CA AB 1105
in committeeConservatorships.
California · 2025-2026 Regular Session · lower
Quick answers
Did CA AB 1105 pass?
Not yet. CA AB 1105 is in committee as of 2025-08-29 and has not come to a final vote. Latest recorded action (2025-08-29): In committee: Held under submission.
What is CA AB 1105 about?
Existing law, the Guardianship-Conservatorship Law, generally establishes the standards and procedures for the appointment and termination of an appointment for a guardian or conservator of a person, an estate, or both. Existing law authorizes a conservator to authorize the placement of a conservatee in a secured perimeter residential care facility for the elderly upon a court making specific findings. This bill would also authorize a conservator to authorize the placement of a conservatee in a residential facility, an intermediate care facility, or a skilled nursing facility, as defined, that has a secured perimeter, a delayed egress device, or both a secured perimeter and a delayed egress device, as specified. The bill would require court approval for a subsequent placement of a conservatee in a different facility if specific regulations have not been promulgated for the type of facility to which the conservator is seeking to move the conservatee. The bill would require the State Department of Social Services and the State Department of Public Health to update their regulations related to these provisions, including, among other things, to create regulations to protect the rights, health, and safety of residents, by January 1, 2027, and would authorize those departments to promulgate emergency regulations prior to that date.
Who sponsors CA AB 1105?
Quirk-Silva is the primary sponsor of CA AB 1105, joined by 3 cosponsors.
Description
Existing law, the Guardianship-Conservatorship Law, generally establishes the standards and procedures for the appointment and termination of an appointment for a guardian or conservator of a person, an estate, or both. Existing law authorizes a conservator to authorize the placement of a conservatee in a secured perimeter residential care facility for the elderly upon a court making specific findings. This bill would also authorize a conservator to authorize the placement of a conservatee in a residential facility, an intermediate care facility, or a skilled nursing facility, as defined, that has a secured perimeter, a delayed egress device, or both a secured perimeter and a delayed egress device, as specified. The bill would require court approval for a subsequent placement of a conservatee in a different facility if specific regulations have not been promulgated for the type of facility to which the conservator is seeking to move the conservatee. The bill would require the State Department of Social Services and the State Department of Public Health to update their regulations related to these provisions, including, among other things, to create regulations to protect the rights, health, and safety of residents, by January 1, 2027, and would authorize those departments to promulgate emergency regulations prior to that date.
- Introduced
- 2025-04-02
- Latest action
- 2025-08-29 — In committee: Held under submission.
- Bill type
- bill
- Last updated
- —
Subjects
Sponsors
- Quirk-Silvaauthor
- Alaniscoauthor
- Macedocoauthor
- Ochoa Boghcoauthor
Committees
Not provided by source.
Action timeline
2025-02-20
Read first time. To print.
reading-1
2025-02-21
From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.
2025-03-10
Referred to Com. on JUD.
referral-committee
2025-03-18
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
2025-04-02
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on JUD. Read second time and amended.
amendment-introduction,amendment-passage,committee-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee
2025-04-03
Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
referral-committee
2025-04-08
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (April 8).
committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable
2025-04-09
Read second time. Ordered to Consent Calendar.
reading-1,reading-2
2025-04-21
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 73. Noes 0. Page 1176.)
passage,reading-1,reading-3
2025-04-21
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
reading-1,referral-committee
2025-05-07
Referred to Com. on JUD.
referral-committee
2025-05-20
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on JUD.
amendment-introduction,amendment-passage,committee-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee
2025-07-02
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on RLS. (Ayes 13. Noes 0.) (July 1).
amendment-introduction,amendment-passage,committee-passage,referral-committee
2025-07-03
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
amendment-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee
2025-07-07
Re-referred to Com. on HUMAN S.
referral-committee
2025-07-08
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (July 7). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable,referral-committee
2025-08-18
In committee: Referred to suspense file.
referral-committee
2025-08-29
In committee: Held under submission.
Versions
Documents
- application/pdf
- application/pdf
- application/pdf
- application/pdf
- text/html
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
Votes
Do pass. To Consent Calendar.
2025-04-08 · pass · 12-0
Member-level votes (12)
- Dixon: yes
- Tangipa: yes
- Zbur: yes
- Kalra: yes
- Papan: yes
- Bryan: yes
- Pacheco: yes
- Connolly: yes
- Harabedian: yes
- Sanchez: yes
- Wicks: yes
- Stefani: yes
AB 1105 Quirk-Silva Consent Calendar Second Day
2025-04-21 · pass · 73-0
Member-level votes (79)
- Celeste Rodriguez: yes
- Flora: yes
- Michelle Rodriguez: yes
- Schiavo: yes
- Mark González: yes
- Aguiar-Curry: yes
- Ransom: yes
- Berman: yes
- Solache: yes
- Jackson: yes
- Carrillo: yes
- Wicks: yes
- Ellis: yes
- Arambula: yes
- Boerner: yes
- Davies: yes
- Fong: yes
- Gabriel: yes
- Bauer-Kahan: yes
- Gipson: yes
- Soria: yes
- Stefani: yes
- Kalra: yes
- Lowenthal: yes
- Haney: yes
- Hoover: yes
- Connolly: yes
- Lee: yes
- Bryan: yes
- Chen: yes
- Harabedian: yes
- Pacheco: yes
- Rivas: yes
- DeMaio: yes
- Addis: yes
- Alvarez: yes
- Rogers: yes
- Garcia: yes
- Ahrens: yes
- McKinnor: yes
- Alanis: yes
- Wallis: yes
- Macedo: yes
- Ortega: yes
- Jeff Gonzalez: yes
- Irwin: yes
- Ta: yes
- Muratsuchi: yes
- Ward: yes
- Bennett: yes
- Hart: yes
- Patel: yes
- Castillo: yes
- Patterson: yes
- Quirk-Silva: yes
- Ávila Farías: yes
- Bains: yes
- Zbur: yes
- Tangipa: yes
- Nguyen: yes
- Bonta: yes
- Dixon: yes
- Hadwick: yes
- Lackey: yes
- Elhawary: yes
- Blanca Rubio: yes
- Krell: yes
- Sanchez: yes
- Wilson: yes
- Caloza: yes
- Calderon: yes
- Petrie-Norris: yes
- Pellerin: yes
- Sharp-Collins: other
- Schultz: other
- Papan: other
- Gallagher: other
- Valencia: other
- Ramos: other
Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to the Committee on [Rules]
2025-07-01 · pass · 13-0
Member-level votes (13)
- Niello: yes
- Durazo: yes
- Wahab: yes
- Valladares: yes
- Arreguín: yes
- Umberg: yes
- Stern: yes
- Weber Pierson: yes
- Caballero: yes
- Wiener: yes
- Laird: yes
- Allen: yes
- Ashby: yes
Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations] with the recommendation: To Consent Calendar
2025-07-07 · pass · 5-0
Member-level votes (5)
- Limón: yes
- Ochoa Bogh: yes
- Arreguín: yes
- Durazo: yes
- Becker: yes
Placed on suspense file
2025-08-18 · pass · 7-0
Member-level votes (7)
- Richardson: yes
- Seyarto: yes
- Caballero: yes
- Cabaldon: yes
- Dahle: yes
- Wahab: yes
- Grayson: yes
Related bills
No related bills recorded for this bill.
Official source
Attribution
Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T01:34:27.960412Z
Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:
Use this data
Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=CA&identifier=AB 1105. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.
Known limitations
- Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
- Committee referrals are not yet captured.
- Some documents have no extracted text yet, so version comparison may be limited.
See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.