Bill Commons

CA SB 323

in committee

Student Aid Commission: California Dream Act application.

California · 2025-2026 Regular Session · upper

Quick answers

Did CA SB 323 pass?

Not yet. CA SB 323 is in committee as of 2025-08-29 and has not come to a final vote. Latest recorded action (2025-08-29): August 29 hearing postponed by committee.

What is CA SB 323 about?

Existing law exempts a student, other than a nonimmigrant alien, as defined, from paying nonresident tuition at the California State University and the California Community Colleges if the student meets certain requirements. Existing law makes a student who meets these requirements for exemption from nonresident tuition, or who meets equivalent requirements adopted by the Regents of the University of California, eligible to apply for, and participate in, any student financial aid program administered by the state to the full extent permitted by federal law. Existing law requires the Student Aid Commission to establish procedures and forms that enable these students to apply for, and participate in, those student financial aid programs. This bill would require the commission, by the start of the 2026–27 financial aid cycle, to amend the California Dream Act application, and any of its grant processing systems, to clarify and ensure that the application can be used by any student eligible for state financial aid programs, regardless of their eligibility for federal financial aid. The bill would also require the commission to consult with California's public and private colleges and universities to promote the California Dream Act application effectively and inform students and their families of their available financial aid application options, as provided.

Who sponsors CA SB 323?

Pérez is the primary sponsor of CA SB 323, joined by 4 cosponsors.

Description

Existing law exempts a student, other than a nonimmigrant alien, as defined, from paying nonresident tuition at the California State University and the California Community Colleges if the student meets certain requirements. Existing law makes a student who meets these requirements for exemption from nonresident tuition, or who meets equivalent requirements adopted by the Regents of the University of California, eligible to apply for, and participate in, any student financial aid program administered by the state to the full extent permitted by federal law. Existing law requires the Student Aid Commission to establish procedures and forms that enable these students to apply for, and participate in, those student financial aid programs. This bill would require the commission, by the start of the 2026–27 financial aid cycle, to amend the California Dream Act application, and any of its grant processing systems, to clarify and ensure that the application can be used by any student eligible for state financial aid programs, regardless of their eligibility for federal financial aid. The bill would also require the commission to consult with California's public and private colleges and universities to promote the California Dream Act application effectively and inform students and their families of their available financial aid application options, as provided.

Introduced
2025-02-11
Latest action
2025-08-29 — August 29 hearing postponed by committee.
Bill type
bill
Last updated

Subjects

Sponsors

  • Pérezauthor
  • Caballerocoauthor
  • Cervantescoauthor
  • Garciacoauthor
  • Solachecoauthor

Committees

Not provided by source.

Action timeline

  1. 2025-02-11

    Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

    introduction,reading-1,referral-committee

  2. 2025-02-12

    From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 14.

  3. 2025-02-19

    Referred to Com. on RLS.

    referral-committee

  4. 2025-03-25

    From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.

    amendment-passage,committee-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee

  5. 2025-04-02

    Re-referred to Com. on ED.

    referral-committee

  6. 2025-04-04

    Set for hearing April 23.

  7. 2025-04-23

    From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0. Page 865.) (April 23). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

    committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable,referral-committee

  8. 2025-04-25

    Set for hearing May 5.

  9. 2025-05-05

    May 5 hearing: Placed on APPR. suspense file.

  10. 2025-05-16

    Set for hearing May 23.

  11. 2025-05-23

    Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

    reading-1,reading-2,reading-3

  12. 2025-05-23

    From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 1196.) (May 23).

    committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable

  13. 2025-06-02

    Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 31. Noes 1. Page 1365.) Ordered to the Assembly.

    passage,reading-1,reading-3

  14. 2025-06-03

    In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

    reading-1

  15. 2025-06-09

    Referred to Com. on HIGHER ED.

    referral-committee

  16. 2025-07-09

    From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 2.) (July 8).

    amendment-passage,committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable,referral-committee

  17. 2025-07-10

    Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

    amendment-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee

  18. 2025-08-20

    August 20 set for first hearing. Placed on APPR. suspense file.

  19. 2025-08-29

    August 29 hearing postponed by committee.

Versions

  • 02/11/25 - Introduced — 2025-02-11Compare
  • 03/25/25 - Amended Senate — 2025-03-25Compare
  • 07/10/25 - Amended Assembly — 2025-07-10Compare
  • SB323Compare
  • (document, no version)Compare

Documents

Votes

  • Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]

    2025-04-23 · pass · 6-0

    Member-level votes (7)
    • Cortese: yes
    • Cabaldon: yes
    • Pérez: yes
    • Laird: yes
    • Ochoa Bogh: yes
    • Gonzalez: yes
    • Choi: other
  • Placed on suspense file

    2025-05-05 · pass · 7-0

    Member-level votes (7)
    • Richardson: yes
    • Grayson: yes
    • Seyarto: yes
    • Caballero: yes
    • Dahle: yes
    • Cabaldon: yes
    • Wahab: yes
  • Do pass

    2025-05-23 · pass · 5-0

    Member-level votes (7)
    • Caballero: yes
    • Wahab: yes
    • Cabaldon: yes
    • Richardson: yes
    • Grayson: yes
    • Dahle: other
    • Seyarto: other
  • 3rd Reading

    2025-06-02 · pass · 31-1

    Member-level votes (40)
    • Menjivar: yes
    • Pérez: yes
    • Rubio: yes
    • Padilla: yes
    • Alvarado-Gil: yes
    • Cervantes: yes
    • Wahab: yes
    • Smallwood-Cuevas: yes
    • Wiener: yes
    • Grayson: yes
    • Cortese: yes
    • Ashby: yes
    • Gonzalez: yes
    • Arreguín: yes
    • Archuleta: yes
    • Umberg: yes
    • Becker: yes
    • Laird: yes
    • Durazo: yes
    • McGuire: yes
    • Ochoa Bogh: yes
    • Blakespear: yes
    • McNerney: yes
    • Limón: yes
    • Allen: yes
    • Valladares: yes
    • Caballero: yes
    • Stern: yes
    • Weber Pierson: yes
    • Cabaldon: yes
    • Richardson: yes
    • Strickland: no
    • Niello: other
    • Seyarto: other
    • Reyes: other
    • Grove: other
    • Dahle: other
    • Choi: other
    • Jones: other
    • Hurtado: other
  • Do pass as amended and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]

    2025-07-08 · pass · 8-2

    Member-level votes (10)
    • Sharp-Collins: yes
    • Celeste Rodriguez: yes
    • Jackson: yes
    • Jeff Gonzalez: yes
    • Boerner: yes
    • Fong: yes
    • Patel: yes
    • Muratsuchi: yes
    • Tangipa: no
    • DeMaio: no

Related bills

No related bills recorded for this bill.

Official source

Attribution

Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T01:34:27.960412Z

Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:

Use this data

Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=CA&identifier=SB 323. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.

Known limitations

  • Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
  • Committee referrals are not yet captured.
  • Some documents have no extracted text yet, so version comparison may be limited.

See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.