Bill Commons

CA AB 459

dead

Initiatives: qualification: electronic signatures.

California · 2025-2026 Regular Session · lower

Quick answers

Did CA AB 459 pass?

No. CA AB 459 did not pass — it was defeated or died in the legislative process (2026-02-02). Latest recorded action (2026-02-02): From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.

What is CA AB 459 about?

Existing law prescribes the procedures for circulating an initiative, referendum, or recall petition for signature by voters. This bill would require the Secretary of State to develop a system that allows a proponent of a state or local initiative, referendum, or recall petition to have the petition posted on the Secretary of State's internet website where a voter can electronically sign the petition. The bill would require the Secretary of State and elections officials to perform specified tasks in connection with the electronic circulation of petitions, including verifying the electronic signatures, as specified. By imposing additional duties on elections officials, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.

Who sponsors CA AB 459?

DeMaio is the primary sponsor of CA AB 459.

Description

Existing law prescribes the procedures for circulating an initiative, referendum, or recall petition for signature by voters. This bill would require the Secretary of State to develop a system that allows a proponent of a state or local initiative, referendum, or recall petition to have the petition posted on the Secretary of State's internet website where a voter can electronically sign the petition. The bill would require the Secretary of State and elections officials to perform specified tasks in connection with the electronic circulation of petitions, including verifying the electronic signatures, as specified. By imposing additional duties on elections officials, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.

Introduced
2025-03-28
Latest action
2026-02-02 — From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
Bill type
bill
Last updated

Subjects

Sponsors

  • DeMaioauthor

Committees

Not provided by source.

Action timeline

  1. 2025-02-06

    Read first time. To print.

    reading-1

  2. 2025-02-07

    From printer. May be heard in committee March 9.

  3. 2025-03-28

    From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on ELECTIONS. Read second time and amended.

    amendment-introduction,amendment-passage,committee-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee

  4. 2025-03-28

    Referred to Com. on ELECTIONS.

    referral-committee

  5. 2025-04-01

    Re-referred to Com. on ELECTIONS.

    referral-committee

  6. 2025-04-08

    From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on ELECTIONS. Read second time and amended.

    amendment-introduction,amendment-passage,committee-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee

  7. 2025-04-09

    Re-referred to Com. on ELECTIONS.

    referral-committee

  8. 2025-04-30

    In committee: Set, first hearing. Failed passage. Reconsideration granted.

    committee-passage-unfavorable

  9. 2026-01-31

    Died pursuant to Art. IV, Sec. 10(c) of the Constitution.

    failure

  10. 2026-02-02

    From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.

    committee-passage,failure

Versions

  • 02/06/25 - Introduced — 2025-02-06Compare
  • 03/28/25 - Amended Assembly — 2025-03-28Compare
  • 04/08/25 - Amended Assembly — 2025-04-08Compare
  • AB459Compare
  • (document, no version)Compare

Documents

Votes

  • Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]

    2025-04-30 · fail · 2-4

    Member-level votes (7)
    • Lackey: yes
    • Macedo: yes
    • Solache: no
    • Pellerin: no
    • Stefani: no
    • Berman: no
    • Bennett: other
  • Reconsideration.

    2025-04-30 · pass · 5-0

    Member-level votes (7)
    • Macedo: yes
    • Lackey: yes
    • Solache: yes
    • Pellerin: yes
    • Berman: yes
    • Bennett: other
    • Stefani: other

Related bills

No related bills recorded for this bill.

Official source

Attribution

Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T01:34:27.960412Z

Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:

Use this data

Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=CA&identifier=AB 459. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.

Known limitations

  • Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
  • Committee referrals are not yet captured.
  • Some documents have no extracted text yet, so version comparison may be limited.

See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.