CA AB 439
enactedCalifornia Coastal Act of 1976: local planning and reporting.
California · 2025-2026 Regular Session · lower
Subscribe in a feed reader. The feed covers recorded actions from the last 30 days; Bill Commons may record an action after it happened at the legislature.
Quick answers
Did CA AB 439 pass?
Yes. CA AB 439 has been enacted into law. Latest recorded action (2025-10-10): Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 556, Statutes of 2025.
What is CA AB 439 about?
Existing law, the California Coastal Act of 1976 (the Coastal Act) , among other things, requires anyone wishing to perform or undertake any development in the coastal zone, except as specified, in addition to obtaining any other permit required by law from any local government or from any state, regional, or local agency, to obtain a coastal development permit, as provided. The Coastal Act generally requires each local government, as specified, to prepare a local coastal program, for certification by the California Coastal Commission. Existing law also imposes an analogous requirement on port governing bodies to prepare port master plans, for certification by the commission. With regard to local coastal programs and port master plans, existing law provides that an amendment determined to be de minimis by the executive director of the commission, after notice in the agenda of the next scheduled commission meeting, becomes a part of the certified program or plan 10 days after the commission meeting if 3 or more members of the commission do not object to the de minimis determination. This bill would make de minimis amendments to local coastal programs and port master plans effective upon adjournment of that meeting if 3 or more members of the commission do not object to the de minimis determination. The Coastal Act authorizes the commission to impose specified administrative penalties on a person, including a landowner, who is in violation of any provision of the act other than public access, and separate administrative penalties for violations relating to public access. Regarding the violations of the act unrelated to public access, existing law requires the commission staff to annually prepare and present a written report to the full commission that includes specified information related to the imposition of those penalties and to annually provide the written report to the Legislature, as prescribed. This bill would require the commission staff to prepare and present a written report to the full commission every 5 years instead of annually, as specified, and would require the report to address public access violations as well. The bill would require the report to include, in addition, the number of violations referred to the Attorney General, the number of pending violations at the end of the reporting period, and summaries of violations that were resolved that are both illustrative of the commission's enforcement workload and that provided significant public benefit. This bill would repeal an obsolete reporting requirement that concerned violations of the act related to public access.
Who sponsors CA AB 439?
Rogers is the primary sponsor of CA AB 439.
Description
Existing law, the California Coastal Act of 1976 (the Coastal Act) , among other things, requires anyone wishing to perform or undertake any development in the coastal zone, except as specified, in addition to obtaining any other permit required by law from any local government or from any state, regional, or local agency, to obtain a coastal development permit, as provided. The Coastal Act generally requires each local government, as specified, to prepare a local coastal program, for certification by the California Coastal Commission. Existing law also imposes an analogous requirement on port governing bodies to prepare port master plans, for certification by the commission. With regard to local coastal programs and port master plans, existing law provides that an amendment determined to be de minimis by the executive director of the commission, after notice in the agenda of the next scheduled commission meeting, becomes a part of the certified program or plan 10 days after the commission meeting if 3 or more members of the commission do not object to the de minimis determination. This bill would make de minimis amendments to local coastal programs and port master plans effective upon adjournment of that meeting if 3 or more members of the commission do not object to the de minimis determination. The Coastal Act authorizes the commission to impose specified administrative penalties on a person, including a landowner, who is in violation of any provision of the act other than public access, and separate administrative penalties for violations relating to public access. Regarding the violations of the act unrelated to public access, existing law requires the commission staff to annually prepare and present a written report to the full commission that includes specified information related to the imposition of those penalties and to annually provide the written report to the Legislature, as prescribed. This bill would require the commission staff to prepare and present a written report to the full commission every 5 years instead of annually, as specified, and would require the report to address public access violations as well. The bill would require the report to include, in addition, the number of violations referred to the Attorney General, the number of pending violations at the end of the reporting period, and summaries of violations that were resolved that are both illustrative of the commission's enforcement workload and that provided significant public benefit. This bill would repeal an obsolete reporting requirement that concerned violations of the act related to public access.
- Introduced
- —
- Latest action
- 2025-10-10 — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 556, Statutes of 2025.
- Bill type
- bill
- Last updated
- —
Subjects
Sponsors
- Rogersauthor
Committees
Not provided by source.
Action timeline
Newest first
2025-10-10
Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 556, Statutes of 2025.
became-law
2025-10-10
Approved by the Governor.
executive-signature
2025-09-09
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3 p.m.
executive-receipt
2025-09-03
In Assembly. Ordered to Engrossing and Enrolling.
committee-passage
2025-09-03
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 31. Noes 8. Page 2457.).
passage,reading-1,reading-3
2025-06-24
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
reading-1,reading-2,reading-3
2025-06-23
From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
committee-passage,reading-1,reading-2
2025-06-10
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 1.) (June 10). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable,referral-committee
2025-05-07
Referred to Com. on N.R. & W.
referral-committee
2025-04-29
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
reading-1,referral-committee
2025-04-28
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 54. Noes 13. Page 1314.)
passage,reading-1,reading-3
2025-04-10
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
reading-1,reading-2,reading-3
2025-04-09
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 10. Noes 2.) (April 9).
committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable
2025-03-25
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 11. Noes 1.) (March 24). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable,referral-committee
2025-02-18
Referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
referral-committee
2025-02-07
From printer. May be heard in committee March 9.
2025-02-06
Read first time. To print.
reading-1
Versions
Documents
- application/pdf
- application/pdf
- application/pdf
- text/html
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
Votes
Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]
2025-03-24 · pass · 11-1
Member-level votes (14)
- Zbur: yes
- Haney: yes
- Schultz: yes
- Alanis: yes
- Flora: yes
- Muratsuchi: yes
- Bryan: yes
- Connolly: yes
- Garcia: yes
- Kalra: yes
- Pellerin: yes
- Davies: no
- Wicks: other
- Sanchez: other
Do pass.
2025-04-09 · pass · 10-2
Member-level votes (15)
- Mark González: yes
- Pacheco: yes
- Solache: yes
- Hart: yes
- Wicks: yes
- Arambula: yes
- Fong: yes
- Calderon: yes
- Elhawary: yes
- Caloza: yes
- Ta: no
- Dixon: no
- Sanchez: other
- Hadwick: other
- Pellerin: other
AB 439 Rogers Assembly Third Reading
2025-04-28 · pass · 54-13
Member-level votes (79)
- Michelle Rodriguez: yes
- Ward: yes
- Patel: yes
- Valencia: yes
- Ransom: yes
- Gipson: yes
- Wicks: yes
- Addis: yes
- Boerner: yes
- Garcia: yes
- Zbur: yes
- Bonta: yes
- Carrillo: yes
- McKinnor: yes
- Alanis: yes
- Muratsuchi: yes
- Jackson: yes
- Gabriel: yes
- Petrie-Norris: yes
- Schultz: yes
- Ortega: yes
- Aguiar-Curry: yes
- Arambula: yes
- Celeste Rodriguez: yes
- Harabedian: yes
- Rogers: yes
- Wallis: yes
- Fong: yes
- Nguyen: yes
- Ahrens: yes
- Elhawary: yes
- Calderon: yes
- Mark González: yes
- Lowenthal: yes
- Pacheco: yes
- Schiavo: yes
- Kalra: yes
- Solache: yes
- Rivas: yes
- Irwin: yes
- Haney: yes
- Hart: yes
- Ramos: yes
- Sharp-Collins: yes
- Stefani: yes
- Lee: yes
- Pellerin: yes
- Ávila Farías: yes
- Bauer-Kahan: yes
- Caloza: yes
- Bryan: yes
- Berman: yes
- Connolly: yes
- Papan: yes
- Jeff Gonzalez: no
- Tangipa: no
- Davies: no
- Castillo: no
- DeMaio: no
- Patterson: no
- Macedo: no
- Dixon: no
- Hoover: no
- Gallagher: no
- Ellis: no
- Ta: no
- Lackey: no
- Sanchez: other
- Blanca Rubio: other
- Flora: other
- Hadwick: other
- Bennett: other
- Bains: other
- Soria: other
- Krell: other
- Quirk-Silva: other
- Wilson: other
- Chen: other
- Alvarez: other
Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]
2025-06-10 · pass · 6-1
Member-level votes (7)
- Limón: yes
- Stern: yes
- Grove: yes
- Allen: yes
- Laird: yes
- Hurtado: yes
- Seyarto: no
3rd Reading AB439 Rogers By Allen
2025-09-03 · pass · 31-8
Member-level votes (40)
- Becker: yes
- Arreguín: yes
- Durazo: yes
- Gonzalez: yes
- Stern: yes
- Cabaldon: yes
- Blakespear: yes
- Rubio: yes
- Hurtado: yes
- Ashby: yes
- Limón: yes
- Wiener: yes
- Allen: yes
- Padilla: yes
- McNerney: yes
- Pérez: yes
- Cortese: yes
- Smallwood-Cuevas: yes
- Menjivar: yes
- Grayson: yes
- McGuire: yes
- Cervantes: yes
- Weber Pierson: yes
- Richardson: yes
- Archuleta: yes
- Laird: yes
- Grove: yes
- Wahab: yes
- Umberg: yes
- Reyes: yes
- Caballero: yes
- Strickland: no
- Jones: no
- Valladares: no
- Alvarado-Gil: no
- Niello: no
- Ochoa Bogh: no
- Seyarto: no
- Choi: no
- Dahle: other
Related bills
No related bills recorded for this bill.
Official source
Attribution
Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T01:34:27.960412Z
Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:
Session-wide evidence can include changes to other bills:
Use this data
Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=CA&identifier=AB 439. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.
Known limitations
- Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
- Committee referrals are not yet captured.
- Some documents have no extracted text yet, so version comparison may be limited.
See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.