CA ACR 106
in committeeRelative to Court Adoption and Permanency Month.
California · 2025-2026 Regular Session · lower
Quick answers
Did CA ACR 106 pass?
Not yet. CA ACR 106 is in committee as of 2025-09-13 and has not come to a final vote. Latest recorded action (2025-09-13): Ordered to inactive file at the request of Senator Grayson.
What is CA ACR 106 about?
This measure would declare November 2025 as Court Adoption and Permanency Month.
Who sponsors CA ACR 106?
Kalra is the primary sponsor of CA ACR 106, joined by 1 cosponsor.
Description
This measure would declare November 2025 as Court Adoption and Permanency Month.
- Introduced
- 2025-07-10
- Latest action
- 2025-09-13 — Ordered to inactive file at the request of Senator Grayson.
- Bill type
- concurrent resolution
- Last updated
- —
Subjects
Sponsors
- Kalraauthor
- Ashbyprincipal coauthor
Committees
Not provided by source.
Action timeline
2025-07-10
Introduced. To print.
introduction
2025-07-11
From printer.
2025-07-14
From committee: Be adopted. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (July 14).
amendment-passage,committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable,passage
2025-07-14
Referred to Com. on RLS.
referral-committee
2025-07-17
Adopted and to Senate. (Ayes 75. Noes 0. Page 2594.)
amendment-passage,passage
2025-07-17
In Senate. To Com. on RLS.
referral-committee
2025-08-20
From committee: Ordered to third reading.
committee-passage,reading-1,reading-3
2025-09-13
Ordered to inactive file at the request of Senator Grayson.
Versions
Documents
- application/pdf
- text/html
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
Votes
Be adopted. To Consent Calendar.
2025-07-14 · pass · 10-0
Member-level votes (11)
- Pacheco: yes
- Irwin: yes
- Zbur: yes
- Patel: yes
- Lackey: yes
- Michelle Rodriguez: yes
- Ahrens: yes
- Krell: yes
- Sanchez: yes
- Mark González: yes
- Flora: other
ACR 106 Kalra Consent Calendar Second Day
2025-07-17 · pass · 75-0
Member-level votes (79)
- Hart: yes
- Flora: yes
- DeMaio: yes
- Harabedian: yes
- Ward: yes
- Rogers: yes
- Irwin: yes
- Macedo: yes
- Haney: yes
- Caloza: yes
- Celeste Rodriguez: yes
- Krell: yes
- Muratsuchi: yes
- Zbur: yes
- Mark González: yes
- Fong: yes
- Bonta: yes
- Soria: yes
- Wallis: yes
- Connolly: yes
- Hoover: yes
- Kalra: yes
- Patel: yes
- Sanchez: yes
- Schiavo: yes
- Pellerin: yes
- Bains: yes
- Addis: yes
- Solache: yes
- Ávila Farías: yes
- Blanca Rubio: yes
- Bryan: yes
- Jackson: yes
- Gabriel: yes
- Pacheco: yes
- Bauer-Kahan: yes
- Jeff Gonzalez: yes
- Michelle Rodriguez: yes
- Lowenthal: yes
- Sharp-Collins: yes
- Quirk-Silva: yes
- Rivas: yes
- Patterson: yes
- Petrie-Norris: yes
- Papan: yes
- Castillo: yes
- Valencia: yes
- Elhawary: yes
- Ta: yes
- Ortega: yes
- Schultz: yes
- Lee: yes
- Arambula: yes
- Carrillo: yes
- Dixon: yes
- Ramos: yes
- Alanis: yes
- Garcia: yes
- Ransom: yes
- Stefani: yes
- Ellis: yes
- Aguiar-Curry: yes
- Davies: yes
- Lackey: yes
- McKinnor: yes
- Ahrens: yes
- Hadwick: yes
- Boerner: yes
- Nguyen: yes
- Wicks: yes
- Calderon: yes
- Chen: yes
- Gipson: yes
- Wilson: yes
- Tangipa: yes
- Alvarez: other
- Bennett: other
- Berman: other
- Gallagher: other
Related bills
No related bills recorded for this bill.
Official source
Attribution
Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T01:34:27.960412Z
Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:
Use this data
Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=CA&identifier=ACR 106. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.
Known limitations
- Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
- Committee referrals are not yet captured.
- Some documents have no extracted text yet, so version comparison may be limited.
See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.