CA AB 1757
in committeeEnergy: nuclear facilities.
California · 2025-2026 Regular Session · lower
Subscribe in a feed reader. The feed covers recorded actions from the last 30 days; Bill Commons may record an action after it happened at the legislature.
Quick answers
Did CA AB 1757 pass?
Not yet. CA AB 1757 is in committee and has not come to a final vote. Latest recorded action (2026-04-06): In committee: Set, first hearing. Failed passage. Reconsideration granted.
What is CA AB 1757 about?
Existing law prohibits the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission from certifying a nuclear fission thermal powerplant, except for specified powerplants, and provides that a nuclear fission thermal powerplant, except specified powerplants, is not a permitted land use in California unless certain conditions are met regarding the existence of technology for the construction and operation of nuclear fuel rod processing plants and of demonstrated technology or means for the disposal of high-level nuclear waste, as specified. This bill would exempt a nuclear microreactor, as defined, from those provisions.
Who sponsors CA AB 1757?
Gallagher is the primary sponsor of CA AB 1757, joined by 5 cosponsors.
Description
Existing law prohibits the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission from certifying a nuclear fission thermal powerplant, except for specified powerplants, and provides that a nuclear fission thermal powerplant, except specified powerplants, is not a permitted land use in California unless certain conditions are met regarding the existence of technology for the construction and operation of nuclear fuel rod processing plants and of demonstrated technology or means for the disposal of high-level nuclear waste, as specified. This bill would exempt a nuclear microreactor, as defined, from those provisions.
- Introduced
- 2026-03-16
- Latest action
- 2026-04-06 — In committee: Set, first hearing. Failed passage. Reconsideration granted.
- Bill type
- bill
- Last updated
- —
Subjects
Sponsors
- Gallagherauthor
- Alaniscoauthor
- Elliscoauthor
- Hadwickcoauthor
- Hoovercoauthor
- Macedocoauthor
Committees
Not provided by source.
Action timeline
Newest first
2026-04-06
In committee: Set, first hearing. Failed passage. Reconsideration granted.
committee-passage-unfavorable
2026-03-17
Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
referral-committee
2026-03-16
Referred to Coms. on NAT. RES. and U. & E.
referral-committee
2026-03-16
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on NAT. RES. Read second time and amended.
amendment-introduction,amendment-passage,committee-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee
2026-02-10
From printer. May be heard in committee March 12.
2026-02-09
Read first time. To print.
reading-1
Versions
Documents
- application/pdf
- application/pdf
- text/html
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
Votes
Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]
2026-04-06 · fail · 4-9
Member-level votes (14)
- Ellis: yes
- Alanis: yes
- Hoover: yes
- Macedo: yes
- Connolly: no
- Pellerin: no
- Garcia: no
- Bryan: no
- Zbur: no
- Schultz: no
- Wicks: no
- Kalra: no
- Boerner: no
- Haney: other
Related bills
No related bills recorded for this bill.
Official source
Attribution
Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T01:34:27.960412Z
Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:
Session-wide evidence can include changes to other bills:
Use this data
Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=CA&identifier=AB 1757. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.
Known limitations
- Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
- Committee referrals are not yet captured.
- Some documents have no extracted text yet, so version comparison may be limited.
See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.