Bill Commons

CA AB 1429

dead

Behavioral health reimbursement.

California · 2025-2026 Regular Session · lower

Follow this bill’s action updates (Atom)

Subscribe in a feed reader. The feed covers recorded actions from the last 30 days; Bill Commons may record an action after it happened at the legislature.

Quick answers

Did CA AB 1429 pass?

No. CA AB 1429 did not pass — it was defeated or died in the legislative process. Latest recorded action (2026-02-02): From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.

What is CA AB 1429 about?

Existing law, the Knox-Keene Health Care Service Plan Act of 1975, provides for the licensure and regulation of health care service plans by the Department of Managed Health Care, and makes a willful violation of the act a crime. Existing law requires a health care service plan contract issued, amended, or renewed on or after January 1, 2021, to provide coverage for medically necessary treatment of mental health and substance use disorders, as defined, under the same terms and conditions applied to other medical conditions. This bill would require the plan, as defined, to fully reimburse an enrollee who incurs out-of-pocket costs for behavioral health care services obtained from nonplan providers or facilities or mental health prescription medication obtained from a nonplan pharmacy or nonplan provider on or after May 1, 2022, until the department certifies to the Legislature that the plan has successfully completed implementation of the corrective action work plan resulting from its 2023 settlement agreement with the department. The bill would require an enrollee to submit specified documents for reimbursement and would require the plan to pay the reimbursement within 60 calendar days of an enrollee's submission of documented expenses. If the plan fails to provide this reimbursement, the bill would require it to pay the original amount plus 10% per annum interest to the enrollee, as well as a $5,000 fine per incident. The bill would require the plan to establish specified procedures, and would require the plan to submit a monthly report to the department with specified information. Because a willful violation of the bill's provisions would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the specified plan. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Who sponsors CA AB 1429?

Bains is the primary sponsor of CA AB 1429, joined by 3 cosponsors.

Description

Existing law, the Knox-Keene Health Care Service Plan Act of 1975, provides for the licensure and regulation of health care service plans by the Department of Managed Health Care, and makes a willful violation of the act a crime. Existing law requires a health care service plan contract issued, amended, or renewed on or after January 1, 2021, to provide coverage for medically necessary treatment of mental health and substance use disorders, as defined, under the same terms and conditions applied to other medical conditions. This bill would require the plan, as defined, to fully reimburse an enrollee who incurs out-of-pocket costs for behavioral health care services obtained from nonplan providers or facilities or mental health prescription medication obtained from a nonplan pharmacy or nonplan provider on or after May 1, 2022, until the department certifies to the Legislature that the plan has successfully completed implementation of the corrective action work plan resulting from its 2023 settlement agreement with the department. The bill would require an enrollee to submit specified documents for reimbursement and would require the plan to pay the reimbursement within 60 calendar days of an enrollee's submission of documented expenses. If the plan fails to provide this reimbursement, the bill would require it to pay the original amount plus 10% per annum interest to the enrollee, as well as a $5,000 fine per incident. The bill would require the plan to establish specified procedures, and would require the plan to submit a monthly report to the department with specified information. Because a willful violation of the bill's provisions would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the specified plan. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Introduced
2025-02-21
Latest action
2026-02-02 — From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
Bill type
bill
Last updated
—

Subjects

Sponsors

  • Bainsauthor
  • Schiavocoauthor
  • Cervantescoauthor
  • Hurtadocoauthor

Committees

Not provided by source.

Action timeline

Newest first

  1. 2026-02-02

    From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.

    committee-passage,failure

  2. 2026-01-31

    Died pursuant to Art. IV, Sec. 10(c) of the Constitution.

    failure

  3. 2025-05-23

    In committee: Held under submission.

  4. 2025-05-14

    In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.

    referral-committee

  5. 2025-05-05

    Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

    referral-committee

  6. 2025-05-01

    Read second time and amended.

    amendment-passage,reading-1,reading-2

  7. 2025-04-30

    From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 12. Noes 1.) (April 29).

    amendment-introduction,amendment-passage,committee-passage,referral-committee

  8. 2025-04-21

    In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.

  9. 2025-04-03

    Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.

    referral-committee

  10. 2025-04-02

    From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on HEALTH. Read second time and amended.

    amendment-introduction,amendment-passage,committee-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee

  11. 2025-03-13

    Referred to Com. on HEALTH.

    referral-committee

  12. 2025-02-24

    Read first time.

    reading-1

  13. 2025-02-22

    From printer. May be heard in committee March 24.

  14. 2025-02-21

    Introduced. To print.

    introduction

Versions

  • 02/21/25 - Introduced — 2025-02-21Compare
  • 04/02/25 - Amended Assembly — 2025-04-02Compare
  • 05/01/25 - Amended Assembly — 2025-05-01Compare
  • AB1429Compare
  • (document, no version)Compare

Documents

Votes

  • Do pass as amended and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]

    2025-04-29 · pass · 12-1

    Member-level votes (16)
    • Celeste Rodriguez: yes
    • Mark González: yes
    • Sharp-Collins: yes
    • Schiavo: yes
    • Bonta: yes
    • Aguiar-Curry: yes
    • Stefani: yes
    • Carrillo: yes
    • Krell: yes
    • Arambula: yes
    • Patel: yes
    • Addis: yes
    • Patterson: no
    • Sanchez: other
    • Flora: other
    • Chen: other

Related bills

No related bills recorded for this bill.

Official source

Attribution

Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T01:34:27.960412Z

Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:

Session-wide evidence can include changes to other bills:

Use this data

Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=CA&identifier=AB 1429. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.

Known limitations

  • Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
  • Committee referrals are not yet captured.
  • Some documents have no extracted text yet, so version comparison may be limited.

See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.