Bill Commons

CA AB 89

dead

Interscholastic sports: gender equity.

California · 2025-2026 Regular Session · lower

Quick answers

Did CA AB 89 pass?

No. CA AB 89 did not pass — it was defeated or died in the legislative process (2025-04-02). Latest recorded action (2025-04-02): From committee: Without further action pursuant to Joint Rule 62(a).

What is CA AB 89 about?

Existing law recognizes the California Interscholastic Federation ("CIF") to be a voluntary organization that consists of school and school-related personnel with responsibility for administering interscholastic athletic activities in secondary schools. Existing law requires the CIF to report, as provided, to the appropriate policy committees of the Legislature and the Governor on its goals and objectives with regard to, and the status of, among other things, gender equity in interscholastic athletics, including, but not limited to, the number of male and female pupils participating in interscholastic athletics in secondary schools, and actions it has taken in order to ensure compliance with Title IX of the federal Education Amendments of 1972. This bill would require the CIF to amend its constitution, bylaws, and policies to prohibit a pupil whose sex was assigned male at birth from participating on a girls' interscholastic sports team.

Who sponsors CA AB 89?

Sanchez is the primary sponsor of CA AB 89.

Description

Existing law recognizes the California Interscholastic Federation ("CIF") to be a voluntary organization that consists of school and school-related personnel with responsibility for administering interscholastic athletic activities in secondary schools. Existing law requires the CIF to report, as provided, to the appropriate policy committees of the Legislature and the Governor on its goals and objectives with regard to, and the status of, among other things, gender equity in interscholastic athletics, including, but not limited to, the number of male and female pupils participating in interscholastic athletics in secondary schools, and actions it has taken in order to ensure compliance with Title IX of the federal Education Amendments of 1972. This bill would require the CIF to amend its constitution, bylaws, and policies to prohibit a pupil whose sex was assigned male at birth from participating on a girls' interscholastic sports team.

Introduced
Latest action
2025-04-02 — From committee: Without further action pursuant to Joint Rule 62(a).
Bill type
bill
Last updated

Subjects

Sponsors

  • Sanchezauthor

Committees

Not provided by source.

Action timeline

  1. 2025-01-06

    Read first time. To print.

    reading-1

  2. 2025-01-07

    From printer. May be heard in committee February 6.

  3. 2025-02-03

    Referred to Coms. on A.,E.,S., & T. and ED.

    referral-committee

  4. 2025-04-01

    In committee: Reconsideration refused.

  5. 2025-04-01

    In committee: Set, first hearing. Failed passage.

    committee-passage-unfavorable

  6. 2025-04-02

    From committee: Without further action pursuant to Joint Rule 62(a).

    committee-passage,failure

Versions

Documents

Votes

  • Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Education]

    2025-04-01 · fail · 2-7

    Member-level votes (9)
    • Jeff Gonzalez: yes
    • Lackey: yes
    • Zbur: no
    • McKinnor: no
    • Quirk-Silva: no
    • Ward: no
    • Rivas: no
    • Ortega: no
    • Elhawary: no
  • Reconsideration.

    2025-04-01 · fail · 2-6

    Member-level votes (9)
    • Jeff Gonzalez: yes
    • Lackey: yes
    • Zbur: no
    • McKinnor: no
    • Quirk-Silva: no
    • Ward: no
    • Ortega: no
    • Elhawary: no
    • Rivas: other

Related bills

No related bills recorded for this bill.

Official source

Attribution

Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T01:34:27.960412Z

Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:

Use this data

Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=CA&identifier=AB 89. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.

Known limitations

  • Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
  • Committee referrals are not yet captured.
  • Some documents have no extracted text yet, so version comparison may be limited.

See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.