Bill Commons

CA AB 1742

in committee

Civil actions: service of summons: commercial buildings.

California · 2025-2026 Regular Session · lower

Follow this bill’s action updates (Atom)

Subscribe in a feed reader. The feed covers recorded actions from the last 30 days; Bill Commons may record an action after it happened at the legislature.

Quick answers

Did CA AB 1742 pass?

Not yet. CA AB 1742 is in committee and has not come to a final vote. Latest recorded action (2026-03-19): In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.

What is CA AB 1742 about?

Existing law prescribes specified methods for the service of a summons in a civil action. Existing law provides that if a copy of the summons and complaint cannot with reasonable diligence be personally delivered to the person to be served, the summons may be served by leaving a copy at the person's dwelling house, usual place of abode, usual place of business, or usual mailing address, in the presence of a person who is at least 18 years of age, and by thereafter mailing a copy of the summons and complaint, as specified. This method of service is known as substituted service. This bill would authorize substituted service of process on a tenant or occupant of a commercial building, as defined, wherein access to the tenant spaces is controlled by security personnel, concierge staff, or similar agents, if the person attempting service is refused entry or is otherwise prevented from making a direct attempt at personal service. Under this bill, service of process would be deemed effective by leaving a copy of the documents to be served with security personnel, concierge staff, or similar agents of the commercial building. The bill would deem service in such a manner to constitute substituted service on the tenant or occupant of the commercial building. The bill would deem service completed on the date and at the time of service, if specified conditions are met. Under this bill, a proof of service would require a declaration setting forth specified information, such as the date, time, and place of service, and the identity or description of the person controlling access with whom the documents were deposited, and facts showing that the person appeared to be at least 18 years of age and in charge of the central access point of the commercial building. These provisions would not apply when an alternative authorized method of service is chosen by the serving party and would not apply to individuals, as defined.

Who sponsors CA AB 1742?

Chen is the primary sponsor of CA AB 1742.

Description

Existing law prescribes specified methods for the service of a summons in a civil action. Existing law provides that if a copy of the summons and complaint cannot with reasonable diligence be personally delivered to the person to be served, the summons may be served by leaving a copy at the person's dwelling house, usual place of abode, usual place of business, or usual mailing address, in the presence of a person who is at least 18 years of age, and by thereafter mailing a copy of the summons and complaint, as specified. This method of service is known as substituted service. This bill would authorize substituted service of process on a tenant or occupant of a commercial building, as defined, wherein access to the tenant spaces is controlled by security personnel, concierge staff, or similar agents, if the person attempting service is refused entry or is otherwise prevented from making a direct attempt at personal service. Under this bill, service of process would be deemed effective by leaving a copy of the documents to be served with security personnel, concierge staff, or similar agents of the commercial building. The bill would deem service in such a manner to constitute substituted service on the tenant or occupant of the commercial building. The bill would deem service completed on the date and at the time of service, if specified conditions are met. Under this bill, a proof of service would require a declaration setting forth specified information, such as the date, time, and place of service, and the identity or description of the person controlling access with whom the documents were deposited, and facts showing that the person appeared to be at least 18 years of age and in charge of the central access point of the commercial building. These provisions would not apply when an alternative authorized method of service is chosen by the serving party and would not apply to individuals, as defined.

Introduced
—
Latest action
2026-03-19 — In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
Bill type
bill
Last updated
—

Subjects

Sponsors

  • Chenauthor

Committees

Not provided by source.

Action timeline

Newest first

  1. 2026-03-19

    In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.

  2. 2026-03-04

    In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.

  3. 2026-02-23

    Referred to Com. on JUD.

    referral-committee

  4. 2026-02-06

    From printer. May be heard in committee March 8.

  5. 2026-02-05

    Read first time. To print.

    reading-1

Versions

Documents

Votes

Not provided by source.

Related bills

No related bills recorded for this bill.

Official source

Attribution

Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T01:34:27.960412Z

Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:

Session-wide evidence can include changes to other bills:

Use this data

Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=CA&identifier=AB 1742. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.

Known limitations

  • Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
  • Committee referrals are not yet captured.

See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.