Bill Commons

CA AB 235

dead

Pupils: use of smartphones.

California · 2025-2026 Regular Session · lower

Quick answers

Did CA AB 235 pass?

No. CA AB 235 did not pass — it was defeated or died in the legislative process (2026-02-02). Latest recorded action (2026-02-02): From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.

What is CA AB 235 about?

Existing law requires the governing board of a school district, a county board of education, or the governing body of a charter school, by July 1, 2026, to develop and adopt, and update every 5 years, a policy to limit or prohibit the use by its pupils of smartphones while the pupils are at a schoolsite or while the pupils are under the supervision and control of an employee or employees of that school district, county office of education, or charter school, as provided. This bill would expressly authorize the above-described policy to limit or prohibit the use of smartphones to include, but not be limited to, a scheduled-based restriction policy, as defined, or a full-day restriction policy, as defined.

Who sponsors CA AB 235?

Arambula is the primary sponsor of CA AB 235.

Description

Existing law requires the governing board of a school district, a county board of education, or the governing body of a charter school, by July 1, 2026, to develop and adopt, and update every 5 years, a policy to limit or prohibit the use by its pupils of smartphones while the pupils are at a schoolsite or while the pupils are under the supervision and control of an employee or employees of that school district, county office of education, or charter school, as provided. This bill would expressly authorize the above-described policy to limit or prohibit the use of smartphones to include, but not be limited to, a scheduled-based restriction policy, as defined, or a full-day restriction policy, as defined.

Introduced
2025-03-17
Latest action
2026-02-02 — From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
Bill type
bill
Last updated

Subjects

Sponsors

  • Arambulaauthor

Committees

Not provided by source.

Action timeline

  1. 2025-01-13

    Read first time. To print.

    reading-1

  2. 2025-01-14

    From printer. May be heard in committee February 13.

  3. 2025-03-17

    Referred to Com. on ED.

    referral-committee

  4. 2025-03-17

    From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on ED. Read second time and amended.

    amendment-introduction,amendment-passage,committee-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee

  5. 2025-03-18

    Re-referred to Com. on ED.

    referral-committee

  6. 2025-04-10

    From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 1.) (April 9).

    amendment-introduction,amendment-passage,committee-passage,referral-committee

  7. 2025-04-21

    Read second time and amended.

    amendment-passage,reading-1,reading-2

  8. 2025-04-22

    Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

    referral-committee

  9. 2025-04-30

    In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.

  10. 2025-05-14

    In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.

  11. 2026-01-31

    Died pursuant to Art. IV, Sec. 10(c) of the Constitution.

    failure

  12. 2026-02-02

    From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.

    committee-passage,failure

Versions

  • 01/13/25 - Introduced — 2025-01-13Compare
  • 03/17/25 - Amended Assembly — 2025-03-17Compare
  • 04/21/25 - Amended Assembly — 2025-04-21Compare
  • AB235Compare
  • (document, no version)Compare

Documents

Votes

  • Do pass as amended and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]

    2025-04-09 · pass · 7-1

    Member-level votes (9)
    • Bonta: yes
    • Garcia: yes
    • Lowenthal: yes
    • Muratsuchi: yes
    • Patel: yes
    • Addis: yes
    • Alvarez: yes
    • Castillo: no
    • Hoover: other

Related bills

No related bills recorded for this bill.

Official source

Attribution

Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T01:34:27.960412Z

Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:

Use this data

Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=CA&identifier=AB 235. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.

Known limitations

  • Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
  • Committee referrals are not yet captured.
  • Some documents have no extracted text yet, so version comparison may be limited.

See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.