CA AB 1092
deadFirearms: concealed carry licenses.
California · 2025-2026 Regular Session · lower
Subscribe in a feed reader. The feed covers recorded actions from the last 30 days; Bill Commons may record an action after it happened at the legislature.
Quick answers
Did CA AB 1092 pass?
No. CA AB 1092 did not pass — it was defeated or died in the legislative process. Latest recorded action (2026-01-13): From committee: Without further action pursuant to Joint Rule 62(a).
What is CA AB 1092 about?
Existing law prohibits a person from carrying a concealed firearm or carrying a loaded firearm in public. Existing law requires a licensing authority to issue or renew a license to carry a firearm capable of being concealed if specified conditions are met, including, among others, that the applicant is not a disqualified person for the license, as specified, and the applicant has completed a specified course of training. Existing law makes a new or renewal license that is issued valid for a period of time not to exceed 2 years from the date of the license, except as otherwise provided. This bill would, for a license issued after January 1, 2026, and before January 1, 2027, extend the duration of those licenses to a period of time not to exceed 3 years from the date of the license. The bill would, for a license issued after January 1, 2027, extend the duration of those licenses to a period of time not to exceed 4 years from the date of the license.
Who sponsors CA AB 1092?
Castillo is the primary sponsor of CA AB 1092.
Description
Existing law prohibits a person from carrying a concealed firearm or carrying a loaded firearm in public. Existing law requires a licensing authority to issue or renew a license to carry a firearm capable of being concealed if specified conditions are met, including, among others, that the applicant is not a disqualified person for the license, as specified, and the applicant has completed a specified course of training. Existing law makes a new or renewal license that is issued valid for a period of time not to exceed 2 years from the date of the license, except as otherwise provided. This bill would, for a license issued after January 1, 2026, and before January 1, 2027, extend the duration of those licenses to a period of time not to exceed 3 years from the date of the license. The bill would, for a license issued after January 1, 2027, extend the duration of those licenses to a period of time not to exceed 4 years from the date of the license.
- Introduced
- 2025-03-13
- Latest action
- 2026-01-13 — From committee: Without further action pursuant to Joint Rule 62(a).
- Bill type
- bill
- Last updated
- —
Subjects
Sponsors
- Castilloauthor
Committees
Not provided by source.
Action timeline
Newest first
2026-01-13
In committee: Set, second hearing. Failed passage.
committee-passage-unfavorable
2026-01-13
From committee: Without further action pursuant to Joint Rule 62(a).
committee-passage,failure
2025-04-08
In committee: Reconsideration granted.
2025-04-01
In committee: Set, first hearing. Failed passage.
committee-passage-unfavorable
2025-03-17
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
referral-committee
2025-03-13
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. Read second time and amended.
amendment-introduction,amendment-passage,committee-passage,reading-1,reading-2,referral-committee
2025-03-10
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
referral-committee
2025-02-21
From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.
2025-02-20
Read first time. To print.
reading-1
Versions
Documents
- application/pdf
- application/pdf
- text/html
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
Votes
Do pass.
2025-04-01 · fail · 2-4
Member-level votes (9)
- Alanis: yes
- Lackey: yes
- Mark González: no
- Haney: no
- Schultz: no
- Sharp-Collins: no
- Harabedian: other
- Nguyen: other
- Ramos: other
Reconsideration.
2025-04-08 · pass · 7-1
Member-level votes (9)
- Sharp-Collins: yes
- Schultz: yes
- Harabedian: yes
- Nguyen: yes
- Ramos: yes
- Lackey: yes
- Alanis: yes
- Haney: no
- Mark González: other
Do pass.
2026-01-13 · fail · 2-7
Member-level votes (9)
- Alanis: yes
- Lackey: yes
- Haney: no
- Mark González: no
- Nguyen: no
- Schultz: no
- Ramos: no
- Harabedian: no
- Sharp-Collins: no
Related bills
No related bills recorded for this bill.
Official source
Attribution
Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T01:34:27.960412Z
Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:
Session-wide evidence can include changes to other bills:
Use this data
Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=CA&identifier=AB 1092. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.
Known limitations
- Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
- Committee referrals are not yet captured.
- Some documents have no extracted text yet, so version comparison may be limited.
See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.