Bill Commons

CA AB 954

introduced

Interregional transportation strategic plan: bicycle highways.

California · 2025-2026 Regular Session · lower

Quick answers

Did CA AB 954 pass?

Not yet. CA AB 954 has been introduced as of 2025-08-29 but has not advanced to a vote. Latest recorded action (2025-08-29): Ordered to inactive file at the request of Senator Menjivar.

What is CA AB 954 about?

Existing law establishes the state transportation improvement program (STIP) process, pursuant to which the California Transportation Commission programs, on a biennial basis, available state and federal funds for transportation capital improvement projects, other than state highway rehabilitation and repair projects, for the 5-year period of the STIP, based on the interregional transportation improvement program (ITIP) prepared by the Department of Transportation and the regional transportation improvement programs (RTIP) prepared by regional transportation planning agencies. Existing law requires projects included in the ITIP to be consistent with the interregional transportation strategic plan (ITSP) . Existing law requires the department to submit the ITSP to the commission for approval and requires the ITSP, among other things, to be directed at achieving a high functioning and balanced interregional transportation system and consistent with the California Transportation Plan. This bill would require, to the extent feasible and consistent with the California Transportation Plan, the department to assess incorporating bicycle highways into strategic interregional corridors within the ITSP.

Who sponsors CA AB 954?

Bennett is the primary sponsor of CA AB 954, joined by 1 cosponsor.

Description

Existing law establishes the state transportation improvement program (STIP) process, pursuant to which the California Transportation Commission programs, on a biennial basis, available state and federal funds for transportation capital improvement projects, other than state highway rehabilitation and repair projects, for the 5-year period of the STIP, based on the interregional transportation improvement program (ITIP) prepared by the Department of Transportation and the regional transportation improvement programs (RTIP) prepared by regional transportation planning agencies. Existing law requires projects included in the ITIP to be consistent with the interregional transportation strategic plan (ITSP) . Existing law requires the department to submit the ITSP to the commission for approval and requires the ITSP, among other things, to be directed at achieving a high functioning and balanced interregional transportation system and consistent with the California Transportation Plan. This bill would require, to the extent feasible and consistent with the California Transportation Plan, the department to assess incorporating bicycle highways into strategic interregional corridors within the ITSP.

Introduced
2025-04-09
Latest action
2025-08-29 — Ordered to inactive file at the request of Senator Menjivar.
Bill type
bill
Last updated
—

Subjects

Sponsors

  • Bennettauthor
  • Harabediancoauthor

Committees

Not provided by source.

Action timeline

  1. 2025-02-20

    Read first time. To print.

    reading-1

  2. 2025-02-21

    From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.

  3. 2025-03-10

    Referred to Com. on TRANS.

    referral-committee

  4. 2025-04-08

    Coauthors revised.

  5. 2025-04-08

    From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 12. Noes 4.) (April 7). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

    committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable,referral-committee

  6. 2025-04-09

    Introduced measure version corrected.

    introduction

  7. 2025-05-14

    In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.

    referral-committee

  8. 2025-05-23

    From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 11. Noes 3.) (May 23).

    committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable

  9. 2025-05-27

    Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

    reading-1,reading-2,reading-3

  10. 2025-06-02

    Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 59. Noes 19. Page 1867.)

    passage,reading-1,reading-3

  11. 2025-06-03

    In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

    reading-1,referral-committee

  12. 2025-06-11

    Referred to Com. on TRANS.

    referral-committee

  13. 2025-06-30

    From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on TRANS.

    amendment-introduction,amendment-passage,committee-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee

  14. 2025-07-09

    From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 11. Noes 4.) (July 8). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

    committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable,referral-committee

  15. 2025-08-19

    From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.

    committee-passage,reading-1,reading-2

  16. 2025-08-20

    Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

    reading-1,reading-2,reading-3

  17. 2025-08-29

    Ordered to inactive file at the request of Senator Menjivar.

Versions

Documents

Votes

  • Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]

    2025-04-07 · pass · 12-4

    Member-level votes (16)
    • Carrillo: yes
    • Jackson: yes
    • Lowenthal: yes
    • Harabedian: yes
    • Aguiar-Curry: yes
    • Ahrens: yes
    • Wilson: yes
    • Hart: yes
    • Ransom: yes
    • Papan: yes
    • Ward: yes
    • Rogers: yes
    • Lackey: no
    • Davies: no
    • Hoover: no
    • Macedo: no

  • Do pass.

    2025-05-23 · pass · 11-3

    Member-level votes (15)
    • Calderon: yes
    • Elhawary: yes
    • Hart: yes
    • Mark González: yes
    • Arambula: yes
    • Pacheco: yes
    • Solache: yes
    • Caloza: yes
    • Wicks: yes
    • Pellerin: yes
    • Fong: yes
    • Ta: no
    • Dixon: no
    • Tangipa: no
    • Sanchez: other

  • AB 954 Bennett Assembly Third Reading

    2025-06-02 · pass · 59-19

    Member-level votes (79)
    • Addis: yes
    • Garcia: yes
    • Lee: yes
    • Rivas: yes
    • Petrie-Norris: yes
    • Bryan: yes
    • Michelle Rodriguez: yes
    • Rogers: yes
    • Wicks: yes
    • Irwin: yes
    • Arambula: yes
    • Caloza: yes
    • Ahrens: yes
    • Krell: yes
    • Stefani: yes
    • Harabedian: yes
    • Mark González: yes
    • Calderon: yes
    • Nguyen: yes
    • Ward: yes
    • Carrillo: yes
    • Blanca Rubio: yes
    • Muratsuchi: yes
    • Patel: yes
    • Solache: yes
    • McKinnor: yes
    • Bonta: yes
    • Lowenthal: yes
    • Papan: yes
    • Schiavo: yes
    • Gabriel: yes
    • Pacheco: yes
    • Ávila Farías: yes
    • Aguiar-Curry: yes
    • Ransom: yes
    • Connolly: yes
    • Celeste Rodriguez: yes
    • Fong: yes
    • Quirk-Silva: yes
    • Ramos: yes
    • Soria: yes
    • Pellerin: yes
    • Elhawary: yes
    • Kalra: yes
    • Haney: yes
    • Gipson: yes
    • Hart: yes
    • Boerner: yes
    • Alvarez: yes
    • Bauer-Kahan: yes
    • Schultz: yes
    • Sharp-Collins: yes
    • Berman: yes
    • Jackson: yes
    • Wilson: yes
    • Zbur: yes
    • Bennett: yes
    • Ortega: yes
    • Valencia: yes
    • Gallagher: no
    • Patterson: no
    • Chen: no
    • Ellis: no
    • Jeff Gonzalez: no
    • Dixon: no
    • DeMaio: no
    • Wallis: no
    • Tangipa: no
    • Davies: no
    • Alanis: no
    • Macedo: no
    • Castillo: no
    • Sanchez: no
    • Hoover: no
    • Lackey: no
    • Ta: no
    • Flora: no
    • Hadwick: no
    • Bains: other

  • Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]

    2025-07-08 · pass · 11-4

    Member-level votes (15)
    • Arreguín: yes
    • Archuleta: yes
    • Blakespear: yes
    • Grayson: yes
    • Cortese: yes
    • Limón: yes
    • Gonzalez: yes
    • Menjivar: yes
    • Richardson: yes
    • Cervantes: yes
    • Umberg: yes
    • Seyarto: no
    • Valladares: no
    • Strickland: no
    • Dahle: no

Related bills

No related bills recorded for this bill.

Official source

http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260AB954

Attribution

Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T01:34:27.960412Z

Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:

Source and document changesStatus and relationship changes

Use this data

Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=CA&identifier=AB 954. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.

Known limitations

  • Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
  • Committee referrals are not yet captured.
  • Some documents have no extracted text yet, so version comparison may be limited.

See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.