CA AB 162
withdrawnElections.
California · 2025-2026 Regular Session · lower
Quick answers
Did CA AB 162 pass?
No. CA AB 162 was withdrawn on 2025-09-13 and is no longer under consideration. Latest recorded action (2025-09-13): Ordered to inactive file at the request of Senator Grayson.
What is CA AB 162 about?
A special election will be held throughout the state on November 4, 2025. Existing law authorizes consolidation of a local election for the submission of any question, proposition, or office to be filled, which was called by a district, city, or other political subdivision on or before August 8, 2025, and scheduled to be held on November 4, 2025, with the statewide special election. Existing law prohibits a county elections official from certifying the results of the statewide special election before the 28th calendar day following the election. This bill would also prohibit a county elections official from certifying the results of a local election called by a district, city, or other political subdivision on or before August 8, 2025, and scheduled to be held on November 4, 2025, before the 28th calendar day following the election. Existing law requires the Secretary of State to report on the final costs of the statewide special election to the Director of Finance and the Joint Legislative Budget Committee no later than April 1, 2026. This bill would appropriate $100,000 from the General Fund to the Secretary of State for purposes of that report. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as a bill providing for appropriations related to the Budget Bill.
Who sponsors CA AB 162?
Committee on Budget is the primary sponsor of CA AB 162.
Description
A special election will be held throughout the state on November 4, 2025. Existing law authorizes consolidation of a local election for the submission of any question, proposition, or office to be filled, which was called by a district, city, or other political subdivision on or before August 8, 2025, and scheduled to be held on November 4, 2025, with the statewide special election. Existing law prohibits a county elections official from certifying the results of the statewide special election before the 28th calendar day following the election. This bill would also prohibit a county elections official from certifying the results of a local election called by a district, city, or other political subdivision on or before August 8, 2025, and scheduled to be held on November 4, 2025, before the 28th calendar day following the election. Existing law requires the Secretary of State to report on the final costs of the statewide special election to the Director of Finance and the Joint Legislative Budget Committee no later than April 1, 2026. This bill would appropriate $100,000 from the General Fund to the Secretary of State for purposes of that report. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as a bill providing for appropriations related to the Budget Bill.
- Introduced
- 2025-09-08
- Latest action
- 2025-09-13 — Ordered to inactive file at the request of Senator Grayson.
- Bill type
- bill,appropriation
- Last updated
- —
Subjects
Sponsors
- Committee on Budgetauthor
Committees
Not provided by source.
Action timeline
2025-01-08
Read first time. To print.
reading-1
2025-01-09
From printer. May be heard in committee February 8.
2025-02-03
Referred to Com. on BUDGET.
referral-committee
2025-03-17
Withdrawn from committee.
withdrawal
2025-03-17
Ordered to second reading.
reading-1,reading-2
2025-03-17
(Ayes 53. Noes 17. Page 643.)
2025-03-18
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
reading-1,reading-2,reading-3
2025-03-20
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 53. Noes 17. Page 744.)
passage,reading-1,reading-3
2025-03-20
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
reading-1,referral-committee
2025-04-02
Referred to Com. on B. & F. R.
referral-committee
2025-09-08
Senate Rule 29.3(b) suspended. (Ayes 28. Noes 8. Page 2568.)
2025-09-08
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on B. & F. R.
amendment-introduction,amendment-passage,committee-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee
2025-09-10
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 13. Noes 0.) (September 10).
committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable
2025-09-11
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
reading-1,reading-2,reading-3
2025-09-13
Ordered to inactive file at the request of Senator Grayson.
Versions
Documents
- application/pdf
- application/pdf
- text/html
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
Votes
AB 162 Gabriel Assembly Third Reading
2025-03-20 · pass · 53-17
Member-level votes (80)
- Gipson: yes
- Ward: yes
- Bryan: yes
- Lee: yes
- Patel: yes
- Garcia: yes
- Schiavo: yes
- Bonta: yes
- Sharp-Collins: yes
- Rogers: yes
- Haney: yes
- Stefani: yes
- Rivas: yes
- Arambula: yes
- Ransom: yes
- Bennett: yes
- Elhawary: yes
- Solache: yes
- Petrie-Norris: yes
- Blanca Rubio: yes
- Celeste Rodriguez: yes
- Harabedian: yes
- Mark González: yes
- Quirk-Silva: yes
- Wilson: yes
- Carrillo: yes
- Pellerin: yes
- Jackson: yes
- Fong: yes
- Nguyen: yes
- Valencia: yes
- Ortega: yes
- Addis: yes
- Wicks: yes
- Schultz: yes
- Ávila Farías: yes
- Bains: yes
- Connolly: yes
- Boerner: yes
- Gabriel: yes
- Michelle Rodriguez: yes
- Muratsuchi: yes
- McKinnor: yes
- Ramos: yes
- Zbur: yes
- Hart: yes
- Aguiar-Curry: yes
- Lowenthal: yes
- Caloza: yes
- Pacheco: yes
- Berman: yes
- Soria: yes
- Kalra: yes
- Hadwick: no
- Flora: no
- DeMaio: no
- Macedo: no
- Alanis: no
- Ellis: no
- Jeff Gonzalez: no
- Castillo: no
- Sanchez: no
- Ta: no
- Gallagher: no
- Chen: no
- Dixon: no
- Tangipa: no
- Lackey: no
- Davies: no
- Patterson: no
- Calderon: other
- Hoover: other
- Ahrens: other
- Bauer-Kahan: other
- Papan: other
- Wallis: other
- Essayli: other
- Irwin: other
- Alvarez: other
- Krell: other
Do pass
2025-09-10 · pass · 13-0
Member-level votes (18)
- McNerney: yes
- Richardson: yes
- Allen: yes
- Pérez: yes
- Wahab: yes
- Wiener: yes
- Menjivar: yes
- Weber Pierson: yes
- Cabaldon: yes
- Smallwood-Cuevas: yes
- Blakespear: yes
- Durazo: yes
- Laird: yes
- Ochoa Bogh: other
- Niello: other
- Grove: other
- Seyarto: other
- Choi: other
Related bills
No related bills recorded for this bill.
Official source
Attribution
Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T01:34:27.960412Z
Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:
Use this data
Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=CA&identifier=AB 162. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.
Known limitations
- Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
- Committee referrals are not yet captured.
- Some documents have no extracted text yet, so version comparison may be limited.
See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.