Bill Commons

CA AB 281

dead

Comprehensive sexual health education and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) prevention education: outside consultants.

California · 2025-2026 Regular Session · lower

Follow this bill’s action updates (Atom)

Subscribe in a feed reader. The feed covers recorded actions from the last 30 days; Bill Commons may record an action after it happened at the legislature.

Quick answers

Did CA AB 281 pass?

No. CA AB 281 did not pass — it was defeated or died in the legislative process. Latest recorded action (2026-02-02): Died on third reading file.

What is CA AB 281 about?

The California Healthy Youth Act requires school districts, defined to include county boards of education, county superintendents of schools, the California School for the Deaf, the California School for the Blind, and charter schools, to ensure that all pupils in grades 7 to 12, inclusive, receive comprehensive sexual health education and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) prevention education, as specified. The act authorizes a school district to provide that education earlier than grade 7 with age-appropriate and medically accurate information. The act authorizes a school district to provide sexual health education and HIV prevention to be taught by an outside consultant, and to hold an assembly to deliver that education by guest speakers. Under the act, if a school district exercises that authorization, the school district is required to provide notice of the date of instruction, name of the organization or affiliation of each guest speaker, and information stating the right of the parent or guardian to request a copy of various laws, as specified. This bill would require a school district, if it elects to provide sexual health education or HIV prevention education to be taught by outside consultants, to also provide notice of the name of the organization or affiliation of the outside consultants.

Who sponsors CA AB 281?

Gallagher is the primary sponsor of CA AB 281.

Description

The California Healthy Youth Act requires school districts, defined to include county boards of education, county superintendents of schools, the California School for the Deaf, the California School for the Blind, and charter schools, to ensure that all pupils in grades 7 to 12, inclusive, receive comprehensive sexual health education and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) prevention education, as specified. The act authorizes a school district to provide that education earlier than grade 7 with age-appropriate and medically accurate information. The act authorizes a school district to provide sexual health education and HIV prevention to be taught by an outside consultant, and to hold an assembly to deliver that education by guest speakers. Under the act, if a school district exercises that authorization, the school district is required to provide notice of the date of instruction, name of the organization or affiliation of each guest speaker, and information stating the right of the parent or guardian to request a copy of various laws, as specified. This bill would require a school district, if it elects to provide sexual health education or HIV prevention education to be taught by outside consultants, to also provide notice of the name of the organization or affiliation of the outside consultants.

Introduced
2025-03-17
Latest action
2026-02-02 — Died on third reading file.
Bill type
bill
Last updated
—

Subjects

Sponsors

  • Gallagherauthor

Committees

Not provided by source.

Action timeline

Newest first

  1. 2026-02-02

    Died on third reading file.

    failure,reading-1

  2. 2026-01-26

    Ordered to third reading.

    reading-1,reading-3

  3. 2026-01-26

    From inactive file.

  4. 2026-01-22

    Notice of intention to remove from inactive file given by Assembly Member Gallagher.

  5. 2025-06-12

    Ordered to inactive file at the request of Assembly Member Gallagher.

  6. 2025-04-21

    Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

    reading-1,reading-2,reading-3

  7. 2025-04-10

    From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 3.) (April 9).

    committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable

  8. 2025-03-26

    In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.

  9. 2025-03-18

    Re-referred to Com. on ED.

    referral-committee

  10. 2025-03-17

    From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on ED. Read second time and amended.

    amendment-introduction,amendment-passage,committee-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee

  11. 2025-03-12

    In committee: Set, first hearing. Failed passage. Reconsideration granted.

    committee-passage-unfavorable

  12. 2025-02-10

    Referred to Com. on ED.

    referral-committee

  13. 2025-01-23

    From printer. May be heard in committee February 22.

  14. 2025-01-22

    Read first time. To print.

    reading-1

Versions

Documents

Votes

  • Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]

    2025-03-12 · fail · 4-3

    Member-level votes (9)
    • Alvarez: yes
    • Castillo: yes
    • Lowenthal: yes
    • Hoover: yes
    • Muratsuchi: no
    • Bonta: no
    • Patel: no
    • Garcia: other
    • Addis: other
  • Do pass.

    2025-04-09 · pass · 5-3

    Member-level votes (9)
    • Castillo: yes
    • Lowenthal: yes
    • Addis: yes
    • Hoover: yes
    • Alvarez: yes
    • Patel: no
    • Muratsuchi: no
    • Garcia: no
    • Bonta: other

Related bills

No related bills recorded for this bill.

Official source

Attribution

Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T01:34:27.960412Z

Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:

Session-wide evidence can include changes to other bills:

Use this data

Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=CA&identifier=AB 281. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.

Known limitations

  • Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
  • Committee referrals are not yet captured.
  • Some documents have no extracted text yet, so version comparison may be limited.

See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.