CA AB 334

introduced

Operators of toll facilities: interoperability programs: vehicle information.

California · 2025-2026 Regular Session · lower

Description

Existing law requires the Department of Transportation, in cooperation with the Golden Gate Bridge, Highway and Transportation District and all known entities planning to implement a toll facility, to develop and adopt functional specifications and standards for an automatic vehicle identification system in compliance with specified objectives, and generally requires any automatic vehicle identification system purchased or installed after January 1, 1991, to comply with those specifications and standards. Existing law authorizes operators of toll facilities on federal-aid highways engaged in an interoperability program to provide, regarding a vehicle's use of the toll facility, only the license plate number, transponder identification number, date and time of the transaction, and identity of the agency operating the toll facility. This bill would instead authorize an operator of a toll facility on federal-aid highways engaged in an interstate interoperability program to provide to an out-of-state toll agency or interstate interoperability tolling hub only the information regarding a vehicle's use of the toll facility that is license plate data, transponder data, or transaction data, and that is listed as "required" by specified national interoperability specifications. If the operator needs to collect other types of information to implement interstate interoperability, the bill would prohibit the operator from selling or otherwise providing that information to any other person or entity, as specified. If the operator transmits those other types of information to an out-of-state toll agency or any interstate interoperability tolling hub, the bill would subject the operator to an action by the affected person for no less than $2,500 per violation, as specified. The bill would require a transportation agency that participates in interstate interoperability to post those national interoperability specifications data types on their internet website. The bill would repeal these provisions relating to an interstate interoperability program.

Introduced: 2025-05-08
Status date: —
Latest action: 2025-09-13 — Ordered to inactive file at the request of Senator Grayson.
Bill type: bill
Last updated: —

Subjects

Committees

Not provided by source.

Action timeline

2025-01-28
Read first time. To print.
reading-1
2025-01-29
From printer. May be heard in committee February 28.
2025-02-10
Referred to Coms. on TRANS. and P. & C.P.
referral-committee
2025-03-25
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on P. & C.P. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (March 24). Re-referred to Com. on P. & C.P.
committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable,referral-committee
2025-05-08
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 14. Noes 0.) (May 6).
amendment-introduction,amendment-passage,committee-passage
2025-05-12
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
amendment-passage,reading-1,reading-2
2025-05-13
Read second time. Ordered to Consent Calendar.
reading-1,reading-2
2025-05-19
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 74. Noes 0. Page 1612.)
passage,reading-1,reading-3
2025-05-20
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
reading-1,referral-committee
2025-05-28
Referred to Coms. on TRANS. and JUD.
referral-committee
2025-06-25
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 13. Noes 0.) (June 24). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable,referral-committee
2025-06-27
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on JUD.
amendment-introduction,amendment-passage,committee-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee
2025-07-07
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
2025-07-16
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 13. Noes 0.) (July 15).
amendment-introduction,amendment-passage,committee-passage
2025-07-17
Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.
amendment-passage,reading-1,reading-2,reading-3
2025-09-13
Ordered to inactive file at the request of Senator Grayson.

Versions

01/28/25 - Introduced — 2025-01-28Compare
05/12/25 - Amended Assembly — 2025-05-12Compare
06/27/25 - Amended Senate — 2025-06-27Compare
07/17/25 - Amended Senate — 2025-07-17Compare
AB334Compare
(document, no version)Compare

Documents

Votes

Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Privacy and Consumer Protection] with recommendation: To Consent Calendar
2025-03-24 · pass · 16-0
Member-level votes (16)
- Tangipa: yes
- Ward: yes
- Ahrens: yes
- Wilson: yes
- Carrillo: yes
- Lackey: yes
- Lowenthal: yes
- Rogers: yes
- Davies: yes
- Ransom: yes
- Jackson: yes
- Aguiar-Curry: yes
- Papan: yes
- Hadwick: yes
- Harabedian: yes
- Hart: yes
Do pass as amended. To Consent Calendar.
2025-05-06 · pass · 14-0
Member-level votes (15)
- Macedo: yes
- Petrie-Norris: yes
- McKinnor: yes
- Patterson: yes
- Irwin: yes
- Lowenthal: yes
- Ward: yes
- Wilson: yes
- Bauer-Kahan: yes
- DeMaio: yes
- Pellerin: yes
- Bryan: yes
- Dixon: yes
- Ortega: yes
- Wicks: other
AB 334 Petrie-Norris Consent Calendar Second Day
2025-05-20 · pass · 74-0
Member-level votes (79)
- Solache: yes
- Zbur: yes
- Fong: yes
- Kalra: yes
- Michelle Rodriguez: yes
- Ransom: yes
- Rivas: yes
- Ramos: yes
- Lee: yes
- Muratsuchi: yes
- Pellerin: yes
- Wilson: yes
- Ortega: yes
- Schultz: yes
- Soria: yes
- Boerner: yes
- Wicks: yes
- Sharp-Collins: yes
- Haney: yes
- Gabriel: yes
- Nguyen: yes
- Pacheco: yes
- Harabedian: yes
- Wallis: yes
- Bennett: yes
- Bonta: yes
- Addis: yes
- Gallagher: yes
- Krell: yes
- Arambula: yes
- Ward: yes
- Mark González: yes
- Quirk-Silva: yes
- Sanchez: yes
- Lowenthal: yes
- Celeste Rodriguez: yes
- Ahrens: yes
- Jackson: yes
- Lackey: yes
- Bauer-Kahan: yes
- Hart: yes
- Patterson: yes
- Valencia: yes
- Ta: yes
- Berman: yes
- Bains: yes
- Garcia: yes
- Aguiar-Curry: yes
- Alvarez: yes
- Connolly: yes
- Gipson: yes
- Macedo: yes
- Bryan: yes
- Stefani: yes
- Hoover: yes
- Schiavo: yes
- Tangipa: yes
- Chen: yes
- DeMaio: yes
- Rogers: yes
- Blanca Rubio: yes
- Ellis: yes
- McKinnor: yes
- Elhawary: yes
- Castillo: yes
- Carrillo: yes
- Hadwick: yes
- Patel: yes
- Alanis: yes
- Calderon: yes
- Irwin: yes
- Davies: yes
- Petrie-Norris: yes
- Ávila Farías: yes
- Caloza: other
- Papan: other
- Dixon: other
- Flora: other
- Jeff Gonzalez: other
Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Judiciary]
2025-06-24 · pass · 13-0
Member-level votes (15)
- Dahle: yes
- Archuleta: yes
- Gonzalez: yes
- Menjivar: yes
- Strickland: yes
- Umberg: yes
- Blakespear: yes
- Richardson: yes
- Seyarto: yes
- Cortese: yes
- Arreguín: yes
- Limón: yes
- Grayson: yes
- Valladares: other
- Cervantes: other
Do pass as amended
2025-07-15 · pass · 13-0
Member-level votes (13)
- Caballero: yes
- Niello: yes
- Ashby: yes
- Wahab: yes
- Laird: yes
- Umberg: yes
- Weber Pierson: yes
- Wiener: yes
- Stern: yes
- Valladares: yes
- Allen: yes
- Arreguín: yes
- Durazo: yes

Related bills

No related bills recorded for this bill.

Official source

http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260AB334

Attribution

Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T01:34:27.960412Z

Use this data

Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=CA&identifier=AB 334. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.

Known limitations

Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
Committee referrals are not yet captured.

See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.