Bill Commons

CA AB 498

enacted

Self-service storage facilities: lien notices: email.

California · 2025-2026 Regular Session · lower

Quick answers

Did CA AB 498 pass?

Yes. CA AB 498 has been enacted into law as of 2025-10-06. Latest recorded action (2025-10-06): Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 369, Statutes of 2025.

What is CA AB 498 about?

Existing law, the California Self-Storage Facility Act, authorizes a self-storage facility owner to terminate the right of an occupant to the use of a storage space if rent or other charges due remain unpaid for 14 consecutive days by sending a lien notice and the total sum due has not been paid by the termination date specified in the preliminary lien notice, in accordance with specified procedures. Existing law authorizes an owner to send lien notices to the occupant by email if the rental agreement states that lien notices may be sent by email and the occupant provides a written signature on the rental agreement consenting to receive lien notices by email. Existing law specifies the ways an owner may demonstrate actual delivery and receipt of the lien notices sent by email, including by posting the document on the owner's secure internet website and there is evidence demonstrating that the occupant logged onto the licensee's secure internet website and downloaded, printed, viewed, or otherwise acknowledged receipt of the document. This bill, instead, would provide that an owner may demonstrate actual delivery and receipt of a lien notice by delivering the document to the occupant's email address and there is evidence demonstrating that the occupant downloaded, printed, viewed, opened, or otherwise acknowledged receipt of the document.

Who sponsors CA AB 498?

Michelle Rodriguez is the primary sponsor of CA AB 498.

Description

Existing law, the California Self-Storage Facility Act, authorizes a self-storage facility owner to terminate the right of an occupant to the use of a storage space if rent or other charges due remain unpaid for 14 consecutive days by sending a lien notice and the total sum due has not been paid by the termination date specified in the preliminary lien notice, in accordance with specified procedures. Existing law authorizes an owner to send lien notices to the occupant by email if the rental agreement states that lien notices may be sent by email and the occupant provides a written signature on the rental agreement consenting to receive lien notices by email. Existing law specifies the ways an owner may demonstrate actual delivery and receipt of the lien notices sent by email, including by posting the document on the owner's secure internet website and there is evidence demonstrating that the occupant logged onto the licensee's secure internet website and downloaded, printed, viewed, or otherwise acknowledged receipt of the document. This bill, instead, would provide that an owner may demonstrate actual delivery and receipt of a lien notice by delivering the document to the occupant's email address and there is evidence demonstrating that the occupant downloaded, printed, viewed, opened, or otherwise acknowledged receipt of the document.

Introduced
2025-03-17
Latest action
2025-10-06 — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 369, Statutes of 2025.
Bill type
bill
Last updated

Subjects

Sponsors

  • Michelle Rodriguezauthor

Committees

Not provided by source.

Action timeline

  1. 2025-02-10

    Read first time. To print.

    reading-1

  2. 2025-02-11

    From printer. May be heard in committee March 13.

  3. 2025-02-24

    Referred to Com. on JUD.

    referral-committee

  4. 2025-03-17

    From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on JUD. Read second time and amended.

    amendment-introduction,amendment-passage,committee-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee

  5. 2025-03-18

    Re-referred to Com. on JUD.

    referral-committee

  6. 2025-03-26

    From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (March 25).

    committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable

  7. 2025-03-27

    Read second time. Ordered to Consent Calendar.

    reading-1,reading-2

  8. 2025-04-01

    Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 76. Noes 0.)

    passage,reading-1,reading-3

  9. 2025-04-02

    In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

    reading-1,referral-committee

  10. 2025-05-07

    Referred to Com. on JUD.

    referral-committee

  11. 2025-07-08

    In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

  12. 2025-07-16

    From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 13. Noes 0.) (July 15).

    committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable

  13. 2025-07-17

    Read second time. Ordered to Consent Calendar.

    reading-1,reading-2

  14. 2025-08-25

    Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 37. Noes 0. Page 2249.).

    passage,reading-1,reading-3

  15. 2025-08-26

    In Assembly. Ordered to Engrossing and Enrolling.

    committee-passage

  16. 2025-09-02

    Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3 p.m.

    executive-receipt

  17. 2025-10-06

    Approved by the Governor.

    executive-signature

  18. 2025-10-06

    Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 369, Statutes of 2025.

    became-law

Versions

  • 02/10/25 - Introduced — 2025-02-10Compare
  • 03/17/25 - Amended Assembly — 2025-03-17Compare
  • 08/27/25 - Enrolled — 2025-08-27Compare
  • 10/06/25 - Chaptered — 2025-10-06Compare
  • AB498Compare
  • (document, no version)Compare

Documents

Votes

  • Do pass. To Consent Calendar.

    2025-03-25 · pass · 12-0

    Member-level votes (12)
    • Zbur: yes
    • Dixon: yes
    • Harabedian: yes
    • Kalra: yes
    • Stefani: yes
    • Essayli: yes
    • Bauer-Kahan: yes
    • Pacheco: yes
    • Connolly: yes
    • Sanchez: yes
    • Papan: yes
    • Bryan: yes
  • AB 498 Michelle Rodriguez Consent Calendar Second Day

    2025-04-01 · pass · 76-0

    Member-level votes (80)
    • Haney: yes
    • Jeff Gonzalez: yes
    • Patel: yes
    • Ahrens: yes
    • Calderon: yes
    • Chen: yes
    • Kalra: yes
    • Sanchez: yes
    • Boerner: yes
    • Muratsuchi: yes
    • Papan: yes
    • Michelle Rodriguez: yes
    • Pellerin: yes
    • Jackson: yes
    • Petrie-Norris: yes
    • Fong: yes
    • Aguiar-Curry: yes
    • Lee: yes
    • Harabedian: yes
    • Celeste Rodriguez: yes
    • Hoover: yes
    • Lowenthal: yes
    • Connolly: yes
    • Garcia: yes
    • Pacheco: yes
    • Schultz: yes
    • Valencia: yes
    • Bains: yes
    • McKinnor: yes
    • Alanis: yes
    • Carrillo: yes
    • Arambula: yes
    • Castillo: yes
    • Ta: yes
    • Ellis: yes
    • Rivas: yes
    • Gipson: yes
    • Elhawary: yes
    • Ávila Farías: yes
    • Blanca Rubio: yes
    • Ransom: yes
    • Dixon: yes
    • Macedo: yes
    • Krell: yes
    • Ramos: yes
    • Zbur: yes
    • Tangipa: yes
    • Wilson: yes
    • Hart: yes
    • Hadwick: yes
    • Soria: yes
    • Stefani: yes
    • Quirk-Silva: yes
    • Schiavo: yes
    • Bauer-Kahan: yes
    • Gallagher: yes
    • DeMaio: yes
    • Caloza: yes
    • Irwin: yes
    • Nguyen: yes
    • Solache: yes
    • Ortega: yes
    • Wallis: yes
    • Bryan: yes
    • Addis: yes
    • Lackey: yes
    • Patterson: yes
    • Sharp-Collins: yes
    • Bonta: yes
    • Essayli: yes
    • Flora: yes
    • Mark González: yes
    • Rogers: yes
    • Ward: yes
    • Gabriel: yes
    • Berman: yes
    • Davies: other
    • Alvarez: other
    • Bennett: other
    • Wicks: other
  • Do pass and be ordered to the Consent Calendar

    2025-07-15 · pass · 13-0

    Member-level votes (13)
    • Caballero: yes
    • Niello: yes
    • Ashby: yes
    • Wahab: yes
    • Laird: yes
    • Umberg: yes
    • Weber Pierson: yes
    • Wiener: yes
    • Stern: yes
    • Valladares: yes
    • Allen: yes
    • Arreguín: yes
    • Durazo: yes
  • Consent Calendar 2nd AB498 Michelle Rodriguez

    2025-08-25 · pass · 37-0

    Member-level votes (40)
    • Reyes: yes
    • Allen: yes
    • Jones: yes
    • Menjivar: yes
    • Dahle: yes
    • Niello: yes
    • Pérez: yes
    • Wahab: yes
    • Weber Pierson: yes
    • Ochoa Bogh: yes
    • Grove: yes
    • Cabaldon: yes
    • Wiener: yes
    • Blakespear: yes
    • Choi: yes
    • Richardson: yes
    • Limón: yes
    • McNerney: yes
    • Becker: yes
    • Arreguín: yes
    • Archuleta: yes
    • Grayson: yes
    • Cortese: yes
    • Cervantes: yes
    • Laird: yes
    • Stern: yes
    • McGuire: yes
    • Seyarto: yes
    • Umberg: yes
    • Caballero: yes
    • Durazo: yes
    • Smallwood-Cuevas: yes
    • Strickland: yes
    • Gonzalez: yes
    • Padilla: yes
    • Ashby: yes
    • Valladares: yes
    • Hurtado: other
    • Alvarado-Gil: other
    • Rubio: other

Related bills

No related bills recorded for this bill.

Official source

Attribution

Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T01:34:27.960412Z

Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:

Use this data

Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=CA&identifier=AB 498. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.

Known limitations

  • Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
  • Committee referrals are not yet captured.
  • Some documents have no extracted text yet, so version comparison may be limited.

See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.