CA AB 391
enactedMobilehome parks: notices to homeowners and residents.
California · 2025-2026 Regular Session · lower
Subscribe in a feed reader. The feed covers recorded actions from the last 30 days; Bill Commons may record an action after it happened at the legislature.
Quick answers
Did CA AB 391 pass?
Yes. CA AB 391 has been enacted into law. Latest recorded action (2025-10-06): Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 339, Statutes of 2025.
What is CA AB 391 about?
Existing law, the Mobilehome Residency Law, governs the terms and conditions of residency in mobilehome parks and prescribes the content of a rental agreement for a tenancy. Existing law requires that a copy of the Mobilehome Residency Law be provided as an exhibit and incorporated into the rental agreement by reference, as specified. Existing law also requires that a copy of a specified notice containing the rights and responsibilities of homeowners and park managers be included in the rental agreement and requires management to provide a copy of the notice to all homeowners each year, as specified. Existing law requires these and other notices required by the Mobilehome Residency Law to be either personally delivered to the homeowner or sent by mail, as specified, to the homeowner, unless otherwise provided. Existing law allows all notices required by the Mobilehome Residency Law to be delivered before February 1 of each year to be combined into one notice, as specified. This bill would, instead, require notices required by the Mobilehome Residency Law to be delivered to both the homeowner and resident of the mobilehome. The bill would also authorize the notices required by the Mobilehome Residency Law to be delivered prior to February 1 of each year to be delivered by electronic mail if the homeowner or resident has provided affirmative, written consent, as defined. The bill would allow a homeowner or resident to revoke their consent to receive notices by electronic mail at any time, without any fee, charge, or penalty, and without any impact to the terms of their tenancy, as specified. The bill would require management to deliver personally or by mail to the homeowner or resident a notice stating that the homeowner or resident has agreed to receive notices by electronic mail and may revoke this agreement, as provided. This bill would make nonsubstantive changes reflective of existing law, as provided.
Who sponsors CA AB 391?
Michelle Rodriguez is the primary sponsor of CA AB 391.
Description
Existing law, the Mobilehome Residency Law, governs the terms and conditions of residency in mobilehome parks and prescribes the content of a rental agreement for a tenancy. Existing law requires that a copy of the Mobilehome Residency Law be provided as an exhibit and incorporated into the rental agreement by reference, as specified. Existing law also requires that a copy of a specified notice containing the rights and responsibilities of homeowners and park managers be included in the rental agreement and requires management to provide a copy of the notice to all homeowners each year, as specified. Existing law requires these and other notices required by the Mobilehome Residency Law to be either personally delivered to the homeowner or sent by mail, as specified, to the homeowner, unless otherwise provided. Existing law allows all notices required by the Mobilehome Residency Law to be delivered before February 1 of each year to be combined into one notice, as specified. This bill would, instead, require notices required by the Mobilehome Residency Law to be delivered to both the homeowner and resident of the mobilehome. The bill would also authorize the notices required by the Mobilehome Residency Law to be delivered prior to February 1 of each year to be delivered by electronic mail if the homeowner or resident has provided affirmative, written consent, as defined. The bill would allow a homeowner or resident to revoke their consent to receive notices by electronic mail at any time, without any fee, charge, or penalty, and without any impact to the terms of their tenancy, as specified. The bill would require management to deliver personally or by mail to the homeowner or resident a notice stating that the homeowner or resident has agreed to receive notices by electronic mail and may revoke this agreement, as provided. This bill would make nonsubstantive changes reflective of existing law, as provided.
- Introduced
- 2025-05-07
- Latest action
- 2025-10-06 — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 339, Statutes of 2025.
- Bill type
- bill
- Last updated
- —
Subjects
Sponsors
- Michelle Rodriguezauthor
Committees
Not provided by source.
Action timeline
Newest first
2025-10-06
Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 339, Statutes of 2025.
became-law
2025-10-06
Approved by the Governor.
executive-signature
2025-09-09
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3 p.m.
executive-receipt
2025-09-03
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 79. Noes 0. Page 2856.).
amendment-passage,committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable
2025-09-02
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
2025-09-02
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 40. Noes 0. Page 2390.).
passage,reading-1,reading-3
2025-07-09
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
reading-1,reading-2,reading-3
2025-07-08
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
amendment-passage,reading-1,reading-2,reading-3
2025-06-27
Ordered to third reading.
reading-1,reading-3
2025-06-27
From Consent Calendar.
2025-06-19
Read second time and amended. Ordered to consent calendar.
amendment-passage,reading-1,reading-2
2025-06-18
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (June 17).
amendment-introduction,amendment-passage,committee-passage
2025-05-28
Referred to Com. on JUD.
referral-committee
2025-05-15
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
reading-1,referral-committee
2025-05-15
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 69. Noes 0. Page 1570.)
passage,reading-1,reading-3
2025-05-12
Read second time. Ordered to Consent Calendar.
reading-1,reading-2
2025-05-08
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
amendment-passage,reading-1,reading-2
2025-05-07
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (May 7).
amendment-introduction,amendment-passage,committee-passage
2025-04-29
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
2025-02-18
Referred to Com. on H. & C.D.
referral-committee
2025-02-04
From printer. May be heard in committee March 6.
2025-02-03
Read first time. To print.
reading-1
Versions
Documents
- application/pdf
- application/pdf
- application/pdf
- application/pdf
- application/pdf
- application/pdf
- text/html
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
Votes
Do pass as amended. To Consent Calendar.
2025-05-07 · pass · 12-0
Member-level votes (12)
- Patterson: yes
- Wilson: yes
- Quirk-Silva: yes
- Wicks: yes
- Garcia: yes
- Haney: yes
- Lee: yes
- Ávila Farías: yes
- Kalra: yes
- Ta: yes
- Caloza: yes
- Tangipa: yes
AB 391 Michelle Rodriguez Consent Calendar Second Day
2025-05-15 · pass · 69-0
Member-level votes (79)
- Gallagher: yes
- Wallis: yes
- Hadwick: yes
- Rogers: yes
- Bryan: yes
- Addis: yes
- Krell: yes
- Solache: yes
- Bauer-Kahan: yes
- Celeste Rodriguez: yes
- Elhawary: yes
- Soria: yes
- Jackson: yes
- Papan: yes
- Mark González: yes
- Harabedian: yes
- Ward: yes
- Macedo: yes
- Wicks: yes
- Zbur: yes
- Rivas: yes
- Patterson: yes
- Schiavo: yes
- Blanca Rubio: yes
- Lowenthal: yes
- Pellerin: yes
- Kalra: yes
- Muratsuchi: yes
- Ahrens: yes
- Berman: yes
- Pacheco: yes
- Sharp-Collins: yes
- Davies: yes
- Haney: yes
- Dixon: yes
- Ellis: yes
- Lee: yes
- Quirk-Silva: other
- Alanis: other
- Stefani: other
- Bennett: other
- Hart: other
- Arambula: other
- Jeff Gonzalez: other
- Caloza: other
- Castillo: other
- Ramos: other
- Alvarez: yes
- Gabriel: yes
- Ortega: yes
- Petrie-Norris: yes
- McKinnor: yes
- Nguyen: yes
- Tangipa: yes
- Sanchez: yes
- Gipson: yes
- Carrillo: yes
- Fong: yes
- Calderon: yes
- Bains: yes
- Lackey: yes
- Michelle Rodriguez: yes
- Bonta: yes
- Ransom: yes
- Garcia: yes
- Ávila Farías: yes
- Hoover: yes
- Schultz: yes
- Chen: yes
- Flora: yes
- Irwin: yes
- Valencia: yes
- Patel: yes
- Ta: yes
- Wilson: yes
- Connolly: yes
- Boerner: yes
- Aguiar-Curry: yes
- DeMaio: yes
Do pass as amended, and be ordered to the Consent Calendar
2025-06-17 · pass · 12-0
Member-level votes (13)
- Caballero: yes
- Umberg: yes
- Wahab: yes
- Niello: yes
- Durazo: yes
- Weber Pierson: yes
- Wiener: yes
- Allen: yes
- Valladares: yes
- Arreguín: yes
- Laird: yes
- Stern: yes
- Ashby: other
3rd Reading AB391 Michelle Rodriguez By Caballero
2025-09-02 · pass · 40-0
Member-level votes (40)
- Alvarado-Gil: yes
- Cortese: yes
- Pérez: yes
- Strickland: yes
- Wiener: yes
- Caballero: yes
- Smallwood-Cuevas: yes
- Ochoa Bogh: yes
- Hurtado: yes
- Reyes: yes
- Rubio: yes
- Seyarto: yes
- Arreguín: yes
- Wahab: yes
- Durazo: yes
- Padilla: yes
- Laird: yes
- McGuire: yes
- Menjivar: yes
- Jones: yes
- Umberg: yes
- Archuleta: yes
- Choi: yes
- Gonzalez: yes
- Weber Pierson: yes
- Cervantes: yes
- Blakespear: yes
- Becker: yes
- Ashby: yes
- Dahle: yes
- Niello: yes
- Richardson: yes
- Grove: yes
- Allen: yes
- McNerney: yes
- Stern: yes
- Grayson: yes
- Valladares: yes
- Limón: yes
- Cabaldon: yes
AB 391 Michelle Rodriguez Concurrence in Senate Amendments
2025-09-03 · pass · 79-0
Member-level votes (79)
- Pacheco: yes
- Flora: yes
- Schultz: yes
- Patterson: yes
- Ellis: yes
- Gabriel: yes
- Valencia: yes
- Petrie-Norris: yes
- Caloza: yes
- Gipson: yes
- Bauer-Kahan: yes
- Lee: yes
- Muratsuchi: yes
- Alanis: yes
- Elhawary: yes
- Zbur: yes
- Schiavo: yes
- Michelle Rodriguez: yes
- Macedo: yes
- Kalra: yes
- Rivas: yes
- Ortega: yes
- Berman: yes
- Davies: yes
- Connolly: yes
- Bains: yes
- Nguyen: yes
- Arambula: yes
- Garcia: yes
- Krell: yes
- Chen: yes
- Wilson: yes
- Mark González: yes
- Carrillo: yes
- Hadwick: yes
- Stefani: yes
- Blanca Rubio: yes
- Wicks: yes
- Gallagher: yes
- Jackson: yes
- Jeff Gonzalez: yes
- Ramos: yes
- Wallis: yes
- Alvarez: yes
- Addis: yes
- Ransom: yes
- Haney: yes
- Harabedian: yes
- Irwin: yes
- Solache: yes
- DeMaio: yes
- McKinnor: yes
- Patel: yes
- Quirk-Silva: yes
- Aguiar-Curry: yes
- Bennett: yes
- Hart: yes
- Castillo: yes
- Ward: yes
- Rogers: yes
- Ahrens: yes
- Dixon: yes
- Bryan: yes
- Sanchez: yes
- Calderon: yes
- Sharp-Collins: yes
- Lowenthal: yes
- Ávila Farías: yes
- Soria: yes
- Boerner: yes
- Pellerin: yes
- Ta: yes
- Hoover: yes
- Papan: yes
- Tangipa: yes
- Celeste Rodriguez: yes
- Lackey: yes
- Bonta: yes
- Fong: yes
Related bills
No related bills recorded for this bill.
Official source
Attribution
Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T01:34:27.960412Z
Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:
Session-wide evidence can include changes to other bills:
Use this data
Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=CA&identifier=AB 391. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.
Known limitations
- Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
- Committee referrals are not yet captured.
- Some documents have no extracted text yet, so version comparison may be limited.
See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.