Bill Commons

CA AB 851

enacted

Real property transactions: Counties of Los Angeles and Ventura wildfires: unsolicited offers.

California · 2025-2026 Regular Session · lower

Quick answers

Did CA AB 851 pass?

Yes. CA AB 851 has been enacted into law as of 2025-10-10. Latest recorded action (2025-10-10): Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 535, Statutes of 2025.

What is CA AB 851 about?

Existing law regulates sale transactions of real property. On January 7, 2025, the Governor proclaimed a state of emergency to exist in the Counties of Los Angeles and Ventura due to fire and windstorm conditions that caused multiple fires. Executive Order No. N-7-25, signed by the Governor on January 14, 2025, prohibited a buyer from making an unsolicited offer to an owner of real property located in specified ZIP Codes in the County of Los Angeles to purchase the real property for an amount less than what the fair market value of the property was on January 6, 2025. Executive Order No. N-17-25 expanded that prohibition to include real properties in additional specified ZIP Codes. Subsequent executive orders extended the prohibition until July 1, 2025. Existing law makes a violation of the executive order a misdemeanor, as specified. Existing law, the Real Estate Law, provides for the licensure and regulation of real estate brokers and salespersons by the Real Estate Commissioner, the chief officer of the Department of Real Estate within the Business, Consumer Services, and Housing Agency. Existing law makes a willful violation of the Real Estate Law a crime. This bill would prohibit a person, as defined, from making an unsolicited offer to purchase residential real property in certain ZIP Codes in the County of Los Angeles covered by the above-described executive orders and other specified ZIP Codes in the Counties of Los Angeles and Ventura. The bill would define "unsolicited offer to purchase" for this purpose. The bill would require the buyer and seller, before the transfer of title in the purchase of residential real property subject to the above-described prohibition, to execute a written attestation affirming compliance with that prohibition, which, if signed, would create a presumption that the accepted offer was solicited by the seller, as specified. The bill would require the buyer to record the signed attestation as an attachment to the deed or other conveyance of title when recording the transfer of title, as specified. Because the bill would expand the crime of perjury, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. This bill would make a written offer in violation of these provisions by a licensed person under the Real Estate Law on their own behalf, or on behalf of another person while conducting licensed activity, a violation of the person's licensing law, unless SB 641 is enacted and becomes operative, in which case the offer would be a violation of a provision added by SB 641. The bill would authorize the Attorney General, a county counsel, city attorney, or a district attorney to bring a civil action to enforce these provisions. In addition to any other available remedies or penalties, the bill would grant a seller the right to cancel a purchase agreement entered into in violation of these provisions, as specified. The bill would subject a person who violates the above-described prohibition on making an unsolicited offer to purchase real property in those ZIP Codes to an assessment of a civil penalty, and would make the violation a misdemeanor, as specified. By creating new crimes, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. This bill would make these provisions severable, would make these provisions operative 30 days after the effective date of the bill, and would repeal these provisions on January 1, 2027. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the Counties of Los Angeles and Ventura. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.

Who sponsors CA AB 851?

McKinnor is the primary sponsor of CA AB 851.

Description

Existing law regulates sale transactions of real property. On January 7, 2025, the Governor proclaimed a state of emergency to exist in the Counties of Los Angeles and Ventura due to fire and windstorm conditions that caused multiple fires. Executive Order No. N-7-25, signed by the Governor on January 14, 2025, prohibited a buyer from making an unsolicited offer to an owner of real property located in specified ZIP Codes in the County of Los Angeles to purchase the real property for an amount less than what the fair market value of the property was on January 6, 2025. Executive Order No. N-17-25 expanded that prohibition to include real properties in additional specified ZIP Codes. Subsequent executive orders extended the prohibition until July 1, 2025. Existing law makes a violation of the executive order a misdemeanor, as specified. Existing law, the Real Estate Law, provides for the licensure and regulation of real estate brokers and salespersons by the Real Estate Commissioner, the chief officer of the Department of Real Estate within the Business, Consumer Services, and Housing Agency. Existing law makes a willful violation of the Real Estate Law a crime. This bill would prohibit a person, as defined, from making an unsolicited offer to purchase residential real property in certain ZIP Codes in the County of Los Angeles covered by the above-described executive orders and other specified ZIP Codes in the Counties of Los Angeles and Ventura. The bill would define "unsolicited offer to purchase" for this purpose. The bill would require the buyer and seller, before the transfer of title in the purchase of residential real property subject to the above-described prohibition, to execute a written attestation affirming compliance with that prohibition, which, if signed, would create a presumption that the accepted offer was solicited by the seller, as specified. The bill would require the buyer to record the signed attestation as an attachment to the deed or other conveyance of title when recording the transfer of title, as specified. Because the bill would expand the crime of perjury, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. This bill would make a written offer in violation of these provisions by a licensed person under the Real Estate Law on their own behalf, or on behalf of another person while conducting licensed activity, a violation of the person's licensing law, unless SB 641 is enacted and becomes operative, in which case the offer would be a violation of a provision added by SB 641. The bill would authorize the Attorney General, a county counsel, city attorney, or a district attorney to bring a civil action to enforce these provisions. In addition to any other available remedies or penalties, the bill would grant a seller the right to cancel a purchase agreement entered into in violation of these provisions, as specified. The bill would subject a person who violates the above-described prohibition on making an unsolicited offer to purchase real property in those ZIP Codes to an assessment of a civil penalty, and would make the violation a misdemeanor, as specified. By creating new crimes, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. This bill would make these provisions severable, would make these provisions operative 30 days after the effective date of the bill, and would repeal these provisions on January 1, 2027. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the Counties of Los Angeles and Ventura. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.

Introduced
2025-03-19
Latest action
2025-10-10 — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 535, Statutes of 2025.
Bill type
bill
Last updated
—

Subjects

Sponsors

  • McKinnorauthor

Committees

Not provided by source.

Action timeline

  1. 2025-02-19

    Read first time. To print.

    reading-1

  2. 2025-02-20

    From printer. May be heard in committee March 22.

  3. 2025-03-03

    Referred to Com. on JUD.

    referral-committee

  4. 2025-03-19

    From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on JUD. Read second time and amended.

    amendment-introduction,amendment-passage,committee-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee

  5. 2025-03-20

    Re-referred to Com. on JUD.

    referral-committee

  6. 2025-03-26

    From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (March 25).

    amendment-introduction,amendment-passage,committee-passage,referral-committee

  7. 2025-03-27

    Read second time and amended.

    amendment-passage,reading-1,reading-2

  8. 2025-03-28

    Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

    referral-committee

  9. 2025-04-09

    In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.

    referral-committee

  10. 2025-05-23

    From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (May 23).

    committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable

  11. 2025-05-27

    Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

    reading-1,reading-2,reading-3

  12. 2025-06-02

    Read third time. Urgency clause adopted. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 67. Noes 6. Page 1858.).

    amendment-passage,passage,reading-1,reading-3

  13. 2025-06-03

    In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

    reading-1,referral-committee

  14. 2025-06-11

    Referred to Coms. on JUD. and PUB. S.

    referral-committee

  15. 2025-07-03

    From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. (Ayes 11. Noes 2.) (July 1).

    amendment-introduction,amendment-passage,committee-passage,referral-committee

  16. 2025-07-07

    Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.

    amendment-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee

  17. 2025-07-08

    From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 1.) (July 8). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

    committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable,referral-committee

  18. 2025-08-18

    In committee: Referred to suspense file.

    referral-committee

  19. 2025-08-29

    Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.

    amendment-passage,reading-1,reading-2

  20. 2025-08-29

    From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (August 29).

    amendment-introduction,amendment-passage,committee-passage

  21. 2025-09-02

    Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

    reading-1,reading-2,reading-3

  22. 2025-09-05

    Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.

    amendment-passage,reading-1,reading-2,reading-3

  23. 2025-09-08

    Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

    reading-1,reading-2,reading-3

  24. 2025-09-10

    Read third time. Urgency clause adopted. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 30. Noes 8. Page 2814.).

    amendment-passage,passage,reading-1,reading-3

  25. 2025-09-10

    In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.

  26. 2025-09-11

    Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 66. Noes 7. Page 3303.).

    amendment-passage,committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable

  27. 2025-09-23

    Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4 p.m.

    executive-receipt

  28. 2025-10-10

    Approved by the Governor.

    executive-signature

  29. 2025-10-10

    Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 535, Statutes of 2025.

    became-law

Versions

  • 02/19/25 - Introduced — 2025-02-19Compare
  • 03/19/25 - Amended Assembly — 2025-03-19Compare
  • 03/27/25 - Amended Assembly — 2025-03-27Compare
  • 07/07/25 - Amended Senate — 2025-07-07Compare
  • 08/29/25 - Amended Senate — 2025-08-29Compare
  • 09/05/25 - Amended Senate — 2025-09-05Compare
  • 09/15/25 - Enrolled — 2025-09-15Compare
  • 10/10/25 - Chaptered — 2025-10-10Compare
  • AB851Compare
  • (document, no version)Compare

Documents

Votes

  • Do pass as amended and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]

    2025-03-25 · pass · 12-0

    Member-level votes (12)
    • Zbur: yes
    • Dixon: yes
    • Harabedian: yes
    • Kalra: yes
    • Stefani: yes
    • Essayli: yes
    • Bauer-Kahan: yes
    • Pacheco: yes
    • Connolly: yes
    • Sanchez: yes
    • Papan: yes
    • Bryan: yes

  • Do pass.

    2025-05-23 · pass · 12-0

    Member-level votes (15)
    • Calderon: yes
    • Elhawary: yes
    • Dixon: yes
    • Hart: yes
    • Mark González: yes
    • Arambula: yes
    • Pacheco: yes
    • Solache: yes
    • Caloza: yes
    • Wicks: yes
    • Pellerin: yes
    • Fong: yes
    • Ta: other
    • Sanchez: other
    • Tangipa: other

  • AB 851 McKinnor Third Reading Urgency

    2025-06-02 · pass · 67-6

    Member-level votes (79)
    • Hoover: yes
    • Zbur: yes
    • Flora: yes
    • Bennett: yes
    • Ortega: yes
    • Bains: yes
    • Valencia: yes
    • Gallagher: no
    • Chen: no
    • Tangipa: no
    • DeMaio: no
    • Patterson: no
    • Sanchez: no
    • Lackey: other
    • Ta: other
    • Ellis: other
    • Hadwick: other
    • Macedo: other
    • Castillo: other
    • Addis: yes
    • Garcia: yes
    • Lee: yes
    • Rivas: yes
    • Petrie-Norris: yes
    • Bryan: yes
    • Michelle Rodriguez: yes
    • Rogers: yes
    • Wicks: yes
    • Irwin: yes
    • Arambula: yes
    • Caloza: yes
    • Ahrens: yes
    • Krell: yes
    • Stefani: yes
    • Harabedian: yes
    • Mark González: yes
    • Calderon: yes
    • Nguyen: yes
    • Ward: yes
    • Carrillo: yes
    • Blanca Rubio: yes
    • Muratsuchi: yes
    • Patel: yes
    • Solache: yes
    • McKinnor: yes
    • Bonta: yes
    • Lowenthal: yes
    • Papan: yes
    • Jeff Gonzalez: yes
    • Schiavo: yes
    • Gabriel: yes
    • Dixon: yes
    • Pacheco: yes
    • Ávila Farías: yes
    • Aguiar-Curry: yes
    • Ransom: yes
    • Connolly: yes
    • Celeste Rodriguez: yes
    • Fong: yes
    • Quirk-Silva: yes
    • Ramos: yes
    • Soria: yes
    • Wallis: yes
    • Pellerin: yes
    • Elhawary: yes
    • Davies: yes
    • Kalra: yes
    • Alanis: yes
    • Haney: yes
    • Gipson: yes
    • Hart: yes
    • Boerner: yes
    • Alvarez: yes
    • Bauer-Kahan: yes
    • Schultz: yes
    • Sharp-Collins: yes
    • Berman: yes
    • Jackson: yes
    • Wilson: yes

  • Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to the Committee on [Public Safety]

    2025-07-01 · pass · 11-2

    Member-level votes (13)
    • Durazo: yes
    • Wahab: yes
    • Arreguín: yes
    • Umberg: yes
    • Stern: yes
    • Weber Pierson: yes
    • Caballero: yes
    • Wiener: yes
    • Laird: yes
    • Allen: yes
    • Ashby: yes
    • Valladares: no
    • Niello: no

  • Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]

    2025-07-08 · pass · 5-1

    Member-level votes (6)
    • Arreguín: yes
    • Pérez: yes
    • Gonzalez: yes
    • Caballero: yes
    • Wiener: yes
    • Seyarto: no

  • Placed on suspense file

    2025-08-18 · pass · 7-0

    Member-level votes (7)
    • Richardson: yes
    • Seyarto: yes
    • Caballero: yes
    • Cabaldon: yes
    • Dahle: yes
    • Wahab: yes
    • Grayson: yes

  • Do pass as amended

    2025-08-29 · pass · 5-2

    Member-level votes (7)
    • Richardson: yes
    • Grayson: yes
    • Wahab: yes
    • Caballero: yes
    • Cabaldon: yes
    • Dahle: no
    • Seyarto: no

  • 3rd Reading AB851 McKinnor By Pérez Urgency Clause

    2025-09-10 · pass · 30-8

    Member-level votes (40)
    • Umberg: yes
    • Wiener: yes
    • Wahab: yes
    • Cortese: yes
    • Limón: yes
    • Durazo: yes
    • Archuleta: yes
    • Gonzalez: yes
    • Smallwood-Cuevas: yes
    • Grayson: yes
    • Weber Pierson: yes
    • Hurtado: yes
    • Arreguín: yes
    • Laird: yes
    • Cervantes: yes
    • Rubio: yes
    • McGuire: yes
    • Reyes: yes
    • Blakespear: yes
    • Padilla: yes
    • Menjivar: yes
    • Pérez: yes
    • Stern: yes
    • Allen: yes
    • Caballero: yes
    • McNerney: yes
    • Ashby: yes
    • Richardson: yes
    • Becker: yes
    • Cabaldon: yes
    • Choi: no
    • Strickland: no
    • Niello: no
    • Jones: no
    • Ochoa Bogh: no
    • Alvarado-Gil: no
    • Seyarto: no
    • Valladares: no
    • Dahle: other
    • Grove: other

  • AB 851 McKinnor Concurrence in Senate Amendments

    2025-09-11 · pass · 66-7

    Member-level votes (80)
    • Ahrens: yes
    • Mark González: yes
    • Dixon: yes
    • Quirk-Silva: yes
    • Gipson: yes
    • Rogers: yes
    • Addis: yes
    • Ward: yes
    • Haney: yes
    • Hart: yes
    • Fong: yes
    • Calderon: yes
    • Elhawary: yes
    • Wilson: yes
    • Carrillo: yes
    • Bains: yes
    • Ransom: yes
    • Soria: yes
    • Michelle Rodriguez: yes
    • Berman: yes
    • Valencia: yes
    • Wicks: yes
    • Celeste Rodriguez: yes
    • Arambula: yes
    • Connolly: yes
    • Schultz: yes
    • Bauer-Kahan: yes
    • Bennett: yes
    • Papan: yes
    • Schiavo: yes
    • Bonta: yes
    • Ávila Farías: yes
    • Aguiar-Curry: yes
    • Jeff Gonzalez: yes
    • Pacheco: yes
    • Boerner: yes
    • Alvarez: yes
    • Lee: yes
    • Alanis: yes
    • Wallis: yes
    • Stefani: yes
    • Caloza: yes
    • Hoover: yes
    • Sharp-Collins: yes
    • Nguyen: yes
    • Ortega: yes
    • Solache: yes
    • Lowenthal: yes
    • Blanca Rubio: yes
    • Jackson: yes
    • Bryan: yes
    • Petrie-Norris: yes
    • Harabedian: yes
    • Gabriel: yes
    • Zbur: yes
    • Davies: yes
    • McKinnor: yes
    • Pellerin: yes
    • Muratsuchi: yes
    • Krell: yes
    • Irwin: yes
    • Ramos: yes
    • Patel: yes
    • Kalra: yes
    • Rivas: yes
    • Garcia: yes
    • Johnson: no
    • Tangipa: no
    • Gallagher: no
    • Sanchez: no
    • Macedo: no
    • Patterson: no
    • DeMaio: no
    • Hadwick: other
    • Lackey: other
    • Chen: other
    • Castillo: other
    • Ellis: other
    • Flora: other
    • Ta: other

Related bills

No related bills recorded for this bill.

Official source

http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260AB851

Attribution

Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T01:34:27.960412Z

Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:

Source and document changesStatus and relationship changes

Use this data

Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=CA&identifier=AB 851. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.

Known limitations

  • Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
  • Committee referrals are not yet captured.
  • Some documents have no extracted text yet, so version comparison may be limited.

See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.