CA SB 392
enactedRegional park districts: East Bay Regional Park District: East Bay Hills Conservation Program.
California · 2025-2026 Regular Session · upper
Quick answers
Did CA SB 392 pass?
Yes. CA SB 392 has been enacted into law as of 2025-10-13. Latest recorded action (2025-10-13): Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 754, Statutes of 2025.
What is CA SB 392 about?
Existing law establishes procedures for the formation of regional park districts and prescribes the powers, functions, and duties of those districts. The East Bay Regional Park District is one such regional park district. This bill would authorize the East Bay Regional Park District to establish and administer the East Bay Hills Conservation Program to address resource and recreational goals of the East Bay Hills, as defined. The bill would authorize the Park District to collaborate with California Native American tribes and state, regional, and local partners to help achieve specified goals of the program. The bill would require the East Bay Hills to be acknowledged as an area of statewide significance in local land use policy documents developed or updated on or after January 1, 2026, affecting land use within the East Bay Hills. To the extent that this bill would impose new duties on local entities, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the East Bay Regional Park District. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Who sponsors CA SB 392?
Grayson is the primary sponsor of CA SB 392, joined by 4 cosponsors.
Description
Existing law establishes procedures for the formation of regional park districts and prescribes the powers, functions, and duties of those districts. The East Bay Regional Park District is one such regional park district. This bill would authorize the East Bay Regional Park District to establish and administer the East Bay Hills Conservation Program to address resource and recreational goals of the East Bay Hills, as defined. The bill would authorize the Park District to collaborate with California Native American tribes and state, regional, and local partners to help achieve specified goals of the program. The bill would require the East Bay Hills to be acknowledged as an area of statewide significance in local land use policy documents developed or updated on or after January 1, 2026, affecting land use within the East Bay Hills. To the extent that this bill would impose new duties on local entities, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the East Bay Regional Park District. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
- Introduced
- 2025-02-14
- Latest action
- 2025-10-13 — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 754, Statutes of 2025.
- Bill type
- bill
- Last updated
- —
Subjects
Sponsors
- Graysonauthor
- Arreguíncoauthor
- McNerneycoauthor
- Wahabcoauthor
- Bontacoauthor
Committees
Not provided by source.
Action timeline
2025-02-14
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
introduction,reading-1,referral-committee
2025-02-18
From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 17.
2025-02-26
Referred to Com. on L. GOV.
referral-committee
2025-03-24
Set for hearing April 23.
2025-04-10
April 23 set for first hearing canceled at the request of author.
2025-04-11
Set for hearing April 30.
2025-04-23
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
amendment-passage,committee-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee
2025-04-30
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 968.) (April 30). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable,referral-committee
2025-05-02
Set for hearing May 12.
2025-05-12
From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and ordered to consent calendar.
committee-passage,reading-1,reading-2
2025-05-13
Read second time. Ordered to consent calendar.
reading-1,reading-2
2025-05-15
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 34. Noes 0. Page 1091.) Ordered to the Assembly.
passage,reading-1,reading-3
2025-05-15
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
reading-1
2025-05-29
Referred to Com. on L. GOV.
referral-committee
2025-06-13
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
amendment-passage,committee-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee
2025-07-03
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (July 2). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable,referral-committee
2025-07-03
Coauthors revised.
2025-07-16
From committee: Do pass. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 13. Noes 0.) (July 16).
committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable
2025-07-17
Read second time. Ordered to consent calendar.
reading-1,reading-2
2025-08-21
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 77. Noes 0. Page 2706.) Ordered to the Senate.
passage,reading-1,reading-3
2025-08-21
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
2025-08-27
Ordered to special consent calendar.
2025-08-29
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 37. Noes 0. Page 2287.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
amendment-passage,committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable
2025-09-05
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 2 p.m.
executive-receipt
2025-10-13
Approved by the Governor.
executive-signature
2025-10-13
Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 754, Statutes of 2025.
became-law
Versions
Documents
- application/pdf
- application/pdf
- application/pdf
- application/pdf
- application/pdf
- text/html
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
Votes
Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations] with the recommendation: To Consent Calendar
2025-04-30 · pass · 7-0
Member-level votes (7)
- Arreguín: yes
- Laird: yes
- Durazo: yes
- Cabaldon: yes
- Seyarto: yes
- Choi: yes
- Wiener: yes
Consent Calendar 2nd SB392 Grayson et al.
2025-05-15 · pass · 34-0
Member-level votes (40)
- Becker: yes
- Laird: yes
- Archuleta: yes
- Grayson: yes
- McGuire: yes
- Menjivar: yes
- Wahab: yes
- Cabaldon: yes
- Dahle: yes
- Richardson: yes
- Valladares: yes
- Hurtado: yes
- Durazo: yes
- Seyarto: yes
- Blakespear: yes
- Pérez: yes
- Strickland: yes
- Caballero: yes
- Cortese: yes
- Allen: yes
- Limón: yes
- Wiener: yes
- Smallwood-Cuevas: yes
- Arreguín: yes
- Ashby: yes
- Weber Pierson: yes
- Umberg: yes
- Gonzalez: yes
- Choi: yes
- Jones: yes
- Niello: yes
- Ochoa Bogh: yes
- Stern: yes
- McNerney: yes
- Padilla: other
- Alvarado-Gil: other
- Grove: other
- Rubio: other
- Cervantes: other
- Reyes: other
Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations] with recommendation: To Consent Calendar
2025-07-02 · pass · 10-0
Member-level votes (10)
- Stefani: yes
- Pacheco: yes
- Ta: yes
- Ransom: yes
- Blanca Rubio: yes
- Hoover: yes
- Ward: yes
- Carrillo: yes
- Ramos: yes
- Wilson: yes
Do pass. To Consent Calendar.
2025-07-16 · pass · 13-0
Member-level votes (15)
- Wicks: yes
- Tangipa: yes
- Sanchez: yes
- Dixon: yes
- Caloza: yes
- Solache: yes
- Ta: yes
- Calderon: yes
- Pacheco: yes
- Hart: yes
- Fong: yes
- Elhawary: yes
- Mark González: yes
- Pellerin: other
- Arambula: other
SB 392 Grayson Consent Calendar Second Day
2025-08-21 · pass · 77-0
Member-level votes (79)
- Berman: yes
- Connolly: yes
- Sanchez: yes
- Nguyen: yes
- Zbur: yes
- Gallagher: yes
- Pacheco: yes
- Sharp-Collins: yes
- Petrie-Norris: yes
- DeMaio: yes
- Wicks: yes
- Davies: yes
- McKinnor: yes
- Ramos: yes
- Ahrens: yes
- Schultz: yes
- Muratsuchi: yes
- Papan: yes
- Kalra: yes
- Patel: yes
- Ávila Farías: yes
- Bonta: yes
- Aguiar-Curry: yes
- Bennett: yes
- Irwin: yes
- Bryan: yes
- Hoover: yes
- Boerner: yes
- Ortega: yes
- Bauer-Kahan: yes
- Calderon: yes
- Wallis: yes
- Dixon: yes
- Soria: yes
- Blanca Rubio: yes
- Flora: yes
- Wilson: yes
- Michelle Rodriguez: yes
- Schiavo: yes
- Fong: yes
- Ta: yes
- Jackson: yes
- Solache: yes
- Krell: yes
- Mark González: yes
- Rogers: yes
- Hart: yes
- Lee: yes
- Harabedian: yes
- Lackey: yes
- Rivas: yes
- Castillo: yes
- Arambula: yes
- Lowenthal: yes
- Carrillo: yes
- Celeste Rodriguez: yes
- Bains: yes
- Stefani: yes
- Patterson: yes
- Alvarez: yes
- Haney: yes
- Gabriel: yes
- Valencia: yes
- Macedo: yes
- Tangipa: yes
- Jeff Gonzalez: yes
- Caloza: yes
- Elhawary: yes
- Gipson: yes
- Pellerin: yes
- Ward: yes
- Quirk-Silva: yes
- Garcia: yes
- Alanis: yes
- Hadwick: yes
- Chen: yes
- Ellis: yes
- Ransom: other
- Addis: other
Special Consent SB392 Grayson et al.
2025-08-29 · pass · 37-0
Member-level votes (40)
- Choi: yes
- Archuleta: yes
- Becker: yes
- Valladares: yes
- Cervantes: yes
- Arreguín: yes
- Hurtado: yes
- Alvarado-Gil: yes
- Caballero: yes
- McGuire: yes
- Ochoa Bogh: yes
- Rubio: yes
- Niello: yes
- Menjivar: yes
- Cortese: yes
- Weber Pierson: yes
- Durazo: yes
- Limón: yes
- Wiener: yes
- Richardson: yes
- Stern: yes
- Smallwood-Cuevas: yes
- Strickland: yes
- Wahab: yes
- Blakespear: yes
- Laird: yes
- Ashby: yes
- Gonzalez: yes
- Grayson: yes
- Umberg: yes
- McNerney: yes
- Dahle: yes
- Seyarto: yes
- Pérez: yes
- Grove: yes
- Cabaldon: yes
- Padilla: yes
- Allen: other
- Jones: other
- Reyes: other
Related bills
No related bills recorded for this bill.
Official source
Attribution
Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T01:34:27.960412Z
Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:
Use this data
Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=CA&identifier=SB 392. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.
Known limitations
- Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
- Committee referrals are not yet captured.
- Some documents have no extracted text yet, so version comparison may be limited.
See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.