Bill Commons

CA AB 989

dead

State holidays: Native American Day.

California · 2025-2026 Regular Session · lower

Follow this bill’s action updates (Atom)

Subscribe in a feed reader. The feed covers recorded actions from the last 30 days; Bill Commons may record an action after it happened at the legislature.

Quick answers

Did CA AB 989 pass?

No. CA AB 989 did not pass — it was defeated or died in the legislative process. Latest recorded action (2026-02-02): From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.

What is CA AB 989 about?

Existing law includes the 4th Friday in September, known as "Native American Day," as a state holiday. This bill would provide that the 4th Friday in September, known as "Native American Day," is a paid holiday for state employees, as specified.

Who sponsors CA AB 989?

Ramos is the primary sponsor of CA AB 989, joined by 3 cosponsors.

Description

Existing law includes the 4th Friday in September, known as "Native American Day," as a state holiday. This bill would provide that the 4th Friday in September, known as "Native American Day," is a paid holiday for state employees, as specified.

Introduced
—
Latest action
2026-02-02 — From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
Bill type
bill
Last updated
—

Subjects

Sponsors

  • Ramosauthor
  • Cervantesprincipal coauthor
  • McKinnorcoauthor
  • Nguyencoauthor

Committees

Not provided by source.

Action timeline

Newest first

  1. 2026-02-02

    From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.

    committee-passage,failure

  2. 2026-01-31

    Died pursuant to Art. IV, Sec. 10(c) of the Constitution.

    failure

  3. 2025-05-23

    In committee: Held under submission.

  4. 2025-05-07

    In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.

    referral-committee

  5. 2025-04-23

    Coauthors revised.

  6. 2025-04-23

    From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (April 23). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

    committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable,referral-committee

  7. 2025-04-03

    From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on P. E. & R. (Ayes 20. Noes 0.) (April 2). Re-referred to Com. on P. E. & R.

    committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable,referral-committee

  8. 2025-03-10

    Referred to Coms. on G.O. and P. E. & R.

    referral-committee

  9. 2025-02-21

    From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.

  10. 2025-02-20

    Read first time. To print.

    reading-1

Versions

Documents

Votes

  • Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Public Employment and Retirement]

    2025-04-02 · pass · 20-0

    Member-level votes (22)
    • Davies: yes
    • Dixon: yes
    • Bryan: yes
    • McKinnor: yes
    • Sanchez: yes
    • Ta: yes
    • Gabriel: yes
    • Nguyen: yes
    • Alvarez: yes
    • Wallis: yes
    • Fong: yes
    • Gipson: yes
    • Solache: yes
    • Valencia: yes
    • Ramos: yes
    • Pacheco: yes
    • Berman: yes
    • Michelle Rodriguez: yes
    • Blanca Rubio: yes
    • Soria: yes
    • Carrillo: other
    • DeMaio: other
  • Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]

    2025-04-23 · pass · 7-0

    Member-level votes (7)
    • Garcia: yes
    • Boerner: yes
    • McKinnor: yes
    • Alanis: yes
    • Nguyen: yes
    • Lackey: yes
    • Elhawary: yes

Related bills

No related bills recorded for this bill.

Official source

Attribution

Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T01:34:27.960412Z

Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:

Session-wide evidence can include changes to other bills:

Use this data

Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=CA&identifier=AB 989. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.

Known limitations

  • Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
  • Committee referrals are not yet captured.
  • Some documents have no extracted text yet, so version comparison may be limited.

See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.