Bill Commons

CA AB 359

enacted

Fair Political Practices Commission.

California · 2025-2026 Regular Session · lower

Quick answers

Did CA AB 359 pass?

Yes. CA AB 359 has been enacted into law as of 2025-10-03. Latest recorded action (2025-10-03): Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 257, Statutes of 2025.

What is CA AB 359 about?

The Political Reform Act of 1974 permits the Fair Political Practices Commission, upon mutual agreement between the commission and the governing body of a local government agency, to assume primary responsibility for the administration, implementation, and enforcement of a local campaign finance or government ethics law passed by the local government agency. The act authorizes the commission with respect to the local campaign finance or government ethics law to, among other things, provide advice, investigate possible violations, and bring civil actions. If such an agreement is executed, the act further requires the commission to report to the Legislature on or before January 1, 2025 with specified information, including legislative recommendations, regarding the performance of the agreement. Existing law repeals these provisions on January 1, 2026. The act authorizes the commission to enter into a similar agreement with the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Bernardino. This bill would additionally authorize the commission to conduct audits with respect to the local campaign finance or government ethics law. The bill would delete the requirement for the commission to report to the Legislature and remove the January 1, 2026 repeal date, thereby indefinitely extending the operation of the provisions described above. The bill would repeal the provisions pertaining to the County of San Bernardino. The Political Reform Act of 1974, an initiative measure, provides that the Legislature may amend the act to further the act's purposes upon a 23 vote of each house of the Legislature and compliance with specified procedural requirements. This bill would declare that it furthers the purposes of the act.

Who sponsors CA AB 359?

Ramos is the primary sponsor of CA AB 359.

Description

The Political Reform Act of 1974 permits the Fair Political Practices Commission, upon mutual agreement between the commission and the governing body of a local government agency, to assume primary responsibility for the administration, implementation, and enforcement of a local campaign finance or government ethics law passed by the local government agency. The act authorizes the commission with respect to the local campaign finance or government ethics law to, among other things, provide advice, investigate possible violations, and bring civil actions. If such an agreement is executed, the act further requires the commission to report to the Legislature on or before January 1, 2025 with specified information, including legislative recommendations, regarding the performance of the agreement. Existing law repeals these provisions on January 1, 2026. The act authorizes the commission to enter into a similar agreement with the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Bernardino. This bill would additionally authorize the commission to conduct audits with respect to the local campaign finance or government ethics law. The bill would delete the requirement for the commission to report to the Legislature and remove the January 1, 2026 repeal date, thereby indefinitely extending the operation of the provisions described above. The bill would repeal the provisions pertaining to the County of San Bernardino. The Political Reform Act of 1974, an initiative measure, provides that the Legislature may amend the act to further the act's purposes upon a 23 vote of each house of the Legislature and compliance with specified procedural requirements. This bill would declare that it furthers the purposes of the act.

Introduced
2025-07-01
Latest action
2025-10-03 — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 257, Statutes of 2025.
Bill type
bill
Last updated

Subjects

Sponsors

  • Ramosauthor

Committees

Not provided by source.

Action timeline

  1. 2025-01-30

    Read first time. To print.

    reading-1

  2. 2025-01-31

    From printer. May be heard in committee March 2.

  3. 2025-02-18

    Referred to Com. on ELECTIONS.

    referral-committee

  4. 2025-03-26

    From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (March 26). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

    committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable,referral-committee

  5. 2025-04-09

    In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.

    referral-committee

  6. 2025-05-23

    From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 14. Noes 0.) (May 23).

    committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable

  7. 2025-05-27

    Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

    reading-1,reading-2,reading-3

  8. 2025-06-02

    Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 79. Noes 0. Page 1820.)

    passage,reading-1,reading-3

  9. 2025-06-03

    In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

    reading-1,referral-committee

  10. 2025-06-11

    Referred to Com. on E. & C.A.

    referral-committee

  11. 2025-07-01

    From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (July 1).

    amendment-introduction,amendment-passage,committee-passage,referral-committee

  12. 2025-07-02

    Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

    amendment-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee

  13. 2025-07-14

    From committee: Be ordered to second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and ordered to Consent Calendar.

    committee-passage,reading-1,reading-2

  14. 2025-07-15

    Read second time. Ordered to Consent Calendar.

    reading-1,reading-2

  15. 2025-07-17

    Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 35. Noes 0. Page 2137.).

    passage,reading-1,reading-3

  16. 2025-07-17

    In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.

  17. 2025-08-25

    Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 76. Noes 0. Page 2722.).

    amendment-passage,committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable

  18. 2025-09-02

    Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3 p.m.

    executive-receipt

  19. 2025-10-03

    Approved by the Governor.

    executive-signature

  20. 2025-10-03

    Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 257, Statutes of 2025.

    became-law

Versions

  • 01/30/25 - Introduced — 2025-01-30Compare
  • 07/02/25 - Amended Senate — 2025-07-02Compare
  • 08/27/25 - Enrolled — 2025-08-27Compare
  • 10/03/25 - Chaptered — 2025-10-03Compare
  • AB359Compare
  • (document, no version)Compare

Documents

Votes

  • Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations] with recommendation: To Consent Calendar

    2025-03-26 · pass · 7-0

    Member-level votes (7)
    • Stefani: yes
    • Berman: yes
    • Tangipa: yes
    • Macedo: yes
    • Bennett: yes
    • Pellerin: yes
    • Solache: yes
  • Do pass.

    2025-05-23 · pass · 14-0

    Member-level votes (15)
    • Calderon: yes
    • Elhawary: yes
    • Dixon: yes
    • Hart: yes
    • Mark González: yes
    • Arambula: yes
    • Pacheco: yes
    • Solache: yes
    • Ta: yes
    • Caloza: yes
    • Wicks: yes
    • Pellerin: yes
    • Fong: yes
    • Tangipa: yes
    • Sanchez: other
  • AB 359 Ramos Assembly Third Reading

    2025-06-02 · pass · 79-0

    Member-level votes (79)
    • Rivas: yes
    • Rogers: yes
    • Wicks: yes
    • Irwin: yes
    • Arambula: yes
    • Caloza: yes
    • Ward: yes
    • Nguyen: yes
    • Patel: yes
    • Solache: yes
    • Chen: yes
    • Bonta: yes
    • McKinnor: yes
    • Pacheco: yes
    • DeMaio: yes
    • Celeste Rodriguez: yes
    • Castillo: yes
    • Sanchez: yes
    • Schultz: yes
    • Hadwick: yes
    • Lee: yes
    • Bryan: yes
    • Michelle Rodriguez: yes
    • Mark González: yes
    • Patterson: yes
    • Carrillo: yes
    • Muratsuchi: yes
    • Papan: yes
    • Jeff Gonzalez: yes
    • Ransom: yes
    • Wallis: yes
    • Elhawary: yes
    • Davies: yes
    • Macedo: yes
    • Sharp-Collins: yes
    • Berman: yes
    • Jackson: yes
    • Wilson: yes
    • Lackey: yes
    • Bennett: yes
    • Petrie-Norris: yes
    • Harabedian: yes
    • Ellis: yes
    • Aguiar-Curry: yes
    • Connolly: yes
    • Quirk-Silva: yes
    • Soria: yes
    • Tangipa: yes
    • Gipson: yes
    • Alvarez: yes
    • Hoover: yes
    • Ta: yes
    • Zbur: yes
    • Flora: yes
    • Valencia: yes
    • Addis: yes
    • Garcia: yes
    • Gallagher: yes
    • Krell: yes
    • Ahrens: yes
    • Stefani: yes
    • Calderon: yes
    • Blanca Rubio: yes
    • Lowenthal: yes
    • Schiavo: yes
    • Gabriel: yes
    • Dixon: yes
    • Ávila Farías: yes
    • Fong: yes
    • Ramos: yes
    • Pellerin: yes
    • Kalra: yes
    • Alanis: yes
    • Haney: yes
    • Hart: yes
    • Boerner: yes
    • Bauer-Kahan: yes
    • Ortega: yes
    • Bains: yes
  • Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to the Committee on [Appropriations] with the recommendation: To Consent Calendar

    2025-07-01 · pass · 5-0

    Member-level votes (5)
    • Allen: yes
    • Umberg: yes
    • Cervantes: yes
    • Limón: yes
    • Choi: yes
  • Consent Calendar 2nd

    2025-07-17 · pass · 35-0

    Member-level votes (40)
    • Ochoa Bogh: yes
    • Limón: yes
    • Smallwood-Cuevas: yes
    • Archuleta: yes
    • Pérez: yes
    • Dahle: yes
    • Laird: yes
    • Strickland: yes
    • Menjivar: yes
    • Wiener: yes
    • Gonzalez: yes
    • Ashby: yes
    • Cervantes: yes
    • Durazo: yes
    • Arreguín: yes
    • Cortese: yes
    • Wahab: yes
    • Caballero: yes
    • Niello: yes
    • Stern: yes
    • Blakespear: yes
    • Choi: yes
    • Richardson: yes
    • Weber Pierson: yes
    • McNerney: yes
    • Seyarto: yes
    • Jones: yes
    • Valladares: yes
    • Rubio: yes
    • Allen: yes
    • Grove: yes
    • McGuire: yes
    • Hurtado: yes
    • Cabaldon: yes
    • Grayson: yes
    • Umberg: other
    • Becker: other
    • Padilla: other
    • Reyes: other
    • Alvarado-Gil: other
  • AB 359 Ramos Concurrence in Senate Amendments

    2025-08-25 · pass · 76-0

    Member-level votes (79)
    • Alvarez: yes
    • Hart: yes
    • Macedo: yes
    • Muratsuchi: yes
    • Gabriel: yes
    • Hoover: yes
    • Patel: yes
    • Stefani: yes
    • Bauer-Kahan: yes
    • Blanca Rubio: yes
    • Quirk-Silva: yes
    • Ortega: yes
    • Flora: yes
    • Carrillo: yes
    • Gallagher: yes
    • Garcia: yes
    • Wallis: yes
    • Chen: yes
    • Calderon: yes
    • Schiavo: yes
    • Caloza: yes
    • Ávila Farías: yes
    • Valencia: yes
    • Hadwick: yes
    • Michelle Rodriguez: yes
    • Lee: yes
    • Lackey: yes
    • Soria: yes
    • Gipson: yes
    • Ward: yes
    • Rogers: yes
    • Alanis: yes
    • DeMaio: yes
    • Solache: yes
    • Dixon: yes
    • Ellis: yes
    • Haney: yes
    • McKinnor: yes
    • Sanchez: yes
    • Krell: yes
    • Addis: yes
    • Aguiar-Curry: yes
    • Kalra: yes
    • Papan: yes
    • Petrie-Norris: yes
    • Mark González: yes
    • Berman: yes
    • Boerner: yes
    • Ahrens: yes
    • Lowenthal: yes
    • Castillo: yes
    • Elhawary: yes
    • Pacheco: yes
    • Wilson: yes
    • Ramos: yes
    • Bennett: yes
    • Tangipa: yes
    • Wicks: yes
    • Fong: yes
    • Bryan: yes
    • Connolly: yes
    • Patterson: yes
    • Ransom: yes
    • Celeste Rodriguez: yes
    • Rivas: yes
    • Davies: yes
    • Jackson: yes
    • Ta: yes
    • Zbur: yes
    • Pellerin: yes
    • Irwin: yes
    • Sharp-Collins: yes
    • Harabedian: yes
    • Nguyen: yes
    • Schultz: yes
    • Jeff Gonzalez: yes
    • Arambula: other
    • Bonta: other
    • Bains: other

Related bills

No related bills recorded for this bill.

Official source

Attribution

Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T01:34:27.960412Z

Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:

Use this data

Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=CA&identifier=AB 359. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.

Known limitations

  • Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
  • Committee referrals are not yet captured.
  • Some documents have no extracted text yet, so version comparison may be limited.

See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.