Bill Commons

CA SB 384

in committee

Preventing Algorithmic Price Fixing Act: prohibition on certain price-setting algorithm uses.

California · 2025-2026 Regular Session · upper

Quick answers

Did CA SB 384 pass?

Not yet. CA SB 384 is in committee as of 2025-08-29 and has not come to a final vote. Latest recorded action (2025-08-29): August 29 hearing: Held in committee and under submission.

What is CA SB 384 about?

Existing law governs various business practices in this state, including certain laws relating to the use of technology. Existing law, commonly known as the Cartwright Act, identifies certain acts that are unlawful restraints of trade and unlawful trusts and prescribes provisions for its enforcement through civil actions. This bill, the Preventing Algorithmic Price Fixing Act, would prohibit a person from selling, licensing, providing, or using a price-setting algorithm, as defined, with the intent or reasonable expectation that it be used by 2 or more competitors, as defined, in the same market if the person knows or should know that the algorithm processes nonpublic data, as defined, to set either: (1) a price or supply level of a good or service or (2) a rent or occupancy level of rental property. The bill would provide a user of a price-setting algorithm an affirmative defense to liability if the user exercised reasonable due diligence, as specified. The bill would authorize the Attorney General or a district attorney, city attorney, or county counsel to file a civil action for violations of these provisions, as specified, including for a civil penalty of up to $1,000 per violation, as specified. This bill would declare that a contract that violates these provisions is to that extent void and that its provisions do not limit the applicability of antitrust laws.

Who sponsors CA SB 384?

Wahab is the primary sponsor of CA SB 384.

Description

Existing law governs various business practices in this state, including certain laws relating to the use of technology. Existing law, commonly known as the Cartwright Act, identifies certain acts that are unlawful restraints of trade and unlawful trusts and prescribes provisions for its enforcement through civil actions. This bill, the Preventing Algorithmic Price Fixing Act, would prohibit a person from selling, licensing, providing, or using a price-setting algorithm, as defined, with the intent or reasonable expectation that it be used by 2 or more competitors, as defined, in the same market if the person knows or should know that the algorithm processes nonpublic data, as defined, to set either: (1) a price or supply level of a good or service or (2) a rent or occupancy level of rental property. The bill would provide a user of a price-setting algorithm an affirmative defense to liability if the user exercised reasonable due diligence, as specified. The bill would authorize the Attorney General or a district attorney, city attorney, or county counsel to file a civil action for violations of these provisions, as specified, including for a civil penalty of up to $1,000 per violation, as specified. This bill would declare that a contract that violates these provisions is to that extent void and that its provisions do not limit the applicability of antitrust laws.

Introduced
2025-02-14
Latest action
2025-08-29 — August 29 hearing: Held in committee and under submission.
Bill type
bill
Last updated

Subjects

Sponsors

  • Wahabauthor

Committees

Not provided by source.

Action timeline

  1. 2025-02-14

    Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

    introduction,reading-1,referral-committee

  2. 2025-02-18

    From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 17.

  3. 2025-02-26

    Referred to Com. on JUD.

    referral-committee

  4. 2025-04-03

    Set for hearing April 22.

  5. 2025-04-08

    From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.

    amendment-passage,committee-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee

  6. 2025-04-23

    From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 11. Noes 2. Page 834.) (April 22).

    amendment-passage,committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable,referral-committee

  7. 2025-04-24

    Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

    amendment-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee

  8. 2025-04-29

    Set for hearing May 5.

  9. 2025-05-05

    May 5 hearing: Placed on APPR. suspense file.

  10. 2025-05-16

    Set for hearing May 23.

  11. 2025-05-23

    Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

    reading-1,reading-2,reading-3

  12. 2025-05-23

    From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 1. Page 1198.) (May 23).

    committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable

  13. 2025-06-03

    Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 28. Noes 10. Page 1469.) Ordered to the Assembly.

    passage,reading-1,reading-3

  14. 2025-06-04

    In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

    reading-1

  15. 2025-06-09

    Referred to Coms. on JUD. and P. & C.P.

    referral-committee

  16. 2025-06-26

    From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.

    amendment-passage,committee-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee

  17. 2025-07-02

    From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on P. & C.P. (Ayes 9. Noes 2.) (July 1). Re-referred to Com. on P. & C.P.

    committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable,referral-committee

  18. 2025-07-17

    Assembly Rule 63 suspended. (Ayes 49. Noes 15. Page 2578.)

  19. 2025-07-17

    From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 4.) (July 16).

    amendment-passage,committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable,referral-committee

  20. 2025-07-17

    Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

    amendment-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee

  21. 2025-08-20

    August 20 set for first hearing. Placed on APPR. suspense file.

  22. 2025-08-29

    August 29 hearing: Held in committee and under submission.

Versions

  • 02/14/25 - Introduced — 2025-02-14Compare
  • 04/08/25 - Amended Senate — 2025-04-08Compare
  • 04/24/25 - Amended Senate — 2025-04-24Compare
  • 06/26/25 - Amended Assembly — 2025-06-26Compare
  • 07/17/25 - Amended Assembly — 2025-07-17Compare
  • SB384Compare
  • (document, no version)Compare

Documents

Votes

  • Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to the Committee on [Appropriations]

    2025-04-22 · pass · 11-2

    Member-level votes (13)
    • Allen: yes
    • Wahab: yes
    • Umberg: yes
    • Durazo: yes
    • Caballero: yes
    • Laird: yes
    • Arreguín: yes
    • Stern: yes
    • Weber Pierson: yes
    • Ashby: yes
    • Wiener: yes
    • Valladares: no
    • Niello: no
  • Placed on suspense file

    2025-05-05 · pass · 7-0

    Member-level votes (7)
    • Richardson: yes
    • Grayson: yes
    • Seyarto: yes
    • Caballero: yes
    • Dahle: yes
    • Cabaldon: yes
    • Wahab: yes
  • Do pass

    2025-05-23 · pass · 5-1

    Member-level votes (7)
    • Caballero: yes
    • Wahab: yes
    • Cabaldon: yes
    • Richardson: yes
    • Grayson: yes
    • Seyarto: no
    • Dahle: other
  • 3rd Reading

    2025-06-03 · pass · 28-10

    Member-level votes (40)
    • Gonzalez: yes
    • McNerney: yes
    • Weber Pierson: yes
    • Becker: yes
    • Laird: yes
    • Ashby: yes
    • Richardson: yes
    • Cervantes: yes
    • Padilla: yes
    • Stern: yes
    • Durazo: yes
    • Arreguín: yes
    • Cortese: yes
    • Hurtado: yes
    • Pérez: yes
    • Grayson: yes
    • Allen: yes
    • Menjivar: yes
    • Smallwood-Cuevas: yes
    • Wiener: yes
    • Archuleta: yes
    • McGuire: yes
    • Blakespear: yes
    • Wahab: yes
    • Limón: yes
    • Caballero: yes
    • Rubio: yes
    • Umberg: yes
    • Valladares: no
    • Choi: no
    • Seyarto: no
    • Niello: no
    • Strickland: no
    • Ochoa Bogh: no
    • Alvarado-Gil: no
    • Grove: no
    • Dahle: no
    • Jones: no
    • Reyes: other
    • Cabaldon: other
  • Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Privacy and Consumer Protection]

    2025-07-01 · pass · 9-2

    Member-level votes (12)
    • Connolly: yes
    • Zbur: yes
    • Harabedian: yes
    • Kalra: yes
    • Pacheco: yes
    • Papan: yes
    • Stefani: yes
    • Bryan: yes
    • Bauer-Kahan: yes
    • Dixon: no
    • Sanchez: no
    • Macedo: other
  • Do pass as amended and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]

    2025-07-16 · pass · 9-4

    Member-level votes (15)
    • Bryan: yes
    • Wicks: yes
    • Wilson: yes
    • Pellerin: yes
    • Lowenthal: yes
    • Ward: yes
    • Bauer-Kahan: yes
    • Ortega: yes
    • McKinnor: yes
    • Macedo: no
    • Patterson: no
    • DeMaio: no
    • Dixon: no
    • Irwin: other
    • Petrie-Norris: other

Related bills

No related bills recorded for this bill.

Official source

Attribution

Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T01:34:27.960412Z

Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:

Use this data

Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=CA&identifier=SB 384. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.

Known limitations

  • Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
  • Committee referrals are not yet captured.
  • Some documents have no extracted text yet, so version comparison may be limited.

See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.