Bill Commons

CA AB 909

dead

Financial abuse of an elder or dependent adult: fraudulent transactions: liability.

California · 2025-2026 Regular Session · lower

Follow this bill’s action updates (Atom)

Subscribe in a feed reader. The feed covers recorded actions from the last 30 days; Bill Commons may record an action after it happened at the legislature.

Quick answers

Did CA AB 909 pass?

No. CA AB 909 did not pass — it was defeated or died in the legislative process. Latest recorded action (2026-02-02): From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.

What is CA AB 909 about?

Existing law, the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) , provides that, unless displaced by the particular provisions of the UCC, the principles of law and equity, including the law merchant and the law relative to capacity to contract, principal and agent, estoppel, fraud, misrepresentation, duress, coercion, mistake, bankruptcy, and other validating or invalidating cause supplement the UCC. Existing law generally regulates fund transfers, including by prescribing rules applicable to a transfer pursuant to a security procedure for the detection of error to a beneficiary not intended by the sender. This bill would similarly specify that those fund transfer provisions do not displace those principles of law and equity. Existing law requires all officers and employees of a financial institution to report known or suspected instances of financial abuse of an elder or dependent adult, as specified. Existing law imposes a civil penalty for violation of this prohibition in an amount not exceeding $1,000 or, if the failure to report is willful, a civil penalty not exceeding $5,000, as specified. This bill would increase those civil penalties to $10,000 and $50,000, respectively, and would additionally authorize an elder or dependent adult who suffers financial abuse because of the noncompliance to recover those civil penalties. This bill would also enact various provisions related to protecting a victim of abuse of an elder or dependent adult with respect to a fraudulently induced transaction, defined as an "injured consumer," including by limiting the liability of an injured consumer for a fraudulently induced transaction to the lesser of $50 or the amount of money or value of property or services obtained in the fraudulently induced transaction before the financial institution has notice that, or a reasonable basis to believe that, a fraudulently induced transaction involving the injured consumer's account has been, or may be, effected, as prescribed. This bill would also require a financial institution that, within 60 days of transmitting to a consumer certain required documentation related to the consumer's account, receives oral or written notice in which the consumer, among other things, indicates the consumer's belief that the consumer is an injured consumer, to investigate, as prescribed, the alleged reasons and determine whether the consumer is an injured consumer within 10 business days. This bill would authorize an injured consumer to bring a civil action against a noncompliant financial institution, as prescribed.

Who sponsors CA AB 909?

Schiavo is the primary sponsor of CA AB 909.

Description

Existing law, the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) , provides that, unless displaced by the particular provisions of the UCC, the principles of law and equity, including the law merchant and the law relative to capacity to contract, principal and agent, estoppel, fraud, misrepresentation, duress, coercion, mistake, bankruptcy, and other validating or invalidating cause supplement the UCC. Existing law generally regulates fund transfers, including by prescribing rules applicable to a transfer pursuant to a security procedure for the detection of error to a beneficiary not intended by the sender. This bill would similarly specify that those fund transfer provisions do not displace those principles of law and equity. Existing law requires all officers and employees of a financial institution to report known or suspected instances of financial abuse of an elder or dependent adult, as specified. Existing law imposes a civil penalty for violation of this prohibition in an amount not exceeding $1,000 or, if the failure to report is willful, a civil penalty not exceeding $5,000, as specified. This bill would increase those civil penalties to $10,000 and $50,000, respectively, and would additionally authorize an elder or dependent adult who suffers financial abuse because of the noncompliance to recover those civil penalties. This bill would also enact various provisions related to protecting a victim of abuse of an elder or dependent adult with respect to a fraudulently induced transaction, defined as an "injured consumer," including by limiting the liability of an injured consumer for a fraudulently induced transaction to the lesser of $50 or the amount of money or value of property or services obtained in the fraudulently induced transaction before the financial institution has notice that, or a reasonable basis to believe that, a fraudulently induced transaction involving the injured consumer's account has been, or may be, effected, as prescribed. This bill would also require a financial institution that, within 60 days of transmitting to a consumer certain required documentation related to the consumer's account, receives oral or written notice in which the consumer, among other things, indicates the consumer's belief that the consumer is an injured consumer, to investigate, as prescribed, the alleged reasons and determine whether the consumer is an injured consumer within 10 business days. This bill would authorize an injured consumer to bring a civil action against a noncompliant financial institution, as prescribed.

Introduced
2025-03-28
Latest action
2026-02-02 — From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
Bill type
bill
Last updated
—

Subjects

Sponsors

  • Schiavoauthor

Committees

Not provided by source.

Action timeline

Newest first

  1. 2026-02-02

    From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.

    committee-passage,failure

  2. 2026-01-31

    Died pursuant to Art. IV, Sec. 10(c) of the Constitution.

    failure

  3. 2025-04-01

    Re-referred to Com. on B. & F.

    referral-committee

  4. 2025-03-28

    Referred to Coms. on B.&F. and JUD.

    referral-committee

  5. 2025-03-28

    From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on B.&F. Read second time and amended.

    amendment-introduction,amendment-passage,committee-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee

  6. 2025-02-20

    From printer. May be heard in committee March 22.

  7. 2025-02-19

    Read first time. To print.

    reading-1

Versions

Documents

Votes

Not provided by source.

Related bills

No related bills recorded for this bill.

Official source

Attribution

Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T01:34:27.960412Z

Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:

Session-wide evidence can include changes to other bills:

Use this data

Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=CA&identifier=AB 909. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.

Known limitations

  • Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
  • Committee referrals are not yet captured.

See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.