Bill Commons

CA AB 1109

in committee

Evidentiary privileges: union agent-represented worker privilege.

California · 2025-2026 Regular Session · lower

Description

Existing law governs the admissibility of evidence in court proceedings and generally provides a privilege as to communications made in the course of certain relations, including the attorney-client, physician-patient, and psychotherapist-patient relationship, as specified. Under existing law, the right of any person to claim those evidentiary privileges is waived with respect to a communication protected by the privilege if any holder of the privilege, without coercion, has disclosed a significant part of the communication or has consented to a disclosure. This bill would establish a privilege between a union agent, as defined, and a represented employee or represented former employee to refuse to disclose any confidential communication between the employee or former employee and the union agent made while the union agent was acting in the union agent's representative capacity, except as specified. The bill would permit a represented employee or represented former employee to prevent another person from disclosing a privileged communication, except as specified. The bill would further provide that this privilege may be waived in accordance with existing law and does not apply in criminal proceedings.

Introduced
Status date
Latest action
2025-08-29 — In committee: Held under submission.
Bill type
bill
Last updated

Subjects

Sponsors

  • Kalraauthor
  • Garciacoauthor
  • Mark Gonzálezcoauthor
  • Ortegacoauthor
  • Rogerscoauthor
  • Schiavocoauthor

Committees

Not provided by source.

Action timeline

  1. 2025-02-20

    Read first time. To print.

    reading-1

  2. 2025-02-21

    From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.

  3. 2025-03-13

    Referred to Com. on JUD.

    referral-committee

  4. 2025-04-08

    Coauthors revised.

  5. 2025-04-08

    From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (April 8).

    committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable

  6. 2025-04-09

    Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

    reading-1,reading-2,reading-3

  7. 2025-05-12

    Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 59. Noes 6. Page 1507.)

    passage,reading-1,reading-3

  8. 2025-05-13

    In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

    reading-1,referral-committee

  9. 2025-06-11

    Referred to Coms. on JUD. and APPR.

    referral-committee

  10. 2025-07-02

    From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 2.) (July 1). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

    committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable,referral-committee

  11. 2025-07-14

    In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.

    referral-committee

  12. 2025-08-29

    In committee: Held under submission.

Versions

Documents

Votes

  • Do pass.

    2025-04-08 · pass · 9-0

    Member-level votes (12)
    • Zbur: yes
    • Kalra: yes
    • Papan: yes
    • Bryan: yes
    • Pacheco: yes
    • Connolly: yes
    • Harabedian: yes
    • Wicks: yes
    • Stefani: yes
    • Dixon: other
    • Tangipa: other
    • Sanchez: other
  • AB 1109 Kalra Assembly Third Reading

    2025-05-12 · pass · 59-6

    Member-level votes (79)
    • Carrillo: yes
    • Alanis: yes
    • Hart: yes
    • Michelle Rodriguez: yes
    • Sharp-Collins: yes
    • Addis: yes
    • Ward: yes
    • Wicks: yes
    • Garcia: yes
    • Arambula: yes
    • Lowenthal: yes
    • Pacheco: yes
    • Gabriel: yes
    • Jeff Gonzalez: yes
    • Bonta: yes
    • Soria: yes
    • Alvarez: yes
    • Solache: yes
    • Harabedian: yes
    • Ahrens: yes
    • Aguiar-Curry: yes
    • Muratsuchi: yes
    • Papan: yes
    • Caloza: yes
    • Pellerin: yes
    • Calderon: yes
    • Mark González: yes
    • Valencia: yes
    • Lee: yes
    • Ramos: yes
    • Irwin: yes
    • Quirk-Silva: yes
    • Rivas: yes
    • Wilson: yes
    • Fong: yes
    • Schiavo: yes
    • Rogers: yes
    • Blanca Rubio: yes
    • McKinnor: yes
    • Haney: yes
    • Ávila Farías: yes
    • Bennett: yes
    • Ortega: yes
    • Connolly: yes
    • Berman: yes
    • Ransom: yes
    • Krell: yes
    • Bryan: yes
    • Celeste Rodriguez: yes
    • Nguyen: yes
    • Zbur: yes
    • Elhawary: yes
    • Patel: yes
    • Boerner: yes
    • Bains: yes
    • Gipson: yes
    • Jackson: yes
    • Kalra: yes
    • Schultz: yes
    • Ellis: no
    • Gallagher: no
    • Tangipa: no
    • Sanchez: no
    • Macedo: no
    • DeMaio: no
    • Bauer-Kahan: other
    • Lackey: other
    • Hoover: other
    • Flora: other
    • Wallis: other
    • Davies: other
    • Patterson: other
    • Castillo: other
    • Petrie-Norris: other
    • Stefani: other
    • Chen: other
    • Dixon: other
    • Ta: other
    • Hadwick: other
  • Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]

    2025-07-01 · pass · 10-2

    Member-level votes (13)
    • Durazo: yes
    • Wahab: yes
    • Arreguín: yes
    • Umberg: yes
    • Stern: yes
    • Weber Pierson: yes
    • Wiener: yes
    • Laird: yes
    • Allen: yes
    • Ashby: yes
    • Valladares: no
    • Niello: no
    • Caballero: other
  • Placed on suspense file

    2025-07-14 · pass · 7-0

    Member-level votes (7)
    • Cabaldon: yes
    • Wahab: yes
    • Richardson: yes
    • Dahle: yes
    • Grayson: yes
    • Caballero: yes
    • Seyarto: yes

Related bills

No related bills recorded for this bill.

Official source

Attribution

Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T01:34:27.960412Z

Use this data

Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=CA&identifier=AB 1109. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.

Known limitations

  • Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
  • Committee referrals are not yet captured.

See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.