Bill Commons

CA AB 2702

in committee

Residential Care Facilities for the Elderly on Faith-Based Lands Act of 2026.

California · 2025-2026 Regular Session · lower

Follow this bill’s action updates (Atom)

Subscribe in a feed reader. The feed covers recorded actions from the last 30 days; Bill Commons may record an action after it happened at the legislature.

Quick answers

Did CA AB 2702 pass?

Not yet. CA AB 2702 is in committee and has not come to a final vote. Latest recorded action (2026-04-10): In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

What is CA AB 2702 about?

The Planning and Zoning Law requires each city, county, or city and county to adopt a comprehensive, long-term general plan for its physical development, and the development of certain lands outside its boundaries, that includes, among other mandatory elements, a housing element. That law allows a development proponent to submit an application for a development that is subject to a specified streamlined, ministerial approval process not subject to a conditional use permit, if the development satisfies certain objective planning standards. Existing law, the Affordable Housing on Faith and Higher Education Lands Act of 2023, until January 1, 2036, requires that a housing development project be a use by right, as defined, and does not require a conditional use permit, planned unit development permit, or other discretionary local government review, notwithstanding any inconsistent provision of a local government's general plan, specific plan, zoning ordinance, or regulation, upon the request of an applicant who submits an application for streamlined approval, if, among other criteria, the development is located on land owned on or before January 1, 2024, by an independent institution of higher education or a religious institution, as specified. This bill would enact the Residential Care Facilities for the Elderly on Faith-Based Lands Act of 2026. The bill would require, notwithstanding any inconsistent provision of a local government's general plan, specific plan, zoning ordinance, or regulation, that a residential care facility development project located on land owned by a religious institution be an allowable use at certain densities, if the development project satisfies all of the prescribed criteria, as provided. The bill would define "residential care facility" to mean a facility licensed under a specified provision of law that provides 24-hour nonmedical care for persons who are elderly, adults, or children, including, but not limited to, a residential care facility for the elderly, as defined. This bill would specify that a development for a residential care facility that is eligible for approval as an allowable use under the bill is also eligible for a density bonus, incentives, or concessions, or waivers or reductions of development and parking standards, except as specified. The bill would require a development subject to these provisions to provide off-street parking of up to one space per unit, unless a state law or local ordinance provides for a lower standard of parking, in which case the law or ordinance applies. The bill would prohibit a local government from imposing any parking requirement on a development subject to these provisions if the development is located within one-half mile walking distance of public transit, either a high-quality transit corridor or a major transit stop, as those terms are defined, or it is within one block of a car share vehicle. This bill would repeal its provisions as of January 1, 2037. The bill would include findings that changes proposed by this bill address a matter of statewide concern rather than a municipal affair and, therefore, apply to all cities, including charter cities. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Who sponsors CA AB 2702?

Flora is the primary sponsor of CA AB 2702.

Description

The Planning and Zoning Law requires each city, county, or city and county to adopt a comprehensive, long-term general plan for its physical development, and the development of certain lands outside its boundaries, that includes, among other mandatory elements, a housing element. That law allows a development proponent to submit an application for a development that is subject to a specified streamlined, ministerial approval process not subject to a conditional use permit, if the development satisfies certain objective planning standards. Existing law, the Affordable Housing on Faith and Higher Education Lands Act of 2023, until January 1, 2036, requires that a housing development project be a use by right, as defined, and does not require a conditional use permit, planned unit development permit, or other discretionary local government review, notwithstanding any inconsistent provision of a local government's general plan, specific plan, zoning ordinance, or regulation, upon the request of an applicant who submits an application for streamlined approval, if, among other criteria, the development is located on land owned on or before January 1, 2024, by an independent institution of higher education or a religious institution, as specified. This bill would enact the Residential Care Facilities for the Elderly on Faith-Based Lands Act of 2026. The bill would require, notwithstanding any inconsistent provision of a local government's general plan, specific plan, zoning ordinance, or regulation, that a residential care facility development project located on land owned by a religious institution be an allowable use at certain densities, if the development project satisfies all of the prescribed criteria, as provided. The bill would define "residential care facility" to mean a facility licensed under a specified provision of law that provides 24-hour nonmedical care for persons who are elderly, adults, or children, including, but not limited to, a residential care facility for the elderly, as defined. This bill would specify that a development for a residential care facility that is eligible for approval as an allowable use under the bill is also eligible for a density bonus, incentives, or concessions, or waivers or reductions of development and parking standards, except as specified. The bill would require a development subject to these provisions to provide off-street parking of up to one space per unit, unless a state law or local ordinance provides for a lower standard of parking, in which case the law or ordinance applies. The bill would prohibit a local government from imposing any parking requirement on a development subject to these provisions if the development is located within one-half mile walking distance of public transit, either a high-quality transit corridor or a major transit stop, as those terms are defined, or it is within one block of a car share vehicle. This bill would repeal its provisions as of January 1, 2037. The bill would include findings that changes proposed by this bill address a matter of statewide concern rather than a municipal affair and, therefore, apply to all cities, including charter cities. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Introduced
2026-03-19
Latest action
2026-04-10 — In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
Bill type
bill
Last updated
—

Subjects

Sponsors

  • Floraauthor

Committees

Not provided by source.

Action timeline

Newest first

  1. 2026-04-10

    In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

  2. 2026-03-23

    Re-referred to Com. on H. & C.D.

    referral-committee

  3. 2026-03-19

    Referred to Coms. on H. & C.D. and AGING & L.T.C.

    referral-committee

  4. 2026-03-19

    From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on H. & C.D. Read second time and amended.

    amendment-introduction,amendment-passage,committee-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee

  5. 2026-02-21

    From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.

  6. 2026-02-20

    Read first time. To print.

    reading-1

Versions

  • 02/20/26 - Introduced — 2026-02-20Compare
  • 03/19/26 - Amended Assembly — 2026-03-19Compare
  • AB2702Compare

Documents

Votes

Not provided by source.

Related bills

No related bills recorded for this bill.

Official source

Attribution

Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T01:34:27.960412Z

Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:

Session-wide evidence can include changes to other bills:

Use this data

Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=CA&identifier=AB 2702. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.

Known limitations

  • Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
  • Committee referrals are not yet captured.

See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.