Bill Commons

CA AB 390

enacted

Vehicles: highway safety.

California · 2025-2026 Regular Session · lower

Quick answers

Did CA AB 390 pass?

Yes. CA AB 390 has been enacted into law as of 2025-07-28. Latest recorded action (2025-07-28): Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 58, Statutes of 2025.

What is CA AB 390 about?

Existing law requires a driver approaching, among others, a stationary marked Caltrans vehicle that is displaying flashing lights to approach with due caution and either change lanes to a lane not immediately adjacent to the vehicle, or, if unable to safely do so, slow to a reasonable and prudent speed, as specified. Existing law makes a violation of that provision an infraction, punishable by a fine of not more than $50. This bill would expand that requirement to apply to all marked highway maintenance vehicles, as defined, and would also make that requirement applicable to any other stationary vehicle displaying flashing hazard lights or another warning device, including, but not limited to, cones, flares, or retroreflective devices. By expanding the scope of a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Who sponsors CA AB 390?

Wilson is the primary sponsor of CA AB 390, joined by 13 cosponsors.

Description

Existing law requires a driver approaching, among others, a stationary marked Caltrans vehicle that is displaying flashing lights to approach with due caution and either change lanes to a lane not immediately adjacent to the vehicle, or, if unable to safely do so, slow to a reasonable and prudent speed, as specified. Existing law makes a violation of that provision an infraction, punishable by a fine of not more than $50. This bill would expand that requirement to apply to all marked highway maintenance vehicles, as defined, and would also make that requirement applicable to any other stationary vehicle displaying flashing hazard lights or another warning device, including, but not limited to, cones, flares, or retroreflective devices. By expanding the scope of a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Introduced
2025-03-11
Latest action
2025-07-28 — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 58, Statutes of 2025.
Bill type
bill
Last updated

Subjects

Sponsors

  • Wilsonauthor
  • Ahrenscoauthor
  • Alaniscoauthor
  • Bontacoauthor
  • Calozacoauthor
  • Haneycoauthor
  • Lackeycoauthor
  • McKinnorcoauthor
  • Petrie-Norriscoauthor
  • Ransomcoauthor
  • Solachecoauthor
  • Soriacoauthor
  • Archuletacoauthor
  • Niellocoauthor

Committees

Not provided by source.

Action timeline

  1. 2025-02-03

    Read first time. To print.

    reading-1

  2. 2025-02-04

    From printer. May be heard in committee March 6.

  3. 2025-02-18

    Referred to Com. on TRANS.

    referral-committee

  4. 2025-03-11

    From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on TRANS. Read second time and amended.

    amendment-introduction,amendment-passage,committee-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee

  5. 2025-03-12

    Re-referred to Com. on TRANS.

    referral-committee

  6. 2025-03-25

    From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (March 24). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

    committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable,referral-committee

  7. 2025-04-09

    From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 14. Noes 0.) (April 9).

    committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable

  8. 2025-04-10

    Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

    reading-1,reading-2,reading-3

  9. 2025-04-28

    Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 74. Noes 0. Page 1313.)

    passage,reading-1,reading-3

  10. 2025-04-29

    In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

    reading-1,referral-committee

  11. 2025-05-07

    Referred to Com. on TRANS.

    referral-committee

  12. 2025-05-20

    From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on TRANS.

    amendment-introduction,amendment-passage,committee-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee

  13. 2025-06-10

    From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 13. Noes 0.) (June 10). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

    committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable,referral-committee

  14. 2025-06-19

    In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.

  15. 2025-06-30

    From committee: Be ordered to second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and ordered to Consent Calendar.

    committee-passage,reading-1,reading-2

  16. 2025-07-01

    Read second time. Ordered to Consent Calendar.

    reading-1,reading-2

  17. 2025-07-03

    Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 35. Noes 0. Page 1932.).

    passage,reading-1,reading-3

  18. 2025-07-03

    In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.

  19. 2025-07-10

    Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 73. Noes 0. Page 2503.).

    amendment-passage,committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable

  20. 2025-07-15

    Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3:30 p.m.

    executive-receipt

  21. 2025-07-28

    Approved by the Governor.

    executive-signature

  22. 2025-07-28

    Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 58, Statutes of 2025.

    became-law

Versions

  • 02/03/25 - Introduced — 2025-02-03Compare
  • 03/11/25 - Amended Assembly — 2025-03-11Compare
  • 05/20/25 - Amended Senate — 2025-05-20Compare
  • 07/11/25 - Enrolled — 2025-07-11Compare
  • 07/28/25 - Chaptered — 2025-07-28Compare
  • AB390Compare
  • (document, no version)Compare

Documents

Votes

  • Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]

    2025-03-24 · pass · 16-0

    Member-level votes (16)
    • Tangipa: yes
    • Ward: yes
    • Ahrens: yes
    • Wilson: yes
    • Carrillo: yes
    • Lackey: yes
    • Lowenthal: yes
    • Rogers: yes
    • Davies: yes
    • Ransom: yes
    • Jackson: yes
    • Aguiar-Curry: yes
    • Papan: yes
    • Hadwick: yes
    • Harabedian: yes
    • Hart: yes
  • Do pass.

    2025-04-09 · pass · 14-0

    Member-level votes (15)
    • Sanchez: yes
    • Mark González: yes
    • Pacheco: yes
    • Dixon: yes
    • Solache: yes
    • Hart: yes
    • Wicks: yes
    • Arambula: yes
    • Fong: yes
    • Hadwick: yes
    • Calderon: yes
    • Ta: yes
    • Elhawary: yes
    • Caloza: yes
    • Pellerin: other
  • AB 390 Wilson Assembly Third Reading

    2025-04-28 · pass · 74-0

    Member-level votes (79)
    • Michelle Rodriguez: yes
    • Ward: yes
    • Patel: yes
    • Valencia: yes
    • Ransom: yes
    • Macedo: yes
    • Wicks: yes
    • Dixon: yes
    • Hoover: yes
    • Addis: yes
    • Boerner: yes
    • Hadwick: yes
    • Garcia: yes
    • Ta: yes
    • Lackey: yes
    • Tangipa: yes
    • Bonta: yes
    • Carrillo: yes
    • McKinnor: yes
    • Zbur: yes
    • Alanis: yes
    • Muratsuchi: yes
    • Jackson: yes
    • Gabriel: yes
    • Petrie-Norris: yes
    • Schultz: yes
    • Ortega: yes
    • Aguiar-Curry: yes
    • Arambula: yes
    • Celeste Rodriguez: yes
    • Harabedian: yes
    • Gallagher: yes
    • Quirk-Silva: yes
    • Rogers: yes
    • Wallis: yes
    • Fong: yes
    • Nguyen: yes
    • Ahrens: yes
    • Davies: yes
    • Blanca Rubio: yes
    • DeMaio: yes
    • Elhawary: yes
    • Calderon: yes
    • Mark González: yes
    • Patterson: yes
    • Lowenthal: yes
    • Pacheco: yes
    • Schiavo: yes
    • Jeff Gonzalez: yes
    • Kalra: yes
    • Solache: yes
    • Soria: yes
    • Wilson: yes
    • Alvarez: yes
    • Irwin: yes
    • Haney: yes
    • Hart: yes
    • Rivas: yes
    • Castillo: yes
    • Ramos: yes
    • Sharp-Collins: yes
    • Stefani: yes
    • Lee: yes
    • Pellerin: yes
    • Ávila Farías: yes
    • Bains: yes
    • Bauer-Kahan: yes
    • Caloza: yes
    • Bryan: yes
    • Berman: yes
    • Chen: yes
    • Ellis: yes
    • Connolly: yes
    • Papan: yes
    • Sanchez: other
    • Flora: other
    • Bennett: other
    • Krell: other
    • Gipson: other
  • Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations] with the recommendation: To Consent Calendar

    2025-06-10 · pass · 13-0

    Member-level votes (15)
    • Arreguín: yes
    • Grayson: yes
    • Limón: yes
    • Richardson: yes
    • Seyarto: yes
    • Strickland: yes
    • Cervantes: yes
    • Blakespear: yes
    • Cortese: yes
    • Dahle: yes
    • Valladares: yes
    • Menjivar: yes
    • Umberg: yes
    • Archuleta: other
    • Gonzalez: other
  • Consent Calendar 2nd AB390 Wilson et al.

    2025-07-03 · pass · 35-0

    Member-level votes (40)
    • Blakespear: yes
    • Archuleta: yes
    • McGuire: yes
    • Becker: yes
    • Cortese: yes
    • Cervantes: yes
    • Caballero: yes
    • Niello: yes
    • Allen: yes
    • Ashby: yes
    • Weber Pierson: yes
    • Grayson: yes
    • Choi: yes
    • Cabaldon: yes
    • Laird: yes
    • Valladares: yes
    • Strickland: yes
    • McNerney: yes
    • Wahab: yes
    • Richardson: yes
    • Smallwood-Cuevas: yes
    • Padilla: yes
    • Gonzalez: yes
    • Jones: yes
    • Alvarado-Gil: yes
    • Arreguín: yes
    • Durazo: yes
    • Pérez: yes
    • Menjivar: yes
    • Hurtado: yes
    • Limón: yes
    • Rubio: yes
    • Umberg: yes
    • Wiener: yes
    • Stern: yes
    • Grove: other
    • Ochoa Bogh: other
    • Reyes: other
    • Dahle: other
    • Seyarto: other
  • AB 390 Wilson Concurrence in Senate Amendments

    2025-07-10 · pass · 73-0

    Member-level votes (79)
    • Tangipa: yes
    • Solache: yes
    • Macedo: yes
    • Ellis: yes
    • Bennett: yes
    • Aguiar-Curry: yes
    • Bonta: yes
    • Lee: yes
    • Hoover: yes
    • Gallagher: yes
    • Schiavo: yes
    • Addis: yes
    • Pacheco: yes
    • McKinnor: yes
    • Papan: yes
    • Ransom: yes
    • Michelle Rodriguez: yes
    • Quirk-Silva: yes
    • Hadwick: yes
    • Wallis: yes
    • Wilson: yes
    • Patel: yes
    • Lowenthal: yes
    • Bains: yes
    • Ortega: yes
    • Sharp-Collins: yes
    • Jeff Gonzalez: yes
    • Boerner: yes
    • Nguyen: yes
    • Ahrens: yes
    • Petrie-Norris: yes
    • DeMaio: yes
    • Elhawary: yes
    • Sanchez: yes
    • Harabedian: yes
    • Lackey: yes
    • Celeste Rodriguez: yes
    • Blanca Rubio: yes
    • Arambula: yes
    • Gabriel: yes
    • Davies: yes
    • Alvarez: yes
    • Bryan: yes
    • Schultz: yes
    • Ávila Farías: yes
    • Gipson: yes
    • Castillo: yes
    • Garcia: yes
    • Haney: yes
    • Irwin: yes
    • Jackson: yes
    • Kalra: yes
    • Krell: yes
    • Calderon: yes
    • Ramos: yes
    • Rogers: yes
    • Zbur: yes
    • Connolly: yes
    • Hart: yes
    • Muratsuchi: yes
    • Dixon: yes
    • Pellerin: yes
    • Soria: yes
    • Ward: yes
    • Ta: yes
    • Stefani: yes
    • Mark González: yes
    • Patterson: yes
    • Valencia: yes
    • Chen: yes
    • Berman: yes
    • Wicks: yes
    • Fong: yes
    • Caloza: other
    • Flora: other
    • Alanis: other
    • Bauer-Kahan: other
    • Carrillo: other
    • Rivas: other

Related bills

No related bills recorded for this bill.

Official source

Attribution

Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T01:34:27.960412Z

Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:

Use this data

Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=CA&identifier=AB 390. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.

Known limitations

  • Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
  • Committee referrals are not yet captured.
  • Some documents have no extracted text yet, so version comparison may be limited.

See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.