Bill Commons

CA AB 968

introduced

Contraceptives.

California · 2025-2026 Regular Session · lower

Quick answers

Did CA AB 968 pass?

Not yet. CA AB 968 has been introduced as of 2025-09-13 but has not advanced to a vote. Latest recorded action (2025-09-13): Ordered to inactive file at the request of Senator Pérez.

What is CA AB 968 about?

Existing law, the Pharmacy Law, establishes, in the Department of Consumer Affairs, the California State Board of Pharmacy to license and regulate the practice of pharmacy. Existing law authorizes a physician and surgeon, nurse practitioner, registered nurse, and specified other health care practitioners acting within the scope of their practice to use a self-screening tool to identify patient risk factors for the use of self-administered hormonal contraceptives by a patient and, after examination, to prescribe, furnish, or dispense self-administered hormonal contraceptives to the patient. This bill would, instead, make those provisions applicable to contraceptives. Existing law authorizes a pharmacist to furnish self-administered hormonal contraceptives in accordance with standardized procedures or protocols developed and approved by both the California State Board of Pharmacy and the Medical Board of California, in consultation with specified other entities. This bill would authorize a pharmacist to also furnish federal Food and Drug Administration-approved nonhormonal contraceptives in accordance with those standardized procedures or protocols. The bill would require a pharmacist, for each federal Food and Drug Administration-approved nonhormonal contraceptives initiated, to provide the recipient with a standardized fact sheet, as specified. Existing law prohibits a pharmacist, pharmacist's employer, or pharmacist's agent from directly charging a patient a separate consultation fee for emergency contraception drug therapy services and requires the pharmacist to disclose the total retail price of the emergency contraception drug therapy. Existing law makes those provisions inoperative for dedicated emergency contraception drugs if these drugs are reclassified as over-the-counter products by the federal Food and Drug Administration. This bill would delete those provisions. Existing law requires a pharmacist to dispense, at a patient's request, up to a 12-month supply of an FDA-approved, self-administered hormonal contraceptive. This bill would, instead, make those provisions applicable to contraceptives. This bill would make related conforming changes.

Who sponsors CA AB 968?

Boerner is the primary sponsor of CA AB 968.

Description

Existing law, the Pharmacy Law, establishes, in the Department of Consumer Affairs, the California State Board of Pharmacy to license and regulate the practice of pharmacy. Existing law authorizes a physician and surgeon, nurse practitioner, registered nurse, and specified other health care practitioners acting within the scope of their practice to use a self-screening tool to identify patient risk factors for the use of self-administered hormonal contraceptives by a patient and, after examination, to prescribe, furnish, or dispense self-administered hormonal contraceptives to the patient. This bill would, instead, make those provisions applicable to contraceptives. Existing law authorizes a pharmacist to furnish self-administered hormonal contraceptives in accordance with standardized procedures or protocols developed and approved by both the California State Board of Pharmacy and the Medical Board of California, in consultation with specified other entities. This bill would authorize a pharmacist to also furnish federal Food and Drug Administration-approved nonhormonal contraceptives in accordance with those standardized procedures or protocols. The bill would require a pharmacist, for each federal Food and Drug Administration-approved nonhormonal contraceptives initiated, to provide the recipient with a standardized fact sheet, as specified. Existing law prohibits a pharmacist, pharmacist's employer, or pharmacist's agent from directly charging a patient a separate consultation fee for emergency contraception drug therapy services and requires the pharmacist to disclose the total retail price of the emergency contraception drug therapy. Existing law makes those provisions inoperative for dedicated emergency contraception drugs if these drugs are reclassified as over-the-counter products by the federal Food and Drug Administration. This bill would delete those provisions. Existing law requires a pharmacist to dispense, at a patient's request, up to a 12-month supply of an FDA-approved, self-administered hormonal contraceptive. This bill would, instead, make those provisions applicable to contraceptives. This bill would make related conforming changes.

Introduced
2025-04-07
Latest action
2025-09-13 — Ordered to inactive file at the request of Senator Pérez.
Bill type
bill
Last updated

Subjects

Sponsors

  • Boernerauthor

Committees

Not provided by source.

Action timeline

  1. 2025-02-20

    Read first time. To print.

    reading-1

  2. 2025-02-21

    From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.

  3. 2025-03-10

    Referred to Com. on TRANS.

    referral-committee

  4. 2025-04-07

    In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

  5. 2025-04-07

    From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on TRANS. Read second time and amended.

    amendment-introduction,amendment-passage,committee-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee

  6. 2025-04-08

    Re-referred to Com. on TRANS.

    referral-committee

  7. 2025-04-10

    Re-referred to Com. on B. & P. pursuant to Assembly Rule 96.

    referral-committee

  8. 2025-04-29

    From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (April 29). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

    committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable,referral-committee

  9. 2025-05-14

    In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.

  10. 2025-05-21

    From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (May 21).

    committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable

  11. 2025-05-22

    Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

    reading-1,reading-2,reading-3

  12. 2025-05-27

    Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 77. Noes 0. Page 1737.)

    passage,reading-1,reading-3

  13. 2025-05-28

    In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

    reading-1,referral-committee

  14. 2025-06-04

    Referred to Com. on B. P. & E.D.

    referral-committee

  15. 2025-06-09

    From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on B. P. & E.D.

    amendment-introduction,amendment-passage,committee-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee

  16. 2025-06-11

    In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.

  17. 2025-06-23

    In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.

  18. 2025-07-03

    In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

  19. 2025-07-09

    From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on B. P. & E.D.

    amendment-introduction,amendment-passage,committee-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee

  20. 2025-07-14

    From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (July 14). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

    committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable,referral-committee

  21. 2025-08-19

    From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.

    committee-passage,reading-1,reading-2

  22. 2025-08-20

    Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

    reading-1,reading-2,reading-3

  23. 2025-09-13

    Ordered to inactive file at the request of Senator Pérez.

Versions

  • 02/20/25 - Introduced — 2025-02-20Compare
  • 04/07/25 - Amended Assembly — 2025-04-07Compare
  • 06/09/25 - Amended Senate — 2025-06-09Compare
  • 07/09/25 - Amended Senate — 2025-07-09Compare
  • AB968Compare
  • (document, no version)Compare

Documents

Votes

  • Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]

    2025-04-29 · pass · 17-0

    Member-level votes (18)
    • Caloza: yes
    • Bains: yes
    • Elhawary: yes
    • Jackson: yes
    • Krell: yes
    • Ahrens: yes
    • Macedo: yes
    • Nguyen: yes
    • Flora: yes
    • Bauer-Kahan: yes
    • Wilson: yes
    • Chen: yes
    • Lowenthal: yes
    • Pellerin: yes
    • Berman: yes
    • Irwin: yes
    • Alanis: yes
    • Hadwick: other
  • Do pass.

    2025-05-21 · pass · 15-0

    Member-level votes (15)
    • Pellerin: yes
    • Ta: yes
    • Fong: yes
    • Calderon: yes
    • Pacheco: yes
    • Elhawary: yes
    • Tangipa: yes
    • Sanchez: yes
    • Mark González: yes
    • Wicks: yes
    • Arambula: yes
    • Dixon: yes
    • Caloza: yes
    • Solache: yes
    • Hart: yes
  • AB 968 Boerner Assembly Third Reading

    2025-05-27 · pass · 77-0

    Member-level votes (79)
    • Carrillo: yes
    • Mark González: yes
    • Michelle Rodriguez: yes
    • Berman: yes
    • Aguiar-Curry: yes
    • Solache: yes
    • Ellis: yes
    • Fong: yes
    • Irwin: yes
    • Hadwick: yes
    • Kalra: yes
    • Ahrens: yes
    • Celeste Rodriguez: yes
    • Haney: yes
    • Flora: yes
    • Patel: yes
    • Elhawary: yes
    • Alvarez: yes
    • Ortega: yes
    • Bennett: yes
    • Addis: yes
    • Sanchez: yes
    • Bonta: yes
    • Pellerin: yes
    • Lackey: yes
    • Schultz: yes
    • Macedo: yes
    • Rogers: yes
    • Chen: yes
    • Sharp-Collins: yes
    • Ransom: yes
    • Ramos: yes
    • Hoover: yes
    • Harabedian: yes
    • DeMaio: yes
    • Papan: yes
    • Tangipa: yes
    • Jackson: yes
    • Castillo: yes
    • Ávila Farías: yes
    • Gabriel: yes
    • Rivas: yes
    • Calderon: yes
    • Valencia: yes
    • Pacheco: yes
    • Muratsuchi: yes
    • Petrie-Norris: yes
    • Schiavo: yes
    • Gallagher: yes
    • Caloza: yes
    • Patterson: yes
    • Wilson: yes
    • Lowenthal: yes
    • Wicks: yes
    • Hart: yes
    • Wallis: yes
    • Stefani: yes
    • Blanca Rubio: yes
    • Boerner: yes
    • Garcia: yes
    • McKinnor: yes
    • Soria: yes
    • Arambula: yes
    • Alanis: yes
    • Krell: yes
    • Davies: yes
    • Connolly: yes
    • Lee: yes
    • Gipson: yes
    • Bauer-Kahan: yes
    • Quirk-Silva: yes
    • Dixon: yes
    • Ta: yes
    • Bryan: yes
    • Zbur: yes
    • Ward: yes
    • Bains: yes
    • Nguyen: other
    • Jeff Gonzalez: other
  • Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]

    2025-07-14 · pass · 11-0

    Member-level votes (11)
    • Weber Pierson: yes
    • Ashby: yes
    • Archuleta: yes
    • Arreguín: yes
    • Smallwood-Cuevas: yes
    • Niello: yes
    • Menjivar: yes
    • Grayson: yes
    • Umberg: yes
    • Choi: yes
    • Strickland: yes

Related bills

No related bills recorded for this bill.

Official source

Attribution

Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T01:34:27.960412Z

Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:

Use this data

Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=CA&identifier=AB 968. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.

Known limitations

  • Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
  • Committee referrals are not yet captured.
  • Some documents have no extracted text yet, so version comparison may be limited.

See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.