Bill Commons

CA SB 390

enacted

Community facilities district: inclusion or annexation of territory: County of San Mateo.

California · 2025-2026 Regular Session · upper

Follow this bill’s action updates (Atom)

Subscribe in a feed reader. The feed covers recorded actions from the last 30 days; Bill Commons may record an action after it happened at the legislature.

Quick answers

Did CA SB 390 pass?

Yes. CA SB 390 has been enacted into law. Latest recorded action (2025-10-11): Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 652, Statutes of 2025.

What is CA SB 390 about?

Existing law, the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, authorizes the legislative body of a local agency, as defined, to create a community facilities district to finance specified types of services within an area. Existing law prohibits a territory that is dedicated or restricted to agricultural, open-space, or conservation uses from being included within or annexed to a specified community facilities district without the landowner's consent. This bill would, notwithstanding those prohibitions, specify that for territory that is located within the regional shoreline of the County of San Mateo, the consent of a landowner is not required, if specified conditions are met. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the County of San Mateo.

Who sponsors CA SB 390?

Becker is the primary sponsor of CA SB 390, joined by 3 cosponsors.

Description

Existing law, the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, authorizes the legislative body of a local agency, as defined, to create a community facilities district to finance specified types of services within an area. Existing law prohibits a territory that is dedicated or restricted to agricultural, open-space, or conservation uses from being included within or annexed to a specified community facilities district without the landowner's consent. This bill would, notwithstanding those prohibitions, specify that for territory that is located within the regional shoreline of the County of San Mateo, the consent of a landowner is not required, if specified conditions are met. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the County of San Mateo.

Introduced
2025-02-14
Latest action
2025-10-11 — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 652, Statutes of 2025.
Bill type
bill
Last updated
—

Subjects

Sponsors

  • Beckerauthor
  • Wienercoauthor
  • Bermancoauthor
  • Stefanicoauthor

Committees

Not provided by source.

Action timeline

Newest first

  1. 2025-10-11

    Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 652, Statutes of 2025.

    became-law

  2. 2025-10-11

    Approved by the Governor.

    executive-signature

  3. 2025-09-09

    Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 2 p.m.

    executive-receipt

  4. 2025-09-03

    Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 40. Noes 0. Page 2443.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.

    amendment-passage,committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable

  5. 2025-08-28

    In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.

  6. 2025-08-28

    Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 74. Noes 1. Page 2765.) Ordered to the Senate.

    passage,reading-1,reading-3

  7. 2025-08-20

    Read third time and amended.

    amendment-passage,reading-1,reading-3

  8. 2025-08-20

    Ordered to third reading.

    reading-1,reading-3

  9. 2025-06-19

    Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

    reading-1,reading-2,reading-3

  10. 2025-06-18

    From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (June 18).

    committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable

  11. 2025-06-05

    Referred to Com. on L. GOV.

    referral-committee

  12. 2025-05-28

    In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

    reading-1

  13. 2025-05-27

    Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 39. Noes 0. Page 1242.) Ordered to the Assembly.

    passage,reading-1,reading-3

  14. 2025-05-08

    Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

    reading-1,reading-2,reading-3

  15. 2025-05-07

    From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 1038.) (May 7).

    committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable

  16. 2025-04-30

    From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.

    amendment-passage,committee-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee

  17. 2025-03-24

    Set for hearing May 7.

  18. 2025-02-26

    Referred to Com. on L. GOV.

    referral-committee

  19. 2025-02-18

    From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 17.

  20. 2025-02-14

    Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

    introduction,reading-1,referral-committee

Versions

  • 02/14/25 - Introduced — 2025-02-14Compare
  • 04/30/25 - Amended Senate — 2025-04-30Compare
  • 08/20/25 - Amended Assembly — 2025-08-20Compare
  • 09/05/25 - Enrolled — 2025-09-05Compare
  • 10/11/25 - Chaptered — 2025-10-11Compare
  • SB390Compare
  • (document, no version)Compare

Documents

Votes

  • Do pass

    2025-05-07 · pass · 7-0

    Member-level votes (7)
    • Durazo: yes
    • Seyarto: yes
    • Laird: yes
    • Arreguín: yes
    • Choi: yes
    • Wiener: yes
    • Cabaldon: yes

  • 3rd Reading

    2025-05-27 · pass · 39-0

    Member-level votes (40)
    • Cabaldon: yes
    • Wahab: yes
    • Pérez: yes
    • Padilla: yes
    • Allen: yes
    • Seyarto: yes
    • Weber Pierson: yes
    • Grove: yes
    • Archuleta: yes
    • Laird: yes
    • Umberg: yes
    • Stern: yes
    • Limón: yes
    • Grayson: yes
    • McGuire: yes
    • Jones: yes
    • McNerney: yes
    • Ochoa Bogh: yes
    • Caballero: yes
    • Ashby: yes
    • Rubio: yes
    • Cortese: yes
    • Arreguín: yes
    • Richardson: yes
    • Hurtado: yes
    • Smallwood-Cuevas: yes
    • Cervantes: yes
    • Wiener: yes
    • Alvarado-Gil: yes
    • Gonzalez: yes
    • Valladares: yes
    • Menjivar: yes
    • Durazo: yes
    • Becker: yes
    • Strickland: yes
    • Blakespear: yes
    • Dahle: yes
    • Choi: yes
    • Niello: yes
    • Reyes: other

  • Do pass.

    2025-06-18 · pass · 9-0

    Member-level votes (10)
    • Hoover: yes
    • Pacheco: yes
    • Ransom: yes
    • Haney: yes
    • Carrillo: yes
    • Blanca Rubio: yes
    • Stefani: yes
    • Wilson: yes
    • Ramos: yes
    • Ta: other

  • SB 390 Becker Senate Third Reading By Stefani

    2025-08-28 · pass · 74-1

    Member-level votes (79)
    • Michelle Rodriguez: yes
    • Zbur: yes
    • Jeff Gonzalez: yes
    • Carrillo: yes
    • Stefani: yes
    • Dixon: yes
    • Krell: yes
    • Muratsuchi: yes
    • Ransom: yes
    • Schiavo: yes
    • Ahrens: yes
    • Tangipa: yes
    • Chen: yes
    • Blanca Rubio: yes
    • Bryan: yes
    • Papan: yes
    • Lee: yes
    • Soria: yes
    • Ellis: yes
    • Bonta: yes
    • Addis: yes
    • Aguiar-Curry: yes
    • Garcia: yes
    • Hadwick: yes
    • Hart: yes
    • Ortega: yes
    • Bauer-Kahan: yes
    • Nguyen: yes
    • Mark González: yes
    • Solache: yes
    • Gabriel: yes
    • Bennett: yes
    • Castillo: yes
    • Irwin: yes
    • Pellerin: yes
    • Harabedian: yes
    • Ward: yes
    • Schultz: yes
    • Calderon: yes
    • Alanis: yes
    • Pacheco: yes
    • Macedo: yes
    • Wicks: yes
    • Connolly: yes
    • Bains: yes
    • Flora: yes
    • Sanchez: yes
    • Jackson: yes
    • Lackey: yes
    • Patel: yes
    • Gallagher: yes
    • Davies: yes
    • Kalra: yes
    • Celeste Rodriguez: yes
    • McKinnor: yes
    • Petrie-Norris: yes
    • Ávila Farías: yes
    • Caloza: yes
    • Sharp-Collins: yes
    • Elhawary: yes
    • Wilson: yes
    • Hoover: yes
    • Fong: yes
    • Gipson: yes
    • Patterson: yes
    • Quirk-Silva: yes
    • Rivas: yes
    • Rogers: yes
    • Boerner: yes
    • Arambula: yes
    • Ramos: yes
    • Lowenthal: yes
    • Haney: yes
    • Wallis: yes
    • DeMaio: no
    • Ta: other
    • Alvarez: other
    • Berman: other
    • Valencia: other

  • Unfinished Business SB390 Becker et al. Concurrence

    2025-09-03 · pass · 40-0

    Member-level votes (40)
    • Becker: yes
    • Arreguín: yes
    • Durazo: yes
    • Gonzalez: yes
    • Stern: yes
    • Cabaldon: yes
    • Blakespear: yes
    • Rubio: yes
    • Hurtado: yes
    • Ashby: yes
    • Limón: yes
    • Wiener: yes
    • Allen: yes
    • Valladares: yes
    • Padilla: yes
    • McNerney: yes
    • Pérez: yes
    • Cortese: yes
    • Smallwood-Cuevas: yes
    • Dahle: yes
    • Choi: yes
    • Menjivar: yes
    • Strickland: yes
    • Grayson: yes
    • McGuire: yes
    • Niello: yes
    • Cervantes: yes
    • Weber Pierson: yes
    • Richardson: yes
    • Archuleta: yes
    • Laird: yes
    • Ochoa Bogh: yes
    • Seyarto: yes
    • Jones: yes
    • Alvarado-Gil: yes
    • Grove: yes
    • Wahab: yes
    • Umberg: yes
    • Reyes: yes
    • Caballero: yes

Related bills

No related bills recorded for this bill.

Official source

http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB390

Attribution

Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T01:34:27.960412Z

Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:

Source and document changesStatus and relationship changes

Session-wide evidence can include changes to other bills:

Bulk imports for this sessionSession dates and activity

Use this data

Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=CA&identifier=SB 390. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.

Known limitations

  • Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
  • Committee referrals are not yet captured.
  • Some documents have no extracted text yet, so version comparison may be limited.

See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.