CA HR 66

passed one chamber

Relative to National 4-H Week.

California · 2025-2026 Regular Session · lower

Follow this bill’s action updates (Atom)

Subscribe in a feed reader. The feed covers recorded actions from the last 30 days; Bill Commons may record an action after it happened at the legislature.

Quick answers

Did CA HR 66 pass?

Not yet. CA HR 66 has passed one chamber and awaits action in the other. Latest recorded action (2025-09-02): Read. Adopted. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 2819.).

What is CA HR 66 about?

CA HR 66 is a resolution in the 2025-2026 Regular Session titled “Relative to National 4-H Week.”.

Who sponsors CA HR 66?

Aguiar-Curry is the primary sponsor of CA HR 66.

Introduced: 2025-08-27
Latest action: 2025-09-02 — Read. Adopted. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 2819.).
Bill type: resolution
Last updated: —

Committees

Not provided by source.

Action timeline

Newest first

2025-09-02
Read. Adopted. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 2819.).
amendment-passage,passage,reading-1
2025-08-28
Referred to Com. on RLS.
referral-committee
2025-08-28
From committee: Be adopted. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (August 28).
amendment-passage,committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable,passage
2025-08-27
Introduced.
introduction

Versions

08/27/25 - Introduced — 2025-08-27Compare
HR66Compare
(document, no version)Compare

Documents

Votes

Be adopted. To Consent Calendar.
2025-08-28 · pass · 9-0
Member-level votes (11)
- Michelle Rodriguez: yes
- Zbur: yes
- Pacheco: yes
- Krell: yes
- Sanchez: yes
- Mark González: yes
- Ahrens: yes
- Patel: yes
- Irwin: yes
- Lackey: other
- Flora: other
HR 66 Aguiar-Curry Consent Calendar Second Day
2025-09-02 · pass · 78-0
Member-level votes (79)
- Alvarez: yes
- Addis: yes
- Alanis: yes
- Valencia: yes
- Harabedian: yes
- Ransom: yes
- Ávila Farías: yes
- Rivas: yes
- Hart: yes
- Kalra: yes
- Hoover: yes
- Wilson: yes
- Zbur: yes
- Tangipa: yes
- Schultz: yes
- Garcia: yes
- DeMaio: yes
- Patel: yes
- Castillo: yes
- Schiavo: yes
- Patterson: yes
- Gabriel: yes
- Michelle Rodriguez: yes
- Irwin: yes
- Sharp-Collins: yes
- Ramos: yes
- Davies: yes
- Lee: yes
- Aguiar-Curry: yes
- Bennett: yes
- Caloza: yes
- Lowenthal: yes
- Macedo: yes
- Dixon: yes
- Krell: yes
- Sanchez: yes
- Bryan: yes
- Ortega: yes
- Jeff Gonzalez: yes
- Chen: yes
- Elhawary: yes
- Bains: yes
- Pacheco: yes
- Gipson: yes
- Papan: yes
- Connolly: yes
- Boerner: yes
- McKinnor: yes
- Wallis: yes
- Stefani: yes
- Ta: yes
- Soria: yes
- Arambula: yes
- Lackey: yes
- Petrie-Norris: yes
- Mark González: yes
- Hadwick: yes
- Ahrens: yes
- Flora: yes
- Nguyen: yes
- Gallagher: yes
- Ellis: yes
- Jackson: yes
- Carrillo: yes
- Fong: yes
- Blanca Rubio: yes
- Quirk-Silva: yes
- Wicks: yes
- Bauer-Kahan: yes
- Muratsuchi: yes
- Haney: yes
- Solache: yes
- Calderon: yes
- Rogers: yes
- Bonta: yes
- Pellerin: yes
- Celeste Rodriguez: yes
- Ward: yes
- Berman: other

Related bills

No related bills recorded for this bill.

Official source

http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260HR66

Attribution

Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T01:34:27.960412Z

Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:

Source and document changes Status and relationship changes

Session-wide evidence can include changes to other bills:

Bulk imports for this session Session dates and activity

Use this data

Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=CA&identifier=HR 66. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.

Known limitations

Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
Committee referrals are not yet captured.
Some documents have no extracted text yet, so version comparison may be limited.

See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.