CA AB 329
deadCalifornia Healthy Youth Act: adoption.
California · 2025-2026 Regular Session · lower
Quick answers
Did CA AB 329 pass?
No. CA AB 329 did not pass — it was defeated or died in the legislative process (2025-05-13). Latest recorded action (2025-05-13): From committee: Without further action pursuant to Joint Rule 62(a).
What is CA AB 329 about?
Existing law, the California Healthy Youth Act, requires school districts, charter schools, county boards of education, county superintendents of schools, the California School for the Deaf, and the California School for the Blind to ensure that all pupils in grades 7 to 12, inclusive, receive comprehensive sexual health education and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) prevention education, as specified. The act requires that instruction to include, among other things, information about the effectiveness and safety of all federal Food and Drug Administration (FDA) -approved contraceptive methods in preventing pregnancy, including, but not limited to, emergency contraception, and requires instruction on pregnancy to include an objective discussion of all legally available pregnancy outcomes, including, but not limited to, parenting, adoption, and abortion. This bill would require the discussion of adoption to include a comprehensive explanation of, and information on, the types of adoption, the rights of a placing birth parent, and specific local adoption resources and support. By imposing additional duties on local educational agencies, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Who sponsors CA AB 329?
Castillo is the primary sponsor of CA AB 329.
Description
Existing law, the California Healthy Youth Act, requires school districts, charter schools, county boards of education, county superintendents of schools, the California School for the Deaf, and the California School for the Blind to ensure that all pupils in grades 7 to 12, inclusive, receive comprehensive sexual health education and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) prevention education, as specified. The act requires that instruction to include, among other things, information about the effectiveness and safety of all federal Food and Drug Administration (FDA) -approved contraceptive methods in preventing pregnancy, including, but not limited to, emergency contraception, and requires instruction on pregnancy to include an objective discussion of all legally available pregnancy outcomes, including, but not limited to, parenting, adoption, and abortion. This bill would require the discussion of adoption to include a comprehensive explanation of, and information on, the types of adoption, the rights of a placing birth parent, and specific local adoption resources and support. By imposing additional duties on local educational agencies, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
- Introduced
- —
- Latest action
- 2025-05-13 — From committee: Without further action pursuant to Joint Rule 62(a).
- Bill type
- bill
- Last updated
- —
Subjects
Sponsors
- Castilloauthor
Committees
Not provided by source.
Action timeline
2025-01-27
Read first time. To print.
reading-1
2025-01-28
From printer. May be heard in committee February 27.
2025-02-10
Referred to Coms. on ED. and JUD.
referral-committee
2025-02-27
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
2025-03-20
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
2025-04-09
In committee: Set, second hearing. Failed passage.
committee-passage-unfavorable
2025-05-13
From committee: Without further action pursuant to Joint Rule 62(a).
committee-passage,failure
Versions
Documents
- application/pdf
- text/html
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
Votes
Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Judiciary]
2025-04-09 · fail · 2-7
Member-level votes (9)
- Castillo: yes
- Hoover: yes
- Bonta: no
- Garcia: no
- Lowenthal: no
- Muratsuchi: no
- Patel: no
- Addis: no
- Alvarez: no
Related bills
No related bills recorded for this bill.
Official source
Attribution
Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T01:34:27.960412Z
Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:
Use this data
Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=CA&identifier=AB 329. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.
Known limitations
- Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
- Committee referrals are not yet captured.
- Some documents have no extracted text yet, so version comparison may be limited.
See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.