CA AB 684
deadUniversity of California: meetings of the Regents.
California · 2025-2026 Regular Session · lower
Quick answers
Did CA AB 684 pass?
No. CA AB 684 did not pass — it was defeated or died in the legislative process (2026-02-02). Latest recorded action (2026-02-02): From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
What is CA AB 684 about?
Existing law establishes the University of California, under the administration of the Regents of the University of California, as one of the segments of public postsecondary education in the state. Existing law requires all meetings of the regents, defined to include the Board of Regents, the standing and special committees or subcommittees of the board, and an advisory board, advisory commission, advisory committee, advisory subcommittee, study group, task force, or similar multimember advisory body of the board that has continuing subject matter jurisdiction in the area of compensation, to be subject to the Bagley-Keene Open Meeting Act, except as provided. This bill would define, for purposes of being subject to the Bagley-Keene Open Meeting Act, the "Regents of the University of California" to also include the Academic Senate of the University of California, Board of Admissions and Relations with Schools.
Who sponsors CA AB 684?
Patel is the primary sponsor of CA AB 684.
Description
Existing law establishes the University of California, under the administration of the Regents of the University of California, as one of the segments of public postsecondary education in the state. Existing law requires all meetings of the regents, defined to include the Board of Regents, the standing and special committees or subcommittees of the board, and an advisory board, advisory commission, advisory committee, advisory subcommittee, study group, task force, or similar multimember advisory body of the board that has continuing subject matter jurisdiction in the area of compensation, to be subject to the Bagley-Keene Open Meeting Act, except as provided. This bill would define, for purposes of being subject to the Bagley-Keene Open Meeting Act, the "Regents of the University of California" to also include the Academic Senate of the University of California, Board of Admissions and Relations with Schools.
- Introduced
- —
- Latest action
- 2026-02-02 — From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
- Bill type
- bill
- Last updated
- —
Subjects
Sponsors
- Patelauthor
Committees
Not provided by source.
Action timeline
2025-02-14
Read first time. To print.
reading-1
2025-02-15
From printer. May be heard in committee March 17.
2025-03-10
Referred to Coms. on HIGHER ED. and G.O.
referral-committee
2025-04-09
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on G.O. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (April 8). Re-referred to Com. on G.O.
committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable,referral-committee
2025-04-24
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 22. Noes 0.) (April 23). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable,referral-committee
2025-05-07
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
referral-committee
2025-05-23
In committee: Held under submission.
2026-01-31
Died pursuant to Art. IV, Sec. 10(c) of the Constitution.
failure
2026-02-02
From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
committee-passage,failure
Versions
Documents
- application/pdf
- text/html
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
Votes
Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Governmental Organization]
2025-04-08 · pass · 10-0
Member-level votes (10)
- DeMaio: yes
- Sharp-Collins: yes
- Jackson: yes
- Tangipa: yes
- Jeff Gonzalez: yes
- Boerner: yes
- Fong: yes
- Muratsuchi: yes
- Celeste Rodriguez: yes
- Patel: yes
Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]
2025-04-23 · pass · 22-0
Member-level votes (22)
- Ramos: yes
- Davies: yes
- Pacheco: yes
- Blanca Rubio: yes
- Bryan: yes
- Berman: yes
- Valencia: yes
- Solache: yes
- Michelle Rodriguez: yes
- Wallis: yes
- Alvarez: yes
- McKinnor: yes
- Fong: yes
- Dixon: yes
- Ta: yes
- Gabriel: yes
- Gipson: yes
- Soria: yes
- Carrillo: yes
- Macedo: yes
- Nguyen: yes
- Sanchez: yes
Related bills
No related bills recorded for this bill.
Official source
Attribution
Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T01:34:27.960412Z
Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:
Use this data
Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=CA&identifier=AB 684. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.
Known limitations
- Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
- Committee referrals are not yet captured.
- Some documents have no extracted text yet, so version comparison may be limited.
See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.