CA AB 682
vetoedHealth care coverage reporting.
California · 2025-2026 Regular Session · lower
Quick answers
Did CA AB 682 pass?
No. CA AB 682 passed the legislature but was vetoed on 2026-01-22. Latest recorded action (2026-01-22): Consideration of Governor's veto stricken from file.
What is CA AB 682 about?
Existing law, the Knox-Keene Health Care Service Plan Act of 1975, provides for the licensure and regulation of health care service plans by the Department of Managed Health Care and makes a willful violation of the act a crime. Existing law provides for the regulation of health insurers by the Department of Insurance. Existing law generally authorizes a health care service plan or health insurer to use prior authorization and other utilization review or utilization management functions, under which a licensed physician or a licensed health care professional who is competent to evaluate specific clinical issues may approve, modify, delay, or deny requests for health care services based on medical necessity. Existing law requires a health care service plan or health insurer to file various reports with the relevant regulating department. This bill would require a health care service plan or health insurer that imposes prior authorization to report specified prior authorization data from the previous calendar year on its internet website on or before February 1, 2026, for health care service plans, on or before February 1, 2028, for health insurers, and annually on or before February 1 thereafter. The bill would require a health care service plan or health insurer to annually report specified claims and prior authorization data to the relevant department by February 1 of each year, beginning February 1, 2027, for health care service plans and February 1, 2028, for health insurers. The bill would require the departments to post this information, disaggregated by plan or insurer, on their internet websites by April 15 of each year, beginning April 15, 2027, for health care service plans and April 15, 2028, for health insurers. The bill would authorize the Director of the Department of Managed Health Care and the Insurance Commissioner to reject a report required pursuant to these provisions, and would authorize the commissioner to assess an administrative penalty against a health insurer for a failure to correct a deficiency in the report. The bill would authorize the director and commissioner to make rules and regulations specifying the form and content of the reports posted online and submitted to the relevant department, as specified. Because a willful violation of these provisions by a health care service plan would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Who sponsors CA AB 682?
Ortega is the primary sponsor of CA AB 682, joined by 1 cosponsor.
Description
Existing law, the Knox-Keene Health Care Service Plan Act of 1975, provides for the licensure and regulation of health care service plans by the Department of Managed Health Care and makes a willful violation of the act a crime. Existing law provides for the regulation of health insurers by the Department of Insurance. Existing law generally authorizes a health care service plan or health insurer to use prior authorization and other utilization review or utilization management functions, under which a licensed physician or a licensed health care professional who is competent to evaluate specific clinical issues may approve, modify, delay, or deny requests for health care services based on medical necessity. Existing law requires a health care service plan or health insurer to file various reports with the relevant regulating department. This bill would require a health care service plan or health insurer that imposes prior authorization to report specified prior authorization data from the previous calendar year on its internet website on or before February 1, 2026, for health care service plans, on or before February 1, 2028, for health insurers, and annually on or before February 1 thereafter. The bill would require a health care service plan or health insurer to annually report specified claims and prior authorization data to the relevant department by February 1 of each year, beginning February 1, 2027, for health care service plans and February 1, 2028, for health insurers. The bill would require the departments to post this information, disaggregated by plan or insurer, on their internet websites by April 15 of each year, beginning April 15, 2027, for health care service plans and April 15, 2028, for health insurers. The bill would authorize the Director of the Department of Managed Health Care and the Insurance Commissioner to reject a report required pursuant to these provisions, and would authorize the commissioner to assess an administrative penalty against a health insurer for a failure to correct a deficiency in the report. The bill would authorize the director and commissioner to make rules and regulations specifying the form and content of the reports posted online and submitted to the relevant department, as specified. Because a willful violation of these provisions by a health care service plan would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
- Introduced
- 2025-06-23
- Latest action
- 2026-01-22 — Consideration of Governor's veto stricken from file.
- Bill type
- bill
- Last updated
- —
Subjects
Sponsors
- Ortegaauthor
- Kalraprincipal coauthor
Committees
Not provided by source.
Action timeline
2025-02-14
Read first time. To print.
reading-1
2025-02-15
From printer. May be heard in committee March 17.
2025-03-03
Referred to Com. on HEALTH.
referral-committee
2025-04-30
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (April 29). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable,referral-committee
2025-05-14
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
2025-05-21
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (May 21).
committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable
2025-05-22
Read second time. Ordered to Consent Calendar.
reading-1,reading-2
2025-05-27
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 76. Noes 0. Page 1739.)
passage,reading-1,reading-3
2025-05-28
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
reading-1,referral-committee
2025-06-04
Referred to Com. on HEALTH.
referral-committee
2025-06-23
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
amendment-introduction,amendment-passage,committee-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee
2025-07-17
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
amendment-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee
2025-07-17
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (July 16).
amendment-introduction,amendment-passage,committee-passage,referral-committee
2025-08-18
In committee: Referred to suspense file.
referral-committee
2025-08-29
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (August 29).
committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable
2025-08-29
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
reading-1,reading-2,reading-3
2025-09-04
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
amendment-passage,reading-1,reading-2,reading-3
2025-09-08
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
reading-1,reading-2,reading-3
2025-09-09
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 31. Noes 3. Page 2665.).
passage,reading-1,reading-3
2025-09-09
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
2025-09-10
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 66. Noes 3. Page 3225.).
amendment-passage,committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable
2025-09-22
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3 p.m.
executive-receipt
2025-10-06
Vetoed by Governor.
executive-veto
2025-10-06
Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
2026-01-22
Consideration of Governor's veto stricken from file.
veto-override-failure
Versions
Documents
- application/pdf
- application/pdf
- application/pdf
- application/pdf
- application/pdf
- text/html
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
Votes
Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations] with recommendation: To Consent Calendar
2025-04-29 · pass · 16-0
Member-level votes (16)
- Arambula: yes
- Patel: yes
- Addis: yes
- Chen: yes
- Flora: yes
- Celeste Rodriguez: yes
- Mark González: yes
- Patterson: yes
- Sharp-Collins: yes
- Schiavo: yes
- Bonta: yes
- Aguiar-Curry: yes
- Stefani: yes
- Carrillo: yes
- Krell: yes
- Sanchez: yes
Do pass. To Consent Calendar.
2025-05-21 · pass · 15-0
Member-level votes (15)
- Pellerin: yes
- Ta: yes
- Fong: yes
- Calderon: yes
- Pacheco: yes
- Elhawary: yes
- Tangipa: yes
- Sanchez: yes
- Mark González: yes
- Wicks: yes
- Arambula: yes
- Dixon: yes
- Caloza: yes
- Solache: yes
- Hart: yes
AB 682 Ortega Consent Calendar Second Day
2025-05-27 · pass · 76-0
Member-level votes (79)
- Alanis: yes
- Carrillo: yes
- Bonta: yes
- Mark González: yes
- Sanchez: yes
- Michelle Rodriguez: yes
- Berman: yes
- Pellerin: yes
- Lackey: yes
- Valencia: yes
- Pacheco: yes
- Aguiar-Curry: yes
- Muratsuchi: yes
- Schultz: yes
- Petrie-Norris: yes
- Ellis: yes
- Solache: yes
- Calderon: yes
- Fong: yes
- Krell: yes
- Davies: yes
- Irwin: yes
- Macedo: yes
- Connolly: yes
- Lee: yes
- Hadwick: yes
- Rogers: yes
- Chen: yes
- Kalra: yes
- Ahrens: yes
- Schiavo: yes
- Celeste Rodriguez: yes
- Gallagher: yes
- Gipson: yes
- Haney: yes
- Sharp-Collins: yes
- Caloza: yes
- Ramos: yes
- Ransom: yes
- Hoover: yes
- Patterson: yes
- Harabedian: yes
- DeMaio: yes
- Bauer-Kahan: yes
- Flora: yes
- Patel: yes
- Quirk-Silva: yes
- Wilson: yes
- Lowenthal: yes
- Papan: yes
- Dixon: yes
- Tangipa: yes
- Wicks: yes
- Ta: yes
- Bryan: yes
- Alvarez: yes
- Elhawary: yes
- Hart: yes
- Jackson: yes
- Zbur: yes
- Ward: yes
- Ortega: yes
- Wallis: yes
- Castillo: yes
- Stefani: yes
- Blanca Rubio: yes
- Ávila Farías: yes
- Boerner: yes
- Gabriel: yes
- Garcia: yes
- McKinnor: yes
- Soria: yes
- Bains: yes
- Addis: yes
- Rivas: yes
- Arambula: yes
- Bennett: other
- Nguyen: other
- Jeff Gonzalez: other
Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to the Committee on [Appropriations]
2025-07-16 · pass · 9-0
Member-level votes (11)
- Weber Pierson: yes
- Limón: yes
- Padilla: yes
- Rubio: yes
- Gonzalez: yes
- Durazo: yes
- Menjivar: yes
- Wiener: yes
- Richardson: yes
- Valladares: other
- Grove: other
Placed on suspense file
2025-08-18 · pass · 7-0
Member-level votes (7)
- Richardson: yes
- Seyarto: yes
- Caballero: yes
- Cabaldon: yes
- Dahle: yes
- Wahab: yes
- Grayson: yes
Do pass
2025-08-29 · pass · 6-0
Member-level votes (7)
- Richardson: yes
- Grayson: yes
- Wahab: yes
- Dahle: yes
- Caballero: yes
- Cabaldon: yes
- Seyarto: other
3rd Reading AB682 Ortega et al. By Cortese
2025-09-09 · pass · 31-3
Member-level votes (40)
- Richardson: yes
- Menjivar: yes
- Cortese: yes
- Weber Pierson: yes
- McNerney: yes
- Stern: yes
- Smallwood-Cuevas: yes
- Becker: yes
- McGuire: yes
- Cervantes: yes
- Hurtado: yes
- Cabaldon: yes
- Rubio: yes
- Durazo: yes
- Laird: yes
- Padilla: yes
- Dahle: yes
- Limón: yes
- Pérez: yes
- Reyes: yes
- Archuleta: yes
- Wiener: yes
- Ashby: yes
- Arreguín: yes
- Grayson: yes
- Allen: yes
- Gonzalez: yes
- Caballero: yes
- Wahab: yes
- Umberg: yes
- Blakespear: yes
- Niello: no
- Strickland: no
- Grove: no
- Ochoa Bogh: other
- Jones: other
- Valladares: other
- Seyarto: other
- Choi: other
- Alvarado-Gil: other
AB 682 Ortega Concurrence in Senate Amendments
2025-09-11 · pass · 66-3
Member-level votes (80)
- Ahrens: yes
- Mark González: yes
- Quirk-Silva: yes
- Gipson: yes
- Rogers: yes
- Addis: yes
- Ward: yes
- Haney: yes
- Hart: yes
- Fong: yes
- Calderon: yes
- Elhawary: yes
- Wilson: yes
- Carrillo: yes
- Bains: yes
- Ransom: yes
- Soria: yes
- Michelle Rodriguez: yes
- Berman: yes
- Valencia: yes
- Wicks: yes
- Celeste Rodriguez: yes
- Arambula: yes
- Connolly: yes
- Schultz: yes
- Bauer-Kahan: yes
- Bennett: yes
- Papan: yes
- Schiavo: yes
- Bonta: yes
- Ávila Farías: yes
- Aguiar-Curry: yes
- Jeff Gonzalez: yes
- Pacheco: yes
- Boerner: yes
- Alvarez: yes
- Lee: yes
- Alanis: yes
- Wallis: yes
- Stefani: yes
- Caloza: yes
- Sharp-Collins: yes
- Nguyen: yes
- Ortega: yes
- Solache: yes
- Lowenthal: yes
- Blanca Rubio: yes
- Jackson: yes
- Bryan: yes
- Gallagher: yes
- Petrie-Norris: yes
- Harabedian: yes
- Gabriel: yes
- Zbur: yes
- Davies: yes
- McKinnor: yes
- Pellerin: yes
- Muratsuchi: yes
- Krell: yes
- Irwin: yes
- Ramos: yes
- Patel: yes
- Kalra: yes
- Sanchez: yes
- Rivas: yes
- Garcia: yes
- Ellis: no
- Macedo: no
- DeMaio: no
- Johnson: other
- Dixon: other
- Hoover: other
- Hadwick: other
- Tangipa: other
- Lackey: other
- Chen: other
- Castillo: other
- Flora: other
- Patterson: other
- Ta: other
Related bills
No related bills recorded for this bill.
Official source
Attribution
Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T01:34:27.960412Z
Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:
Use this data
Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=CA&identifier=AB 682. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.
Known limitations
- Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
- Committee referrals are not yet captured.
- Some documents have no extracted text yet, so version comparison may be limited.
See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.