Bill Commons

CA SB 346

enacted

Local agencies: transient occupancy taxes: short-term rental facilitator.

California · 2025-2026 Regular Session · upper

Quick answers

Did CA SB 346 pass?

Yes. CA SB 346 has been enacted into law as of 2025-10-13. Latest recorded action (2025-10-13): Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 751, Statutes of 2025.

What is CA SB 346 about?

Existing law authorizes a local authority, by ordinance or resolution, to regulate the occupancy of a room or rooms, or other living space, in a hotel, inn, tourist home or house, motel, or other lodging for a period of less than 30 days. This bill would authorize a local agency, defined to mean a city, county, or city and county, to enact an ordinance to require a short-term rental facilitator, as defined, to report, in the form and manner prescribed by the local agency, the physical address, including 9-digit ZIP Code, of each short-term rental, as defined, during the reporting period. The bill would also authorize a local agency to request additional information, as provided, when the physical address is not sufficient for the local agency to identify a specific short-term rental. The bill would authorize the local agency to impose an administrative fine or penalty for failure to file the report, and would authorize the local agency to initiate an audit of a short-term rental facilitator, as described. The bill would require a short-term rental facilitator, in a jurisdiction that has adopted an ordinance, to include in the listing of a short-term rental any applicable local license number associated with the short-term rental and any transient occupancy tax certification issued by a local agency. The bill would state these provisions do not preempt a local agency from adopting an ordinance that regulates short-term rentals, short-term rental facilitators, or the payment and collection of transient occupancy taxes in a manner that differs from those described in the bill.

Who sponsors CA SB 346?

Durazo is the primary sponsor of CA SB 346, joined by 3 cosponsors.

Description

Existing law authorizes a local authority, by ordinance or resolution, to regulate the occupancy of a room or rooms, or other living space, in a hotel, inn, tourist home or house, motel, or other lodging for a period of less than 30 days. This bill would authorize a local agency, defined to mean a city, county, or city and county, to enact an ordinance to require a short-term rental facilitator, as defined, to report, in the form and manner prescribed by the local agency, the physical address, including 9-digit ZIP Code, of each short-term rental, as defined, during the reporting period. The bill would also authorize a local agency to request additional information, as provided, when the physical address is not sufficient for the local agency to identify a specific short-term rental. The bill would authorize the local agency to impose an administrative fine or penalty for failure to file the report, and would authorize the local agency to initiate an audit of a short-term rental facilitator, as described. The bill would require a short-term rental facilitator, in a jurisdiction that has adopted an ordinance, to include in the listing of a short-term rental any applicable local license number associated with the short-term rental and any transient occupancy tax certification issued by a local agency. The bill would state these provisions do not preempt a local agency from adopting an ordinance that regulates short-term rentals, short-term rental facilitators, or the payment and collection of transient occupancy taxes in a manner that differs from those described in the bill.

Introduced
2025-02-12
Latest action
2025-10-13 — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 751, Statutes of 2025.
Bill type
bill
Last updated

Subjects

Sponsors

  • Durazoauthor
  • Allencoauthor
  • Limóncoauthor
  • Wahabcoauthor

Committees

Not provided by source.

Action timeline

  1. 2025-02-12

    Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

    introduction,reading-1,referral-committee

  2. 2025-02-13

    From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 15.

  3. 2025-02-19

    Referred to Coms. on L. GOV. and JUD.

    referral-committee

  4. 2025-03-04

    Set for hearing March 19.

  5. 2025-03-19

    From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 422.) (March 19).

    amendment-passage,committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable,referral-committee

  6. 2025-03-20

    Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.

    amendment-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee

  7. 2025-04-22

    Set for hearing May 6.

  8. 2025-05-07

    From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 0. Page 1026.) (May 6).

    amendment-passage,committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable

  9. 2025-05-08

    Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.

    amendment-passage,reading-1,reading-2,reading-3

  10. 2025-05-27

    Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 38. Noes 0. Page 1243.) Ordered to the Assembly.

    passage,reading-1,reading-3

  11. 2025-05-28

    In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

    reading-1

  12. 2025-06-05

    Referred to Coms. on L. GOV. and JUD.

    referral-committee

  13. 2025-06-24

    From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.

    amendment-passage,committee-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee

  14. 2025-07-03

    From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (July 2).

    amendment-passage,committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable,referral-committee

  15. 2025-07-07

    Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.

    amendment-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee

  16. 2025-07-16

    From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (July 15).

    committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable

  17. 2025-07-17

    Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

    reading-1,reading-2,reading-3

  18. 2025-08-29

    Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 64. Noes 0. Page 2793.) Ordered to the Senate.

    passage,reading-1,reading-3

  19. 2025-08-29

    In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.

  20. 2025-09-02

    Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 40. Noes 0. Page 2409.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.

    amendment-passage,committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable

  21. 2025-09-09

    Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 2 p.m.

    executive-receipt

  22. 2025-10-13

    Approved by the Governor.

    executive-signature

  23. 2025-10-13

    Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 751, Statutes of 2025.

    became-law

Versions

  • 02/12/25 - Introduced — 2025-02-12Compare
  • 03/20/25 - Amended Senate — 2025-03-20Compare
  • 05/08/25 - Amended Senate — 2025-05-08Compare
  • 06/24/25 - Amended Assembly — 2025-06-24Compare
  • 07/07/25 - Amended Assembly — 2025-07-07Compare
  • 09/04/25 - Enrolled — 2025-09-04Compare
  • 10/13/25 - Chaptered — 2025-10-13Compare
  • SB346Compare
  • (document, no version)Compare

Documents

Votes

  • Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to the Committee on [Judiciary]

    2025-03-19 · pass · 7-0

    Member-level votes (7)
    • Cabaldon: yes
    • Wiener: yes
    • Choi: yes
    • Durazo: yes
    • Laird: yes
    • Arreguín: yes
    • Seyarto: yes
  • Do pass as amended

    2025-05-06 · pass · 12-0

    Member-level votes (13)
    • Durazo: yes
    • Niello: yes
    • Ashby: yes
    • Caballero: yes
    • Valladares: yes
    • Umberg: yes
    • Allen: yes
    • Wahab: yes
    • Stern: yes
    • Laird: yes
    • Arreguín: yes
    • Weber Pierson: yes
    • Wiener: other
  • 3rd Reading SB346 Durazo et al.

    2025-05-27 · pass · 38-0

    Member-level votes (40)
    • Cabaldon: yes
    • Wahab: yes
    • Pérez: yes
    • Padilla: yes
    • Allen: yes
    • Seyarto: yes
    • Weber Pierson: yes
    • Grove: yes
    • Archuleta: yes
    • Laird: yes
    • Umberg: yes
    • Stern: yes
    • Limón: yes
    • Grayson: yes
    • McGuire: yes
    • Jones: yes
    • McNerney: yes
    • Ochoa Bogh: yes
    • Caballero: yes
    • Ashby: yes
    • Rubio: yes
    • Cortese: yes
    • Arreguín: yes
    • Richardson: yes
    • Hurtado: yes
    • Smallwood-Cuevas: yes
    • Cervantes: yes
    • Alvarado-Gil: yes
    • Gonzalez: yes
    • Valladares: yes
    • Menjivar: yes
    • Durazo: yes
    • Becker: yes
    • Strickland: yes
    • Blakespear: yes
    • Dahle: yes
    • Choi: yes
    • Niello: yes
    • Wiener: other
    • Reyes: other
  • Do pass as amended and be re-referred to the Committee on [Judiciary]

    2025-07-02 · pass · 9-0

    Member-level votes (10)
    • Stefani: yes
    • Pacheco: yes
    • Ta: yes
    • Ransom: yes
    • Blanca Rubio: yes
    • Ward: yes
    • Carrillo: yes
    • Ramos: yes
    • Wilson: yes
    • Hoover: other
  • Do pass.

    2025-07-15 · pass · 11-0

    Member-level votes (12)
    • Stefani: yes
    • Dixon: yes
    • Bryan: yes
    • Macedo: yes
    • Kalra: yes
    • Pacheco: yes
    • Bauer-Kahan: yes
    • Connolly: yes
    • Papan: yes
    • Harabedian: yes
    • Zbur: yes
    • Sanchez: other
  • SB 346 Durazo Senate Third Reading By Bauer-Kahan

    2025-08-29 · pass · 64-0

    Member-level votes (79)
    • Connolly: yes
    • Ta: yes
    • Hart: yes
    • Wallis: yes
    • Soria: yes
    • Bennett: yes
    • Krell: yes
    • Hadwick: yes
    • Pacheco: yes
    • Quirk-Silva: yes
    • Calderon: yes
    • Boerner: yes
    • Dixon: yes
    • Wicks: yes
    • Tangipa: yes
    • Pellerin: yes
    • Blanca Rubio: yes
    • Bonta: yes
    • Aguiar-Curry: yes
    • Carrillo: yes
    • Schultz: yes
    • Harabedian: yes
    • Patel: yes
    • Zbur: yes
    • Kalra: yes
    • Michelle Rodriguez: yes
    • Sanchez: yes
    • Wilson: yes
    • Nguyen: yes
    • Gipson: yes
    • Celeste Rodriguez: yes
    • Macedo: yes
    • Papan: yes
    • Ransom: yes
    • DeMaio: yes
    • Jeff Gonzalez: yes
    • Castillo: yes
    • Ramos: yes
    • Haney: yes
    • Arambula: yes
    • Garcia: yes
    • Irwin: yes
    • Mark González: yes
    • Muratsuchi: yes
    • Petrie-Norris: yes
    • Addis: yes
    • Lackey: yes
    • Stefani: yes
    • Sharp-Collins: yes
    • Rivas: yes
    • Schiavo: yes
    • Bains: yes
    • Ortega: yes
    • Bauer-Kahan: yes
    • Fong: yes
    • Ávila Farías: yes
    • Jackson: yes
    • Rogers: yes
    • Davies: yes
    • Gabriel: yes
    • Ward: yes
    • Caloza: yes
    • Ahrens: yes
    • Solache: yes
    • Elhawary: other
    • Hoover: other
    • Lowenthal: other
    • McKinnor: other
    • Valencia: other
    • Chen: other
    • Alanis: other
    • Alvarez: other
    • Lee: other
    • Gallagher: other
    • Bryan: other
    • Patterson: other
    • Ellis: other
    • Berman: other
    • Flora: other
  • Unfinished Business SB346 Durazo et al. Concurrence

    2025-09-02 · pass · 40-0

    Member-level votes (40)
    • Alvarado-Gil: yes
    • Cortese: yes
    • Pérez: yes
    • Strickland: yes
    • Wiener: yes
    • Caballero: yes
    • Smallwood-Cuevas: yes
    • Ochoa Bogh: yes
    • Hurtado: yes
    • Reyes: yes
    • Rubio: yes
    • Seyarto: yes
    • Arreguín: yes
    • Wahab: yes
    • Durazo: yes
    • Padilla: yes
    • Laird: yes
    • McGuire: yes
    • Menjivar: yes
    • Jones: yes
    • Umberg: yes
    • Archuleta: yes
    • Choi: yes
    • Gonzalez: yes
    • Weber Pierson: yes
    • Cervantes: yes
    • Blakespear: yes
    • Becker: yes
    • Ashby: yes
    • Dahle: yes
    • Niello: yes
    • Richardson: yes
    • Grove: yes
    • Allen: yes
    • McNerney: yes
    • Stern: yes
    • Grayson: yes
    • Valladares: yes
    • Limón: yes
    • Cabaldon: yes

Related bills

No related bills recorded for this bill.

Official source

Attribution

Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T01:34:27.960412Z

Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:

Use this data

Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=CA&identifier=SB 346. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.

Known limitations

  • Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
  • Committee referrals are not yet captured.
  • Some documents have no extracted text yet, so version comparison may be limited.

See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.