CA SB 410
enactedCommon interest developments: association records: exterior elevated elements inspection.
California · 2025-2026 Regular Session · upper
Subscribe in a feed reader. The feed covers recorded actions from the last 30 days; Bill Commons may record an action after it happened at the legislature.
Quick answers
Did CA SB 410 pass?
Yes. CA SB 410 has been enacted into law. Latest recorded action (2025-10-10): Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 516, Statutes of 2025.
What is CA SB 410 about?
Existing law, the Davis-Stirling Common Interest Development Act, governs the management and operation of common interest developments. Existing law requires the board of an association of a condominium project to cause a visual inspection to be conducted, at least every 9 years, of the exterior elevated elements for which the association has maintenance or repair responsibility. Existing law requires an inspector to perform the visual inspection described above, as specified, and to issue a written report containing certain information, including recommendations for any necessary repair or replacement of the load-bearing components and associated waterproofing system, as those terms are defined. Existing law limits the above-described provisions related to exterior elevated element inspections to buildings containing 3 or more multifamily dwelling units. Existing law requires the owner of a separate interest, as defined, to provide specified documents to a prospective purchaser, as provided, and an association, as defined, to provide to the owner of a separate interest, upon request, those specified documents. Existing law requires an association to distinguish and bill separately any fee charged for providing those specified documents to a separate interest owner and provides a form for billing disclosures, as provided. This bill would, in addition, require the above-described inspector's report to contain certain information, including the total number of units in the condominium project, as prescribed, and a certification that the inspector has conducted a visual inspection and evaluated a statistically significant sample, as defined, of the exterior elevated elements within the condominium project. The bill would, instead, apply the above-described provisions related to exterior elevated element inspections to buildings containing 3 or more attached multifamily dwelling units. The bill would include in the list of documents that a separate interest owner is required to provide to a prospective purchaser a copy of the report issued pursuant to the most recent inspection of any exterior elevated elements, as provided, and would modify the above-described form to reflect this requirement. Existing law requires an association to make association records available for inspection and copying by a member of the association or the member's designated representative, as specified. Existing law defines the term association records for this purpose to include, among other things, any financial document or statement required to be provided pursuant to certain provisions governing the prospective purchase of a separate interest, as described above. Existing law provides specified time periods for member inspection of certain association records, including those described above, and generally requires any association records from the current fiscal year and the prior 2 fiscal years to be available for inspection, except as provided. This bill would include in the definition of association records the above-described inspector's reports and would require those reports to be available for member inspection for 2 inspection cycles, as provided.
Who sponsors CA SB 410?
Grayson is the primary sponsor of CA SB 410.
Description
Existing law, the Davis-Stirling Common Interest Development Act, governs the management and operation of common interest developments. Existing law requires the board of an association of a condominium project to cause a visual inspection to be conducted, at least every 9 years, of the exterior elevated elements for which the association has maintenance or repair responsibility. Existing law requires an inspector to perform the visual inspection described above, as specified, and to issue a written report containing certain information, including recommendations for any necessary repair or replacement of the load-bearing components and associated waterproofing system, as those terms are defined. Existing law limits the above-described provisions related to exterior elevated element inspections to buildings containing 3 or more multifamily dwelling units. Existing law requires the owner of a separate interest, as defined, to provide specified documents to a prospective purchaser, as provided, and an association, as defined, to provide to the owner of a separate interest, upon request, those specified documents. Existing law requires an association to distinguish and bill separately any fee charged for providing those specified documents to a separate interest owner and provides a form for billing disclosures, as provided. This bill would, in addition, require the above-described inspector's report to contain certain information, including the total number of units in the condominium project, as prescribed, and a certification that the inspector has conducted a visual inspection and evaluated a statistically significant sample, as defined, of the exterior elevated elements within the condominium project. The bill would, instead, apply the above-described provisions related to exterior elevated element inspections to buildings containing 3 or more attached multifamily dwelling units. The bill would include in the list of documents that a separate interest owner is required to provide to a prospective purchaser a copy of the report issued pursuant to the most recent inspection of any exterior elevated elements, as provided, and would modify the above-described form to reflect this requirement. Existing law requires an association to make association records available for inspection and copying by a member of the association or the member's designated representative, as specified. Existing law defines the term association records for this purpose to include, among other things, any financial document or statement required to be provided pursuant to certain provisions governing the prospective purchase of a separate interest, as described above. Existing law provides specified time periods for member inspection of certain association records, including those described above, and generally requires any association records from the current fiscal year and the prior 2 fiscal years to be available for inspection, except as provided. This bill would include in the definition of association records the above-described inspector's reports and would require those reports to be available for member inspection for 2 inspection cycles, as provided.
- Introduced
- 2025-02-14
- Latest action
- 2025-10-10 — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 516, Statutes of 2025.
- Bill type
- bill
- Last updated
- —
Subjects
Sponsors
- Graysonauthor
Committees
Not provided by source.
Action timeline
Newest first
2025-10-10
Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 516, Statutes of 2025.
became-law
2025-10-10
Approved by the Governor.
executive-signature
2025-09-17
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 2 p.m.
executive-receipt
2025-09-10
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 40. Noes 0. Page 2818.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
amendment-passage,committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable
2025-09-08
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
2025-09-08
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 79. Noes 0. Page 2978.) Ordered to the Senate.
passage,reading-1,reading-3
2025-09-02
Ordered to third reading.
reading-1,reading-3
2025-09-02
Read third time and amended.
amendment-passage,reading-1,reading-3
2025-08-26
Ordered to third reading.
reading-1,reading-3
2025-08-26
Read third time and amended.
amendment-passage,reading-1,reading-3
2025-07-17
Ordered to third reading.
reading-1,reading-3
2025-07-17
From consent calendar on motion of Assembly Member Garcia.
2025-07-14
Read second time. Ordered to consent calendar.
reading-1,reading-2
2025-07-10
Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
amendment-passage,reading-1,reading-2
2025-07-09
From committee: Do pass as amended. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (July 8).
amendment-passage,committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable
2025-06-27
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
amendment-passage,committee-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee
2025-06-18
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (June 18). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable,referral-committee
2025-05-29
Referred to Coms. on H. & C.D. and JUD.
referral-committee
2025-05-15
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
reading-1
2025-05-15
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 34. Noes 0. Page 1090.) Ordered to the Assembly.
passage,reading-1,reading-3
2025-05-08
Read second time and amended. Ordered to consent calendar.
amendment-passage,reading-1,reading-2
2025-05-07
From committee: Do pass as amended. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 12. Noes 0. Page 1026.) (May 6).
amendment-passage,committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable
2025-04-23
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 11. Noes 0. Page 831.) (April 22). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable,referral-committee
2025-04-17
Set for hearing May 6 in JUD. pending receipt.
2025-04-04
Set for hearing April 22.
2025-04-02
Re-referred to Coms. on HOUSING and JUD.
referral-committee
2025-03-20
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
amendment-passage,committee-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee
2025-02-26
Referred to Com. on RLS.
referral-committee
2025-02-18
From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 17.
2025-02-14
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
introduction,reading-1,referral-committee
Versions
- 02/14/25 - Introduced — 2025-02-14Compare
- 03/20/25 - Amended Senate — 2025-03-20Compare
- 05/08/25 - Amended Senate — 2025-05-08Compare
- 06/27/25 - Amended Assembly — 2025-06-27Compare
- 07/10/25 - Amended Assembly — 2025-07-10Compare
- 08/26/25 - Amended Assembly — 2025-08-26Compare
- 09/02/25 - Amended Assembly — 2025-09-02Compare
- 09/12/25 - Enrolled — 2025-09-12Compare
- 10/10/25 - Chaptered — 2025-10-10Compare
- SB410Compare
- (document, no version)Compare
Documents
- application/pdf
- application/pdf
- application/pdf
- application/pdf
- application/pdf
- application/pdf
- application/pdf
- application/pdf
- application/pdf
- text/html
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
Votes
Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Judiciary] with the recommendation: To Consent Calendar
2025-04-22 · pass · 11-0
Member-level votes (11)
- Wahab: yes
- Cortese: yes
- Seyarto: yes
- Durazo: yes
- Caballero: yes
- Cabaldon: yes
- Arreguín: yes
- Grayson: yes
- Ochoa Bogh: yes
- Padilla: yes
- Gonzalez: yes
Do pass as amended, and be ordered to the Consent Calendar
2025-05-06 · pass · 12-0
Member-level votes (13)
- Durazo: yes
- Niello: yes
- Ashby: yes
- Caballero: yes
- Umberg: yes
- Allen: yes
- Wahab: yes
- Stern: yes
- Laird: yes
- Arreguín: yes
- Wiener: yes
- Weber Pierson: yes
- Valladares: other
Consent Calendar 2nd
2025-05-15 · pass · 34-0
Member-level votes (40)
- Becker: yes
- Laird: yes
- Archuleta: yes
- Grayson: yes
- McGuire: yes
- Menjivar: yes
- Wahab: yes
- Cabaldon: yes
- Dahle: yes
- Richardson: yes
- Valladares: yes
- Hurtado: yes
- Durazo: yes
- Seyarto: yes
- Blakespear: yes
- Pérez: yes
- Strickland: yes
- Caballero: yes
- Cortese: yes
- Allen: yes
- Limón: yes
- Wiener: yes
- Smallwood-Cuevas: yes
- Arreguín: yes
- Ashby: yes
- Weber Pierson: yes
- Umberg: yes
- Gonzalez: yes
- Choi: yes
- Jones: yes
- Niello: yes
- Ochoa Bogh: yes
- Stern: yes
- McNerney: yes
- Padilla: other
- Alvarado-Gil: other
- Grove: other
- Rubio: other
- Cervantes: other
- Reyes: other
Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Judiciary] with recommendation: To Consent Calendar
2025-06-18 · pass · 11-0
Member-level votes (12)
- Ta: yes
- Wicks: yes
- Lee: yes
- Patterson: yes
- Haney: yes
- Ávila Farías: yes
- Caloza: yes
- Quirk-Silva: yes
- Wilson: yes
- Garcia: yes
- Tangipa: yes
- Kalra: other
Do pass as amended. To Consent Calendar.
2025-07-08 · pass · 12-0
Member-level votes (12)
- Bryan: yes
- Dixon: yes
- Connolly: yes
- Stefani: yes
- Pacheco: yes
- Papan: yes
- Sanchez: yes
- Kalra: yes
- Zbur: yes
- Macedo: yes
- Harabedian: yes
- Hart: yes
SB 410 Grayson Senate Third Reading By Quirk-Silva
2025-09-08 · pass · 79-0
Member-level votes (80)
- Addis: yes
- Haney: yes
- Elhawary: yes
- Carrillo: yes
- Ransom: yes
- Berman: yes
- Bauer-Kahan: yes
- Schiavo: yes
- Alvarez: yes
- Caloza: yes
- Hoover: yes
- Ortega: yes
- Solache: yes
- Lowenthal: yes
- Petrie-Norris: yes
- Gabriel: yes
- Zbur: yes
- DeMaio: yes
- Hadwick: yes
- Irwin: yes
- Tangipa: yes
- Patel: yes
- Kalra: yes
- Sanchez: yes
- Johnson: yes
- Mark González: yes
- Gipson: yes
- Hart: yes
- Calderon: yes
- Wilson: yes
- Soria: yes
- Valencia: yes
- Celeste Rodriguez: yes
- Connolly: yes
- Papan: yes
- Bonta: yes
- Jeff Gonzalez: yes
- Alanis: yes
- Patterson: yes
- Jackson: yes
- Davies: yes
- Pellerin: yes
- Muratsuchi: yes
- Krell: yes
- Chen: yes
- Quirk-Silva: yes
- Bains: yes
- Michelle Rodriguez: yes
- Arambula: yes
- Bennett: yes
- Ávila Farías: yes
- Aguiar-Curry: yes
- Lee: yes
- Castillo: yes
- Wallis: yes
- Stefani: yes
- Ta: yes
- Blanca Rubio: yes
- Gallagher: yes
- Ellis: yes
- Macedo: yes
- McKinnor: yes
- Ramos: yes
- Rivas: yes
- Ahrens: yes
- Dixon: yes
- Rogers: yes
- Ward: yes
- Fong: yes
- Wicks: yes
- Schultz: yes
- Pacheco: yes
- Boerner: yes
- Sharp-Collins: yes
- Bryan: yes
- Harabedian: yes
- Lackey: yes
- Flora: yes
- Garcia: yes
- Nguyen: other
Unfinished Business SB410 Grayson Concurrence
2025-09-10 · pass · 40-0
Member-level votes (40)
- Umberg: yes
- Grove: yes
- Wiener: yes
- Niello: yes
- Jones: yes
- Wahab: yes
- Cortese: yes
- Dahle: yes
- Alvarado-Gil: yes
- Limón: yes
- Seyarto: yes
- Durazo: yes
- Choi: yes
- Archuleta: yes
- Gonzalez: yes
- Smallwood-Cuevas: yes
- Grayson: yes
- Weber Pierson: yes
- Hurtado: yes
- Arreguín: yes
- Laird: yes
- Cervantes: yes
- Rubio: yes
- McGuire: yes
- Reyes: yes
- Blakespear: yes
- Padilla: yes
- Valladares: yes
- Menjivar: yes
- Pérez: yes
- Strickland: yes
- Stern: yes
- Allen: yes
- Caballero: yes
- McNerney: yes
- Ochoa Bogh: yes
- Ashby: yes
- Richardson: yes
- Becker: yes
- Cabaldon: yes
Related bills
No related bills recorded for this bill.
Official source
Attribution
Data from openstates_api_sync, retrieved 2026-10-30T17:11:01.342707Z
Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:
Session-wide evidence can include changes to other bills:
Use this data
Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=CA&identifier=SB 410. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.
Known limitations
- Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
- Committee referrals are not yet captured.
- Some documents have no extracted text yet, so version comparison may be limited.
See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.