Bill Commons

CA AB 1188

dead

Elections: statewide initiative and referendum petitions: disclosures.

California · 2025-2026 Regular Session · lower

Quick answers

Did CA AB 1188 pass?

No. CA AB 1188 did not pass — it was defeated or died in the legislative process (2026-02-02). Latest recorded action (2026-02-02): From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.

What is CA AB 1188 about?

Existing law requires the inclusion of an Official Top Funders disclosure with any petition proposing certain types of ballot measures, including a state initiative or referendum, for which the circulation is paid for by a committee, as defined. Existing law requires a petition to include a notice informing a person to sign only if it is the same month for which the Official Top Funders disclosure is applicable or if the person has seen the disclosure for that month. This bill would require a state initiative or referendum petition to also include a notice informing a person to sign only if they have reviewed the Official Top Funders disclosure. The bill would require each section of a state initiative or referendum petition to include a space for signers to check a box to confirm that they have read the Official Top Funders disclosure. Under existing law, the ballot label for a statewide measure contains a condensed version of the ballot title and summary prepared by the Attorney General, including a fiscal impact summary prepared by the Legislative Analyst, followed by a listing of the names of the measure's supporters and opponents. Existing law requires a committee primarily formed to support or oppose a state ballot measure or state candidate that raises $1,000,000 or more for an election to disclose the committee's top 10 contributors on the Fair Political Practices Commission's website, until the Secretary of State certifies a particular online filing and disclosure system, at which point the contributors would be disclosed on the Secretary of State's website. This bill would require the 3 largest contributors to all committees formed in support of a statewide initiative or referendum measure, the 3 largest contributors to all committees formed in opposition to the measure, and the address for the website identifying committees' top 10 contributors to also be printed on the ballot immediately following the names of the measure's supporters and opponents. The Secretary of State would be required to make a copy of the top contributors available for public examination prior to printing that information on ballots, and voters would be authorized to seek a writ of mandate requiring the identified contributors to be amended or deleted. The bill would apply its provisions only to proposed statewide initiative or statewide referendum measures for which the Attorney General delivers a circulating title and summary to the proponents on or after the effective date of the bill. To the extent the bill would increase the duties of county elections officials relative to examining initiative and referendum petitions and printing ballots, it would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.

Who sponsors CA AB 1188?

Ortega is the primary sponsor of CA AB 1188.

Description

Existing law requires the inclusion of an Official Top Funders disclosure with any petition proposing certain types of ballot measures, including a state initiative or referendum, for which the circulation is paid for by a committee, as defined. Existing law requires a petition to include a notice informing a person to sign only if it is the same month for which the Official Top Funders disclosure is applicable or if the person has seen the disclosure for that month. This bill would require a state initiative or referendum petition to also include a notice informing a person to sign only if they have reviewed the Official Top Funders disclosure. The bill would require each section of a state initiative or referendum petition to include a space for signers to check a box to confirm that they have read the Official Top Funders disclosure. Under existing law, the ballot label for a statewide measure contains a condensed version of the ballot title and summary prepared by the Attorney General, including a fiscal impact summary prepared by the Legislative Analyst, followed by a listing of the names of the measure's supporters and opponents. Existing law requires a committee primarily formed to support or oppose a state ballot measure or state candidate that raises $1,000,000 or more for an election to disclose the committee's top 10 contributors on the Fair Political Practices Commission's website, until the Secretary of State certifies a particular online filing and disclosure system, at which point the contributors would be disclosed on the Secretary of State's website. This bill would require the 3 largest contributors to all committees formed in support of a statewide initiative or referendum measure, the 3 largest contributors to all committees formed in opposition to the measure, and the address for the website identifying committees' top 10 contributors to also be printed on the ballot immediately following the names of the measure's supporters and opponents. The Secretary of State would be required to make a copy of the top contributors available for public examination prior to printing that information on ballots, and voters would be authorized to seek a writ of mandate requiring the identified contributors to be amended or deleted. The bill would apply its provisions only to proposed statewide initiative or statewide referendum measures for which the Attorney General delivers a circulating title and summary to the proponents on or after the effective date of the bill. To the extent the bill would increase the duties of county elections officials relative to examining initiative and referendum petitions and printing ballots, it would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.

Introduced
2025-02-21
Latest action
2026-02-02 — From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
Bill type
bill
Last updated

Subjects

Sponsors

  • Ortegaauthor

Committees

Not provided by source.

Action timeline

  1. 2025-02-21

    Introduced. To print.

    introduction

  2. 2025-02-22

    From printer. May be heard in committee March 24.

  3. 2025-02-24

    Read first time.

    reading-1

  4. 2025-03-24

    From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on ELECTIONS. Read second time and amended.

    amendment-introduction,amendment-passage,committee-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee

  5. 2025-03-24

    Referred to Com. on ELECTIONS.

    referral-committee

  6. 2025-03-25

    Re-referred to Com. on ELECTIONS.

    referral-committee

  7. 2025-05-01

    From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 1.) (April 30).

    amendment-introduction,amendment-passage,committee-passage,referral-committee

  8. 2025-05-05

    Read second time and amended.

    amendment-passage,reading-1,reading-2

  9. 2025-05-06

    Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

    referral-committee

  10. 2025-05-14

    In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.

    referral-committee

  11. 2025-05-23

    In committee: Held under submission.

  12. 2026-01-31

    Died pursuant to Art. IV, Sec. 10(c) of the Constitution.

    failure

  13. 2026-02-02

    From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.

    committee-passage,failure

Versions

  • 02/21/25 - Introduced — 2025-02-21Compare
  • 03/24/25 - Amended Assembly — 2025-03-24Compare
  • 05/05/25 - Amended Assembly — 2025-05-05Compare
  • AB1188Compare
  • (document, no version)Compare

Documents

Votes

  • Do pass as amended and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]

    2025-04-30 · pass · 4-1

    Member-level votes (7)
    • Solache: yes
    • Pellerin: yes
    • Stefani: yes
    • Berman: yes
    • Macedo: no
    • Lackey: other
    • Bennett: other

Related bills

No related bills recorded for this bill.

Official source

Attribution

Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T01:34:27.960412Z

Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:

Use this data

Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=CA&identifier=AB 1188. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.

Known limitations

  • Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
  • Committee referrals are not yet captured.
  • Some documents have no extracted text yet, so version comparison may be limited.

See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.