Bill Commons

CA SB 566

dead

Real property tax: Personal Income Tax Law: homeowners' exemption: renter's credit.

California · 2025-2026 Regular Session · upper

Follow this bill’s action updates (Atom)

Subscribe in a feed reader. The feed covers recorded actions from the last 30 days; Bill Commons may record an action after it happened at the legislature.

Quick answers

Did CA SB 566 pass?

No. CA SB 566 did not pass — it was defeated or died in the legislative process. Latest recorded action (2026-02-02): Returned to Secretary of Senate pursuant to Joint Rule 56.

What is CA SB 566 about?

(1) Existing property tax law, pursuant to authority granted by the California Constitution, provides for a homeowners' exemption in the amount of $7,000 of the full value of a "dwelling," as defined, and authorizes the Legislature to increase this exemption. This bill, beginning with the lien date for the 2026–27 fiscal year, would increase the homeowners' exemption, for certain homeowners, from $7,000 to $50,000 of the full value of a dwelling. By imposing additional duties on local tax officials, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (2) The California Constitution requires the Legislature, whenever it increases the homeowners' property tax exemption, to provide a comparable increase in benefits to qualified renters. The Personal Income Tax Law authorizes various credits against the taxes imposed by that law, including a credit for qualified renters in the amount of $120 for spouses filing joint returns, heads of household, and surviving spouses if adjusted gross income is $50,000 or less, and in the amount of $60 for other individuals if adjusted gross income is $25,000 or less. Existing law requires the Franchise Tax Board to annually adjust for inflation these adjusted gross income amounts. This bill, for taxable years beginning on and after January 1, 2026, would increase this credit for a qualified renter to $550 for spouses filing joint returns, heads of household, and surviving spouses, as specified, if adjusted gross income is $50,000 or less, as adjusted for inflation, and to an amount equal to $275 for other individuals, as specified, if adjusted gross income is $25,000 or less, as adjusted for inflation. (3) Existing law requires any bill authorizing a new tax expenditure to contain, among other things, specific goals that the tax expenditure will achieve, detailed performance indicators, and data collection requirements. This bill would include additional information required for any bill authorizing a new tax expenditure. (4) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above. (5) Existing law requires the state to reimburse local agencies annually for certain property tax revenues lost as a result of any exemption or classification of property for purposes of ad valorem property taxation. This bill would provide that, notwithstanding those provisions, no appropriation is made and the state shall not reimburse local agencies for property tax revenues lost by them pursuant to the bill. (6) This bill would take effect immediately as a tax levy.

Who sponsors CA SB 566?

Grove is the primary sponsor of CA SB 566, joined by 1 cosponsor.

Description

(1) Existing property tax law, pursuant to authority granted by the California Constitution, provides for a homeowners' exemption in the amount of $7,000 of the full value of a "dwelling," as defined, and authorizes the Legislature to increase this exemption. This bill, beginning with the lien date for the 2026–27 fiscal year, would increase the homeowners' exemption, for certain homeowners, from $7,000 to $50,000 of the full value of a dwelling. By imposing additional duties on local tax officials, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (2) The California Constitution requires the Legislature, whenever it increases the homeowners' property tax exemption, to provide a comparable increase in benefits to qualified renters. The Personal Income Tax Law authorizes various credits against the taxes imposed by that law, including a credit for qualified renters in the amount of $120 for spouses filing joint returns, heads of household, and surviving spouses if adjusted gross income is $50,000 or less, and in the amount of $60 for other individuals if adjusted gross income is $25,000 or less. Existing law requires the Franchise Tax Board to annually adjust for inflation these adjusted gross income amounts. This bill, for taxable years beginning on and after January 1, 2026, would increase this credit for a qualified renter to $550 for spouses filing joint returns, heads of household, and surviving spouses, as specified, if adjusted gross income is $50,000 or less, as adjusted for inflation, and to an amount equal to $275 for other individuals, as specified, if adjusted gross income is $25,000 or less, as adjusted for inflation. (3) Existing law requires any bill authorizing a new tax expenditure to contain, among other things, specific goals that the tax expenditure will achieve, detailed performance indicators, and data collection requirements. This bill would include additional information required for any bill authorizing a new tax expenditure. (4) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above. (5) Existing law requires the state to reimburse local agencies annually for certain property tax revenues lost as a result of any exemption or classification of property for purposes of ad valorem property taxation. This bill would provide that, notwithstanding those provisions, no appropriation is made and the state shall not reimburse local agencies for property tax revenues lost by them pursuant to the bill. (6) This bill would take effect immediately as a tax levy.

Introduced
2025-02-20
Latest action
2026-02-02 — Returned to Secretary of Senate pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
Bill type
bill
Last updated
—

Subjects

Sponsors

  • Groveauthor
  • Alaniscoauthor

Committees

Not provided by source.

Action timeline

Newest first

  1. 2026-02-02

    Returned to Secretary of Senate pursuant to Joint Rule 56.

    failure

  2. 2025-05-14

    May 14 set for first hearing. Failed passage in committee. (Ayes 1. Noes 1. Page 1082.) Reconsideration granted.

    committee-failure,committee-passage-unfavorable

  3. 2025-05-01

    From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on REV. & TAX.

    amendment-passage,committee-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee

  4. 2025-03-18

    Set for hearing May 14.

  5. 2025-03-05

    Referred to Com. on REV. & TAX.

    referral-committee

  6. 2025-02-21

    From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 23.

  7. 2025-02-20

    Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

    introduction,reading-1,referral-committee

Versions

Documents

Votes

  • [First] hearing set for [05-14-2025]: Failed passage in Committee. Reconsideration granted

    2025-05-14 · pass · 5-0

    Member-level votes (5)
    • Grayson: yes
    • Ashby: yes
    • Valladares: yes
    • McNerney: yes
    • Umberg: yes
  • Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]

    2025-05-14 · fail · 1-1

    Member-level votes (5)
    • Valladares: yes
    • McNerney: no
    • Ashby: other
    • Grayson: other
    • Umberg: other

Related bills

No related bills recorded for this bill.

Official source

Attribution

Data from openstates_api_sync, retrieved 2026-10-29T22:12:55.927017Z

Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:

Session-wide evidence can include changes to other bills:

Use this data

Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=CA&identifier=SB 566. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.

Known limitations

  • Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
  • Committee referrals are not yet captured.
  • Some documents have no extracted text yet, so version comparison may be limited.

See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.