Bill Commons

CA AB 843

vetoed

Health care coverage: language access.

California · 2025-2026 Regular Session · lower

Quick answers

Did CA AB 843 pass?

No. CA AB 843 passed the legislature but was vetoed on 2026-01-22. Latest recorded action (2026-01-22): Consideration of Governor's veto stricken from file.

What is CA AB 843 about?

(1) Existing law, the Knox-Keene Health Care Service Plan Act of 1975, provides for the licensure and regulation of health care service plans by the Department of Managed Health Care and makes a willful violation of the act a crime. Existing law provides for the regulation of health insurers by the Department of Insurance, which is under the control of the Insurance Commissioner. Existing law requires the Department of Managed Health Care and the commissioner to develop and adopt regulations establishing standards and requirements to provide enrollees and insureds with appropriate access to language assistance in obtaining health care services and covered benefits. Existing law requires the Department of Managed Health Care and commissioner, in developing the regulations, to require health care service plans and health insurers to assess the linguistic needs of the enrollee and insured population, and to provide for translation and interpretation for medical services, as indicated. This bill would require a health care service plan or health insurer to take reasonable steps to provide meaningful access to each individual with limited English proficiency, including companions with limited English proficiency, eligible to receive services or likely to be directly affected by its programs and activities. The bill would require a health care service plan or health insurer to offer a qualified interpreter or to utilize a qualified translator when interpretation or translation services are required, as specified. The bill would prohibit a health care service plan or health insurer from requiring an individual with limited English proficiency to provide or pay for the costs of their own interpreter. The bill would require a health care service plan or health insurer to comply with specified requirements when providing remote interpreting services. The bill would make a health care service plan or health insurer that violates these provisions liable for administrative penalties, as specified. (2) Existing law requires certain vital documents containing enrollee- or insured-specific information to include a written notice of the availability of interpretation services in certain threshold languages. Existing law requires a health care service plan or health insurer, upon request, to provide a written translation of those documents within a specified timeframe. For those documents that also relate to expedited plan review of a grievance for a case involving an imminent and serious threat to the health of the patient, existing law authorizes a health care service plan or health insurer to satisfy the requirement by providing notice of the availability of oral interpretation services. This bill would authorize a health care service plan or health insurer to satisfy the notice requirement by taking reasonable steps to inform the enrollee or insured of any required actions, including by providing a sight translation of a document. (3) Existing law requires a health care service plan or health insurer that advertises or markets products in a non-English language, as specified, to provide specified documents in the same non-English language. This bill would add to the list of documents required to be provided in the advertised or marketed non-English language, (A) notices related to any termination of coverage and change in covered services, (B) complaint forms to file a grievance or appeal, and (C) communications related to costs and payment of covered services, as specified. (4) Existing law requires a health care service plan or health insurer to notify enrollees or insureds, as applicable, and members of the public of nondiscrimination policies, grievance or complaint procedures, as applicable, and the availability of language assistance services and appropriate auxiliary aids and services, as specified. This bill would require a health care service plan or health insurer to also provide the information to persons seeking coverage. The bill would require a health care service plan or health insurer to notify enrollees or insureds, persons seeking coverage, and members of the public that the plan or insurer provides language assistance services and appropriate auxiliary aids and services, as specified. Existing law requires this information to be provided upon initial enrollment, upon renewal, and annually in or with materials that are routinely disseminated. This bill would require a health care service plan or health insurer to also provide the above-described information in clear and prominent physical locations, as specified, and upon request. The bill would require a health care service plan or health insurer to provide information regarding the provision of language assistance services, as described above, in a notice when specified forms or communications are provided, as specified. (5) Existing law requires a health care service plan or health insurer to report to the applicable department on internal policies and procedures relating to cultural appropriateness in specified contexts. This bill would require a health care service plan or health insurer to additionally report to the applicable department on internal policies and procedures relating to language access, as specified. (6) Because a willful violation of these provisions by a health care service plan would be a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Who sponsors CA AB 843?

Garcia is the primary sponsor of CA AB 843.

Description

(1) Existing law, the Knox-Keene Health Care Service Plan Act of 1975, provides for the licensure and regulation of health care service plans by the Department of Managed Health Care and makes a willful violation of the act a crime. Existing law provides for the regulation of health insurers by the Department of Insurance, which is under the control of the Insurance Commissioner. Existing law requires the Department of Managed Health Care and the commissioner to develop and adopt regulations establishing standards and requirements to provide enrollees and insureds with appropriate access to language assistance in obtaining health care services and covered benefits. Existing law requires the Department of Managed Health Care and commissioner, in developing the regulations, to require health care service plans and health insurers to assess the linguistic needs of the enrollee and insured population, and to provide for translation and interpretation for medical services, as indicated. This bill would require a health care service plan or health insurer to take reasonable steps to provide meaningful access to each individual with limited English proficiency, including companions with limited English proficiency, eligible to receive services or likely to be directly affected by its programs and activities. The bill would require a health care service plan or health insurer to offer a qualified interpreter or to utilize a qualified translator when interpretation or translation services are required, as specified. The bill would prohibit a health care service plan or health insurer from requiring an individual with limited English proficiency to provide or pay for the costs of their own interpreter. The bill would require a health care service plan or health insurer to comply with specified requirements when providing remote interpreting services. The bill would make a health care service plan or health insurer that violates these provisions liable for administrative penalties, as specified. (2) Existing law requires certain vital documents containing enrollee- or insured-specific information to include a written notice of the availability of interpretation services in certain threshold languages. Existing law requires a health care service plan or health insurer, upon request, to provide a written translation of those documents within a specified timeframe. For those documents that also relate to expedited plan review of a grievance for a case involving an imminent and serious threat to the health of the patient, existing law authorizes a health care service plan or health insurer to satisfy the requirement by providing notice of the availability of oral interpretation services. This bill would authorize a health care service plan or health insurer to satisfy the notice requirement by taking reasonable steps to inform the enrollee or insured of any required actions, including by providing a sight translation of a document. (3) Existing law requires a health care service plan or health insurer that advertises or markets products in a non-English language, as specified, to provide specified documents in the same non-English language. This bill would add to the list of documents required to be provided in the advertised or marketed non-English language, (A) notices related to any termination of coverage and change in covered services, (B) complaint forms to file a grievance or appeal, and (C) communications related to costs and payment of covered services, as specified. (4) Existing law requires a health care service plan or health insurer to notify enrollees or insureds, as applicable, and members of the public of nondiscrimination policies, grievance or complaint procedures, as applicable, and the availability of language assistance services and appropriate auxiliary aids and services, as specified. This bill would require a health care service plan or health insurer to also provide the information to persons seeking coverage. The bill would require a health care service plan or health insurer to notify enrollees or insureds, persons seeking coverage, and members of the public that the plan or insurer provides language assistance services and appropriate auxiliary aids and services, as specified. Existing law requires this information to be provided upon initial enrollment, upon renewal, and annually in or with materials that are routinely disseminated. This bill would require a health care service plan or health insurer to also provide the above-described information in clear and prominent physical locations, as specified, and upon request. The bill would require a health care service plan or health insurer to provide information regarding the provision of language assistance services, as described above, in a notice when specified forms or communications are provided, as specified. (5) Existing law requires a health care service plan or health insurer to report to the applicable department on internal policies and procedures relating to cultural appropriateness in specified contexts. This bill would require a health care service plan or health insurer to additionally report to the applicable department on internal policies and procedures relating to language access, as specified. (6) Because a willful violation of these provisions by a health care service plan would be a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Introduced
2025-07-03
Latest action
2026-01-22 — Consideration of Governor's veto stricken from file.
Bill type
bill
Last updated

Subjects

Sponsors

  • Garciaauthor

Committees

Not provided by source.

Action timeline

  1. 2025-02-19

    Read first time. To print.

    reading-1

  2. 2025-02-20

    From printer. May be heard in committee March 22.

  3. 2025-03-03

    Referred to Com. on HEALTH.

    referral-committee

  4. 2025-03-26

    From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 13. Noes 0.) (March 25). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

    committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable,referral-committee

  5. 2025-04-09

    In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.

  6. 2025-04-23

    In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to suspense file.

    referral-committee

  7. 2025-05-23

    From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (May 23).

    committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable

  8. 2025-05-27

    Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

    reading-1,reading-2,reading-3

  9. 2025-06-02

    Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 66. Noes 1. Page 1857.)

    passage,reading-1,reading-3

  10. 2025-06-03

    In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

    reading-1,referral-committee

  11. 2025-06-11

    Referred to Coms. on HEALTH and JUD.

    referral-committee

  12. 2025-07-03

    From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (July 2).

    amendment-introduction,amendment-passage,committee-passage,referral-committee

  13. 2025-07-07

    Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.

    amendment-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee

  14. 2025-07-08

    Withdrawn from committee.

    withdrawal

  15. 2025-07-08

    Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

    referral-committee

  16. 2025-08-18

    In committee: Referred to suspense file.

    referral-committee

  17. 2025-08-29

    From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (August 29).

    committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable

  18. 2025-08-29

    Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

    reading-1,reading-2,reading-3

  19. 2025-09-05

    Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.

    amendment-passage,reading-1,reading-2,reading-3

  20. 2025-09-08

    Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

    reading-1,reading-2,reading-3

  21. 2025-09-09

    Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 34. Noes 1. Page 2656.).

    passage,reading-1,reading-3

  22. 2025-09-09

    In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.

  23. 2025-09-10

    Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 66. Noes 1. Page 3228.).

    amendment-passage,committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable

  24. 2025-09-22

    Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3 p.m.

    executive-receipt

  25. 2025-10-01

    Vetoed by Governor.

    executive-veto

  26. 2025-10-01

    Consideration of Governor's veto pending.

  27. 2026-01-22

    Consideration of Governor's veto stricken from file.

    veto-override-failure

Versions

  • 02/19/25 - Introduced — 2025-02-19Compare
  • 07/07/25 - Amended Senate — 2025-07-07Compare
  • 09/05/25 - Amended Senate — 2025-09-05Compare
  • 09/12/25 - Enrolled — 2025-09-12Compare
  • AB843Compare
  • (document, no version)Compare

Documents

Votes

  • Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]

    2025-03-25 · pass · 13-0

    Member-level votes (15)
    • Arambula: yes
    • Stefani: yes
    • Mark González: yes
    • Krell: yes
    • Aguiar-Curry: yes
    • Bonta: yes
    • Sharp-Collins: yes
    • Schiavo: yes
    • Patel: yes
    • Celeste Rodriguez: yes
    • Flora: yes
    • Addis: yes
    • Carrillo: yes
    • Chen: other
    • Sanchez: other
  • Do pass.

    2025-05-23 · pass · 12-0

    Member-level votes (15)
    • Calderon: yes
    • Elhawary: yes
    • Hart: yes
    • Mark González: yes
    • Arambula: yes
    • Pacheco: yes
    • Solache: yes
    • Ta: yes
    • Caloza: yes
    • Wicks: yes
    • Pellerin: yes
    • Fong: yes
    • Sanchez: other
    • Dixon: other
    • Tangipa: other
  • AB 843 Garcia Assembly Third Reading

    2025-06-02 · pass · 66-1

    Member-level votes (79)
    • Addis: yes
    • Garcia: yes
    • Lee: yes
    • Rivas: yes
    • Petrie-Norris: yes
    • Bryan: yes
    • Michelle Rodriguez: yes
    • Rogers: yes
    • Wicks: yes
    • Irwin: yes
    • Arambula: yes
    • Caloza: yes
    • Ahrens: yes
    • Krell: yes
    • Stefani: yes
    • Harabedian: yes
    • Mark González: yes
    • Calderon: yes
    • Nguyen: yes
    • Ward: yes
    • Carrillo: yes
    • Blanca Rubio: yes
    • Muratsuchi: yes
    • Patel: yes
    • Solache: yes
    • McKinnor: yes
    • Bonta: yes
    • Lowenthal: yes
    • Papan: yes
    • Jeff Gonzalez: yes
    • Schiavo: yes
    • Gabriel: yes
    • Pacheco: yes
    • Ávila Farías: yes
    • Aguiar-Curry: yes
    • Ransom: yes
    • Connolly: yes
    • Celeste Rodriguez: yes
    • Fong: yes
    • Quirk-Silva: yes
    • Ramos: yes
    • Soria: yes
    • Wallis: yes
    • Pellerin: yes
    • Elhawary: yes
    • Davies: yes
    • Kalra: yes
    • Alanis: yes
    • Haney: yes
    • Gipson: yes
    • Hart: yes
    • Boerner: yes
    • Alvarez: yes
    • Bauer-Kahan: yes
    • Schultz: yes
    • Sharp-Collins: yes
    • Berman: yes
    • Jackson: yes
    • Wilson: yes
    • Ta: yes
    • Zbur: yes
    • Flora: yes
    • Bennett: yes
    • Ortega: yes
    • Bains: yes
    • Valencia: yes
    • DeMaio: no
    • Hoover: other
    • Gallagher: other
    • Chen: other
    • Lackey: other
    • Tangipa: other
    • Ellis: other
    • Hadwick: other
    • Macedo: other
    • Castillo: other
    • Dixon: other
    • Patterson: other
    • Sanchez: other
  • Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to the Committee on [Judiciary]

    2025-07-02 · pass · 11-0

    Member-level votes (11)
    • Gonzalez: yes
    • Durazo: yes
    • Valladares: yes
    • Grove: yes
    • Limón: yes
    • Weber Pierson: yes
    • Rubio: yes
    • Richardson: yes
    • Wiener: yes
    • Padilla: yes
    • Menjivar: yes
  • Placed on suspense file

    2025-08-18 · pass · 7-0

    Member-level votes (7)
    • Richardson: yes
    • Seyarto: yes
    • Caballero: yes
    • Cabaldon: yes
    • Dahle: yes
    • Wahab: yes
    • Grayson: yes
  • Do pass

    2025-08-29 · pass · 5-0

    Member-level votes (7)
    • Richardson: yes
    • Grayson: yes
    • Wahab: yes
    • Caballero: yes
    • Cabaldon: yes
    • Dahle: other
    • Seyarto: other
  • 3rd Reading AB843 Garcia By Menjivar

    2025-09-09 · pass · 34-1

    Member-level votes (40)
    • Richardson: yes
    • Menjivar: yes
    • Cortese: yes
    • Weber Pierson: yes
    • McNerney: yes
    • Stern: yes
    • Smallwood-Cuevas: yes
    • Becker: yes
    • Valladares: yes
    • McGuire: yes
    • Cervantes: yes
    • Hurtado: yes
    • Cabaldon: yes
    • Rubio: yes
    • Durazo: yes
    • Laird: yes
    • Padilla: yes
    • Limón: yes
    • Strickland: yes
    • Pérez: yes
    • Reyes: yes
    • Archuleta: yes
    • Niello: yes
    • Wiener: yes
    • Ashby: yes
    • Arreguín: yes
    • Grayson: yes
    • Allen: yes
    • Gonzalez: yes
    • Caballero: yes
    • Choi: yes
    • Wahab: yes
    • Umberg: yes
    • Blakespear: yes
    • Alvarado-Gil: no
    • Ochoa Bogh: other
    • Dahle: other
    • Grove: other
    • Jones: other
    • Seyarto: other
  • AB 843 Garcia Concurrence in Senate Amendments

    2025-09-11 · pass · 66-1

    Member-level votes (80)
    • Ahrens: yes
    • Mark González: yes
    • Quirk-Silva: yes
    • Gipson: yes
    • Rogers: yes
    • Addis: yes
    • Ward: yes
    • Haney: yes
    • Hart: yes
    • Fong: yes
    • Calderon: yes
    • Elhawary: yes
    • Wilson: yes
    • Carrillo: yes
    • Bains: yes
    • Ransom: yes
    • Soria: yes
    • Michelle Rodriguez: yes
    • Berman: yes
    • Valencia: yes
    • Wicks: yes
    • Celeste Rodriguez: yes
    • Arambula: yes
    • Connolly: yes
    • Schultz: yes
    • Bauer-Kahan: yes
    • Bennett: yes
    • Papan: yes
    • Schiavo: yes
    • Bonta: yes
    • Ávila Farías: yes
    • Aguiar-Curry: yes
    • Jeff Gonzalez: yes
    • Pacheco: yes
    • Boerner: yes
    • Alvarez: yes
    • Lee: yes
    • Alanis: yes
    • Wallis: yes
    • Patterson: yes
    • Stefani: yes
    • Ta: yes
    • Caloza: yes
    • Sharp-Collins: yes
    • Nguyen: yes
    • Ortega: yes
    • Solache: yes
    • Lowenthal: yes
    • Blanca Rubio: yes
    • Jackson: yes
    • Bryan: yes
    • Petrie-Norris: yes
    • Harabedian: yes
    • Gabriel: yes
    • Zbur: yes
    • Davies: yes
    • McKinnor: yes
    • Pellerin: yes
    • Muratsuchi: yes
    • Krell: yes
    • Irwin: yes
    • Ramos: yes
    • Patel: yes
    • Kalra: yes
    • Rivas: yes
    • Garcia: yes
    • DeMaio: no
    • Johnson: other
    • Dixon: other
    • Hoover: other
    • Hadwick: other
    • Tangipa: other
    • Lackey: other
    • Macedo: other
    • Gallagher: other
    • Sanchez: other
    • Chen: other
    • Castillo: other
    • Ellis: other
    • Flora: other

Related bills

No related bills recorded for this bill.

Official source

Attribution

Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T01:34:27.960412Z

Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:

Use this data

Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=CA&identifier=AB 843. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.

Known limitations

  • Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
  • Committee referrals are not yet captured.
  • Some documents have no extracted text yet, so version comparison may be limited.

See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.