CA SB 272
enactedSan Mateo County Transit District: job order contracting: pilot program.
California · 2025-2026 Regular Session · upper
Subscribe in a feed reader. The feed covers recorded actions from the last 30 days; Bill Commons may record an action after it happened at the legislature.
Quick answers
Did CA SB 272 pass?
Yes. CA SB 272 has been enacted into law. Latest recorded action (2025-10-03): Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 310, Statutes of 2025.
What is CA SB 272 about?
The Local Agency Public Construction Act sets forth procedures that a local agency is required to follow when procuring certain services or work. The act also sets forth specific public contracting requirements for certain transit districts, including the San Mateo County Transit District for construction work contracts. The act authorizes certain local agencies, including school districts and community college districts, to engage in job order contracting, as prescribed. This bill would establish a pilot program to authorize the San Mateo County Transit District to use job order contracting as a procurement method. The bill would impose a $5,000,000 cap on awards under a single job order contract and a $1,000,000 cap on any single job order. The bill would limit the term of an initial contract to a maximum of 12 months, with extensions as prescribed. The bill would establish various procedures and requirements for the use of job order contracting under the pilot program. The bill would require the district, on or before January 1, 2030, to submit to the appropriate policy and fiscal committees of the Legislature a report on the use of job order contracting under the bill. The pilot program would be repealed on January 1, 2032. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the San Mateo County Transit District.
Who sponsors CA SB 272?
Becker is the primary sponsor of CA SB 272, joined by 2 cosponsors.
Description
The Local Agency Public Construction Act sets forth procedures that a local agency is required to follow when procuring certain services or work. The act also sets forth specific public contracting requirements for certain transit districts, including the San Mateo County Transit District for construction work contracts. The act authorizes certain local agencies, including school districts and community college districts, to engage in job order contracting, as prescribed. This bill would establish a pilot program to authorize the San Mateo County Transit District to use job order contracting as a procurement method. The bill would impose a $5,000,000 cap on awards under a single job order contract and a $1,000,000 cap on any single job order. The bill would limit the term of an initial contract to a maximum of 12 months, with extensions as prescribed. The bill would establish various procedures and requirements for the use of job order contracting under the pilot program. The bill would require the district, on or before January 1, 2030, to submit to the appropriate policy and fiscal committees of the Legislature a report on the use of job order contracting under the bill. The pilot program would be repealed on January 1, 2032. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the San Mateo County Transit District.
- Introduced
- 2025-02-04
- Latest action
- 2025-10-03 — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 310, Statutes of 2025.
- Bill type
- bill
- Last updated
- —
Subjects
Sponsors
- Beckerauthor
- Bermancoauthor
- Stefanicoauthor
Committees
Not provided by source.
Action timeline
Newest first
2025-10-03
Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 310, Statutes of 2025.
became-law
2025-10-03
Approved by the Governor.
executive-signature
2025-09-09
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 2 p.m.
executive-receipt
2025-09-03
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 40. Noes 0. Page 2442.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
amendment-passage,committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable
2025-08-28
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
2025-08-28
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 75. Noes 1. Page 2765.) Ordered to the Senate.
passage,reading-1,reading-3
2025-08-20
Read third time and amended.
amendment-passage,reading-1,reading-3
2025-08-20
Ordered to third reading.
reading-1,reading-3
2025-06-23
Ordered to third reading.
reading-1,reading-3
2025-06-23
From consent calendar on motion of Assembly Member Aguiar-Curry.
2025-06-19
Read second time. Ordered to consent calendar.
reading-1,reading-2
2025-06-18
From committee: Do pass. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (June 18).
committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable
2025-05-12
Referred to Com. on L. GOV.
referral-committee
2025-04-01
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
reading-1
2025-04-01
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 39. Noes 0. Page 603.) Ordered to the Assembly.
passage,reading-1,reading-3
2025-03-27
Read second time. Ordered to consent calendar.
reading-1,reading-2
2025-03-26
From committee: Do pass. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 14. Noes 0. Page 534.) (March 25).
committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable
2025-03-18
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on TRANS.
amendment-passage,committee-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee
2025-03-11
Set for hearing March 25.
2025-02-14
Referred to Com. on TRANS.
referral-committee
2025-02-05
From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 7.
2025-02-04
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
introduction,reading-1,referral-committee
Versions
Documents
- application/pdf
- application/pdf
- application/pdf
- application/pdf
- application/pdf
- text/html
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
Votes
Do pass and be ordered to the Consent Calendar
2025-03-25 · pass · 14-0
Member-level votes (15)
- Limón: yes
- Seyarto: yes
- Archuleta: yes
- Strickland: yes
- Gonzalez: yes
- Cortese: yes
- Arreguín: yes
- Cervantes: yes
- Blakespear: yes
- Umberg: yes
- Richardson: yes
- Valladares: yes
- Menjivar: yes
- Grayson: yes
- Dahle: other
Consent Calendar 2nd
2025-04-01 · pass · 39-0
Member-level votes (40)
- Cabaldon: yes
- Strickland: yes
- Smallwood-Cuevas: yes
- Wiener: yes
- Ashby: yes
- Becker: yes
- Allen: yes
- Hurtado: yes
- Valladares: yes
- Dahle: yes
- Durazo: yes
- Grayson: yes
- Cervantes: yes
- Umberg: yes
- Caballero: yes
- Ochoa Bogh: yes
- Wahab: yes
- Stern: yes
- McNerney: yes
- Gonzalez: yes
- Laird: yes
- McGuire: yes
- Pérez: yes
- Richardson: yes
- Rubio: yes
- Arreguín: yes
- Cortese: yes
- Menjivar: yes
- Grove: yes
- Jones: yes
- Padilla: yes
- Seyarto: yes
- Choi: yes
- Weber Pierson: yes
- Blakespear: yes
- Limón: yes
- Archuleta: yes
- Niello: yes
- Alvarado-Gil: yes
- Reyes: other
Do pass. To Consent Calendar.
2025-06-18 · pass · 10-0
Member-level votes (10)
- Ta: yes
- Hoover: yes
- Pacheco: yes
- Ransom: yes
- Haney: yes
- Carrillo: yes
- Blanca Rubio: yes
- Stefani: yes
- Wilson: yes
- Ramos: yes
SB 272 Becker Senate Third Reading By Stefani
2025-08-28 · pass · 75-1
Member-level votes (79)
- Michelle Rodriguez: yes
- Zbur: yes
- Jeff Gonzalez: yes
- Carrillo: yes
- Stefani: yes
- Dixon: yes
- Krell: yes
- Muratsuchi: yes
- Ransom: yes
- Schiavo: yes
- Ahrens: yes
- Tangipa: yes
- Chen: yes
- Blanca Rubio: yes
- Bryan: yes
- Papan: yes
- Lee: yes
- Soria: yes
- Ellis: yes
- Bonta: yes
- Addis: yes
- Aguiar-Curry: yes
- Garcia: yes
- Hadwick: yes
- Hart: yes
- Ortega: yes
- Bauer-Kahan: yes
- Nguyen: yes
- Mark González: yes
- Solache: yes
- Gabriel: yes
- Bennett: yes
- Castillo: yes
- Irwin: yes
- Pellerin: yes
- Harabedian: yes
- Ward: yes
- Schultz: yes
- Calderon: yes
- Ta: yes
- Alanis: yes
- Pacheco: yes
- Macedo: yes
- Wicks: yes
- Connolly: yes
- Bains: yes
- Flora: yes
- Sanchez: yes
- Jackson: yes
- Lackey: yes
- Patel: yes
- Gallagher: yes
- Davies: yes
- Kalra: yes
- Celeste Rodriguez: yes
- McKinnor: yes
- Petrie-Norris: yes
- Ávila Farías: yes
- Caloza: yes
- Sharp-Collins: yes
- Elhawary: yes
- Wilson: yes
- Hoover: yes
- Fong: yes
- Gipson: yes
- Patterson: yes
- Quirk-Silva: yes
- Rivas: yes
- Rogers: yes
- Boerner: yes
- Arambula: yes
- Ramos: yes
- Lowenthal: yes
- Haney: yes
- Wallis: yes
- DeMaio: no
- Alvarez: other
- Berman: other
- Valencia: other
Unfinished Business SB272 Becker et al. Concurrence
2025-09-03 · pass · 40-0
Member-level votes (40)
- Becker: yes
- Arreguín: yes
- Durazo: yes
- Gonzalez: yes
- Stern: yes
- Cabaldon: yes
- Blakespear: yes
- Rubio: yes
- Hurtado: yes
- Ashby: yes
- Limón: yes
- Wiener: yes
- Allen: yes
- Valladares: yes
- Padilla: yes
- McNerney: yes
- Pérez: yes
- Cortese: yes
- Smallwood-Cuevas: yes
- Dahle: yes
- Choi: yes
- Menjivar: yes
- Strickland: yes
- Grayson: yes
- McGuire: yes
- Niello: yes
- Cervantes: yes
- Weber Pierson: yes
- Richardson: yes
- Archuleta: yes
- Laird: yes
- Ochoa Bogh: yes
- Seyarto: yes
- Jones: yes
- Alvarado-Gil: yes
- Grove: yes
- Wahab: yes
- Umberg: yes
- Reyes: yes
- Caballero: yes
Related bills
No related bills recorded for this bill.
Official source
Attribution
Data from openstates_api_sync, retrieved 2026-09-16T06:57:05.061612Z
Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:
Session-wide evidence can include changes to other bills:
Use this data
Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=CA&identifier=SB 272. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.
Known limitations
- Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
- Committee referrals are not yet captured.
- Some documents have no extracted text yet, so version comparison may be limited.
See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.