CA AB 596
deadElections: ballot disclosures.
California · 2025-2026 Regular Session · lower
Quick answers
Did CA AB 596 pass?
No. CA AB 596 did not pass — it was defeated or died in the legislative process (2025-09-13). Latest recorded action (2025-09-13): Motion to reconsider made by Assembly Member Ortega.
What is CA AB 596 about?
Under existing law, the ballot label for a statewide measure contains a condensed version of the ballot title and summary prepared by the Attorney General, including a fiscal impact summary prepared by the Legislative Analyst, followed by a listing of the names of the measure's supporters and opponents. Existing law requires the Secretary of State to create an internet website or to use other available technology to consolidate information about each state ballot measure, including a list of the top 10 contributors supporting or opposing a measure, if compiled by the Fair Political Practices Commission. This bill would require the 3 largest contributors of $100,000 or more to all committees that paid for the circulation of a statewide initiative or statewide referendum measure to also be printed on the ballot immediately following the names of the measure's supporters and opponents. The Secretary of State would be required to make a copy of the top contributors available for public examination prior to printing that information on ballots, and voters would be authorized to seek a writ of mandate requiring the identified contributors to be amended or deleted. The bill would specify words and phrases that may be left out of a top contributor's name in order to shorten the name when printed on the ballot. The bill would apply its provisions only to proposed statewide initiative or statewide referendum measures for which the Attorney General delivers a circulating title and summary to the proponents on or after January 1, 2026. To the extent the bill would increase the duties of county elections officials relative to examining initiative and referendum petitions and printing ballots, it would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Who sponsors CA AB 596?
Ortega is the primary sponsor of CA AB 596.
Description
Under existing law, the ballot label for a statewide measure contains a condensed version of the ballot title and summary prepared by the Attorney General, including a fiscal impact summary prepared by the Legislative Analyst, followed by a listing of the names of the measure's supporters and opponents. Existing law requires the Secretary of State to create an internet website or to use other available technology to consolidate information about each state ballot measure, including a list of the top 10 contributors supporting or opposing a measure, if compiled by the Fair Political Practices Commission. This bill would require the 3 largest contributors of $100,000 or more to all committees that paid for the circulation of a statewide initiative or statewide referendum measure to also be printed on the ballot immediately following the names of the measure's supporters and opponents. The Secretary of State would be required to make a copy of the top contributors available for public examination prior to printing that information on ballots, and voters would be authorized to seek a writ of mandate requiring the identified contributors to be amended or deleted. The bill would specify words and phrases that may be left out of a top contributor's name in order to shorten the name when printed on the ballot. The bill would apply its provisions only to proposed statewide initiative or statewide referendum measures for which the Attorney General delivers a circulating title and summary to the proponents on or after January 1, 2026. To the extent the bill would increase the duties of county elections officials relative to examining initiative and referendum petitions and printing ballots, it would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
- Introduced
- 2025-03-10
- Latest action
- 2025-09-13 — Motion to reconsider made by Assembly Member Ortega.
- Bill type
- bill
- Last updated
- —
Subjects
Sponsors
- Ortegaauthor
Committees
Not provided by source.
Action timeline
2025-02-13
Read first time. To print.
reading-1
2025-02-14
From printer. May be heard in committee March 16.
2025-02-24
Referred to Com. on L. & E.
referral-committee
2025-03-10
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on L. & E. Read second time and amended.
amendment-introduction,amendment-passage,committee-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee
2025-03-11
Re-referred to Com. on L. & E.
referral-committee
2025-03-19
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (March 19). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable,referral-committee
2025-04-23
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 11. Noes 2.) (April 23).
committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable
2025-04-24
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
reading-1,reading-2,reading-3
2025-04-28
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 63. Noes 10. Page 1317.)
passage,reading-1,reading-3
2025-04-29
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
reading-1,referral-committee
2025-05-28
Referred to Com. on L., P.E. & R.
referral-committee
2025-06-11
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (June 11).
amendment-introduction,amendment-passage,committee-passage,referral-committee
2025-06-12
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
amendment-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee
2025-06-23
From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
committee-passage,reading-1,reading-2
2025-06-24
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
reading-1,reading-2,reading-3
2025-09-09
Re-referred to Com. on E. & C.A.
referral-committee
2025-09-09
Joint Rules 61 and 62(a) suspended. (Ayes 30. Noes 9. Page 2731.)
2025-09-09
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
amendment-passage,reading-1,reading-2,reading-3
2025-09-09
Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10(C).
referral-committee
2025-09-09
Joint Rule 61(a)(13) suspended. (Ayes 28. Noes 8. Page 2568.)
2025-09-10
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 1.) (September 10). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable,referral-committee
2025-09-11
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 4. Noes 2.) (September 11).
committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable
2025-09-12
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
reading-1,reading-2,reading-3
2025-09-12
Senate Rule 29 suspended. (Page 2961.)
2025-09-12
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 26. Noes 9. Page 3004.).
passage,reading-1,reading-3
2025-09-13
Assembly refused to concur in Senate amendments. (Ayes 37. Noes 22. Page 3513.)
committee-failure
2025-09-13
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
2025-09-13
Assembly Rule 63 suspended. (Page 3477.)
2025-09-13
Joint Rules 61(a)(14) and 51(a)(4) suspended. (Ayes 59. Noes 20. Page 3413.)
2025-09-13
Motion to reconsider made by Assembly Member Ortega.
Versions
Documents
- application/pdf
- application/pdf
- application/pdf
- application/pdf
- text/html
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
Votes
Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]
2025-03-19 · pass · 6-0
Member-level votes (7)
- Ortega: yes
- Lee: yes
- Kalra: yes
- Ward: yes
- Elhawary: yes
- Chen: yes
- Flora: other
Do pass.
2025-04-23 · pass · 11-2
Member-level votes (15)
- Pacheco: yes
- Arambula: yes
- Wicks: yes
- Hart: yes
- Solache: yes
- Pellerin: yes
- Mark González: yes
- Calderon: yes
- Fong: yes
- Caloza: yes
- Elhawary: yes
- Ta: no
- Tangipa: no
- Sanchez: other
- Dixon: other
AB 596 McKinnor Assembly Third Reading
2025-04-28 · pass · 63-10
Member-level votes (79)
- Michelle Rodriguez: yes
- Ward: yes
- Patel: yes
- Valencia: yes
- Ransom: yes
- Gipson: yes
- Wicks: yes
- Dixon: yes
- Addis: yes
- Boerner: yes
- Garcia: yes
- Zbur: yes
- Bonta: yes
- Carrillo: yes
- McKinnor: yes
- Alanis: yes
- Muratsuchi: yes
- Jackson: yes
- Gabriel: yes
- Bennett: yes
- Petrie-Norris: yes
- Schultz: yes
- Ortega: yes
- Aguiar-Curry: yes
- Arambula: yes
- Celeste Rodriguez: yes
- Harabedian: yes
- Quirk-Silva: yes
- Rogers: yes
- Wallis: yes
- Fong: yes
- Nguyen: yes
- Ahrens: yes
- Davies: yes
- Elhawary: yes
- Calderon: yes
- Mark González: yes
- Lowenthal: yes
- Pacheco: yes
- Schiavo: yes
- Kalra: yes
- Soria: yes
- Wilson: yes
- Alvarez: yes
- Irwin: yes
- Haney: yes
- Hart: yes
- Rivas: yes
- Ramos: yes
- Sharp-Collins: yes
- Stefani: yes
- Lee: yes
- Pellerin: yes
- Ávila Farías: yes
- Bains: yes
- Bauer-Kahan: yes
- Caloza: yes
- Krell: yes
- Bryan: yes
- Berman: yes
- Chen: yes
- Connolly: yes
- Papan: yes
- Tangipa: no
- Castillo: no
- DeMaio: no
- Macedo: no
- Jeff Gonzalez: no
- Hoover: no
- Gallagher: no
- Hadwick: no
- Ta: no
- Lackey: no
- Sanchez: other
- Flora: other
- Blanca Rubio: other
- Patterson: other
- Solache: other
- Ellis: other
Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to the Committee on [Appropriations]
2025-06-11 · pass · 5-0
Member-level votes (5)
- Laird: yes
- Cortese: yes
- Smallwood-Cuevas: yes
- Strickland: yes
- Durazo: yes
Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]
2025-09-10 · pass · 4-1
Member-level votes (5)
- Limón: yes
- Umberg: yes
- Allen: yes
- Cervantes: yes
- Choi: no
Do pass
2025-09-11 · pass · 4-2
Member-level votes (7)
- Wahab: yes
- Cabaldon: yes
- Richardson: yes
- Caballero: yes
- Seyarto: no
- Dahle: no
- Grayson: other
2nd Reading AB596 Ortega By Cervantes
2025-09-12 · pass · 26-9
Member-level votes (40)
- McGuire: yes
- Becker: yes
- Caballero: yes
- McNerney: yes
- Grayson: yes
- Umberg: yes
- Padilla: yes
- Cervantes: yes
- Menjivar: yes
- Wiener: yes
- Wahab: yes
- Laird: yes
- Stern: yes
- Rubio: yes
- Richardson: yes
- Hurtado: yes
- Reyes: yes
- Blakespear: yes
- Arreguín: yes
- Ashby: yes
- Allen: yes
- Smallwood-Cuevas: yes
- Durazo: yes
- Archuleta: yes
- Limón: yes
- Cortese: yes
- Strickland: no
- Cabaldon: no
- Seyarto: no
- Niello: no
- Jones: no
- Ochoa Bogh: no
- Grove: no
- Dahle: no
- Alvarado-Gil: no
- Weber Pierson: other
- Choi: other
- Valladares: other
- Pérez: other
- Gonzalez: other
AB 596 ORTEGA Concurrence in Senate Amendments
2025-09-13 · fail · 37-22
Member-level votes (80)
- Ahrens: yes
- Rogers: yes
- Ward: yes
- Haney: yes
- Hart: yes
- Fong: yes
- Elhawary: yes
- Calderon: yes
- Wilson: yes
- Bains: yes
- Ransom: yes
- Celeste Rodriguez: yes
- Arambula: yes
- Connolly: yes
- Schultz: yes
- Bauer-Kahan: yes
- Schiavo: yes
- Bonta: yes
- Aguiar-Curry: yes
- Boerner: yes
- Lee: yes
- Stefani: yes
- Caloza: yes
- Sharp-Collins: yes
- Ortega: yes
- Lowenthal: yes
- Jackson: yes
- Bryan: yes
- Harabedian: yes
- Zbur: yes
- McKinnor: yes
- Muratsuchi: yes
- Krell: yes
- Ramos: yes
- Kalra: yes
- Rivas: yes
- Garcia: yes
- Johnson: no
- Dixon: no
- Ávila Farías: no
- Jeff Gonzalez: no
- Castillo: no
- Alanis: no
- Wallis: no
- Patterson: no
- Ta: no
- Hoover: no
- Gallagher: no
- Macedo: no
- Ellis: no
- Davies: no
- DeMaio: no
- Pellerin: no
- Hadwick: no
- Tangipa: no
- Lackey: no
- Sanchez: no
- Chen: no
- Flora: no
- Mark González: other
- Quirk-Silva: other
- Gipson: other
- Addis: other
- Carrillo: other
- Soria: other
- Michelle Rodriguez: other
- Berman: other
- Valencia: other
- Wicks: other
- Bennett: other
- Papan: other
- Pacheco: other
- Alvarez: other
- Nguyen: other
- Solache: other
- Blanca Rubio: other
- Petrie-Norris: other
- Gabriel: other
- Irwin: other
- Patel: other
Related bills
No related bills recorded for this bill.
Official source
Attribution
Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T01:34:27.960412Z
Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:
Use this data
Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=CA&identifier=AB 596. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.
Known limitations
- Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
- Committee referrals are not yet captured.
- Some documents have no extracted text yet, so version comparison may be limited.
See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.