krell: yes
    • Irwin: yes
    • Ramos: yes
    • Patel: yes
    • Kalra: yes
    • Rivas: yes
    • Garcia: yes
    • Johnson: no
    • Dixon: no
    • Jeff Gonzalez: no
    • Castillo: no
    • Alanis: no
    • Wallis: no
    • Patterson: no
    • Ta: no
    • Hoover: no
    • Gallagher: no
    • Macedo: no
    • Ellis: no
    • Davies: no
    • DeMaio: no
    • Hadwick: no
    • Tangipa: no
    • Sanchez: no
    • Chen: no
    • Flora: no
    • Lackey: other
    • Schiavo: other
    • Bains: other

  • Unfinished Business SB580 Durazo Concurrence

    2025-09-10 · pass · 30-10

    Member-level votes (40)
    • Umberg: yes
    • Wiener: yes
    • Wahab: yes
    • Cortese: yes
    • Limón: yes
    • Durazo: yes
    • Archuleta: yes
    • Gonzalez: yes
    • Smallwood-Cuevas: yes
    • Grayson: yes
    • Weber Pierson: yes
    • Hurtado: yes
    • Arreguín: yes
    • Laird: yes
    • Cervantes: yes
    • Rubio: yes
    • McGuire: yes
    • Reyes: yes
    • Blakespear: yes
    • Padilla: yes
    • Menjivar: yes
    • Pérez: yes
    • Stern: yes
    • Allen: yes
    • Caballero: yes
    • McNerney: yes
    • Ashby: yes
    • Richardson: yes
    • Becker: yes
    • Cabaldon: yes
    • Choi: no
    • Strickland: no
    • Grove: no
    • Niello: no
    • Jones: no
    • Dahle: no
    • Ochoa Bogh: no
    • Alvarado-Gil: no
    • Seyarto: no
    • Valladares: no

Related bills

No related bills recorded for this bill.

Official source

http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB580

Attribution

Data from openstates_api_sync, retrieved 2026-10-20T10:55:56.584774Z

Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:

Source and document changesStatus and relationship changes

Session-wide evidence can include changes to other bills:

Bulk imports for this sessionSession dates and activity

Use this data

Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=CA&identifier=SB 580. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.

Known limitations

  • Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
  • Committee referrals are not yet captured.
  • Some documents have no extracted text yet, so version comparison may be limited.

See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.