CA AB 1109

in committee

Evidentiary privileges: union agent-represented worker privilege.

California · 2025-2026 Regular Session · lower

Quick answers

Did CA AB 1109 pass?

Not yet. CA AB 1109 is in committee as of 2025-08-29 and has not come to a final vote. Latest recorded action (2025-08-29): In committee: Held under submission.

What is CA AB 1109 about?

Existing law governs the admissibility of evidence in court proceedings and generally provides a privilege as to communications made in the course of certain relations, including the attorney-client, physician-patient, and psychotherapist-patient relationship, as specified. Under existing law, the right of any person to claim those evidentiary privileges is waived with respect to a communication protected by the privilege if any holder of the privilege, without coercion, has disclosed a significant part of the communication or has consented to a disclosure. This bill would establish a privilege between a union agent, as defined, and a represented employee or represented former employee to refuse to disclose any confidential communication between the employee or former employee and the union agent made while the union agent was acting in the union agent's representative capacity, except as specified. The bill would permit a represented employee or represented former employee to prevent another person from disclosing a privileged communication, except as specified. The bill would further provide that this privilege may be waived in accordance with existing law and does not apply in criminal proceedings.

Who sponsors CA AB 1109?

Kalra is the primary sponsor of CA AB 1109, joined by 5 cosponsors.

Description

Introduced: —
Latest action: 2025-08-29 — In committee: Held under submission.
Bill type: bill
Last updated: —

Subjects

Committees

Not provided by source.

Action timeline

2025-02-20
Read first time. To print.
reading-1
2025-02-21
From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.
2025-03-13
Referred to Com. on JUD.
referral-committee
2025-04-08
Coauthors revised.
2025-04-08
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (April 8).
committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable
2025-04-09
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
reading-1,reading-2,reading-3
2025-05-12
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 59. Noes 6. Page 1507.)
passage,reading-1,reading-3
2025-05-13
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
reading-1,referral-committee
2025-06-11
Referred to Coms. on JUD. and APPR.
referral-committee
2025-07-02
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 2.) (July 1). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable,referral-committee
2025-07-14
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
referral-committee
2025-08-29
In committee: Held under submission.

Versions

02/20/25 - Introduced — 2025-02-20Compare
AB1109Compare
(document, no version)Compare

Documents

application/pdf
text/html
application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
application/pdf(no extracted text yet)

Votes

Do pass.
2025-04-08 · pass · 9-0
Member-level votes (12)
- Zbur: yes
- Kalra: yes
- Papan: yes
- Bryan: yes
- Pacheco: yes
- Connolly: yes
- Harabedian: yes
- Wicks: yes
- Stefani: yes
- Dixon: other
- Tangipa: other
- Sanchez: other
AB 1109 Kalra Assembly Third Reading
2025-05-12 · pass · 59-6
Member-level votes (79)
- Carrillo: yes
- Alanis: yes
- Hart: yes
- Michelle Rodriguez: yes
- Sharp-Collins: yes
- Addis: yes
- Ward: yes
- Wicks: yes
- Garcia: yes
- Arambula: yes
- Lowenthal: yes
- Pacheco: yes
- Gabriel: yes
- Jeff Gonzalez: yes
- Bonta: yes
- Soria: yes
- Alvarez: yes
- Solache: yes
- Harabedian: yes
- Ahrens: yes
- Aguiar-Curry: yes
- Muratsuchi: yes
- Papan: yes
- Caloza: yes
- Pellerin: yes
- Calderon: yes
- Mark González: yes
- Valencia: yes
- Lee: yes
- Ramos: yes
- Irwin: yes
- Quirk-Silva: yes
- Rivas: yes
- Wilson: yes
- Fong: yes
- Schiavo: yes
- Rogers: yes
- Blanca Rubio: yes
- McKinnor: yes
- Haney: yes
- Ávila Farías: yes
- Bennett: yes
- Ortega: yes
- Connolly: yes
- Berman: yes
- Ransom: yes
- Krell: yes
- Bryan: yes
- Celeste Rodriguez: yes
- Nguyen: yes
- Zbur: yes
- Elhawary: yes
- Patel: yes
- Boerner: yes
- Bains: yes
- Gipson: yes
- Jackson: yes
- Kalra: yes
- Schultz: yes
- Ellis: no
- Gallagher: no
- Tangipa: no
- Sanchez: no
- Macedo: no
- DeMaio: no
- Bauer-Kahan: other
- Lackey: other
- Hoover: other
- Flora: other
- Wallis: other
- Davies: other
- Patterson: other
- Castillo: other
- Petrie-Norris: other
- Stefani: other
- Chen: other
- Dixon: other
- Ta: other
- Hadwick: other
Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations]
2025-07-01 · pass · 10-2
Member-level votes (13)
- Durazo: yes
- Wahab: yes
- Arreguín: yes
- Umberg: yes
- Stern: yes
- Weber Pierson: yes
- Wiener: yes
- Laird: yes
- Allen: yes
- Ashby: yes
- Valladares: no
- Niello: no
- Caballero: other
Placed on suspense file
2025-07-14 · pass · 7-0
Member-level votes (7)
- Cabaldon: yes
- Wahab: yes
- Richardson: yes
- Dahle: yes
- Grayson: yes
- Caballero: yes
- Seyarto: yes

Related bills

No related bills recorded for this bill.

Official source

http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260AB1109

Attribution

Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T01:34:27.960412Z

Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:

Source and document changes Status and relationship changes

Use this data

Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=CA&identifier=AB 1109. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.

Known limitations

Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
Committee referrals are not yet captured.
Some documents have no extracted text yet, so version comparison may be limited.

See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.