Bill Commons

TX SB 2722

died on adjournment

Relating to the use of certain tolls and charges imposed by certain counties; authorizing a civil penalty and limiting the counties' authority to adopt an ad valorem tax rate.

Texas · 89th Legislature (2025 Regular Session) · upper

Quick answers

Did TX SB 2722 pass?

No. TX SB 2722 died when the 89th Legislature (2025 Regular Session) adjourned without final action on it. Bills that die this way are sometimes reintroduced in a later session. Latest recorded action (2025-05-22): Committee report sent to Calendars

What is TX SB 2722 about?

TX SB 2722 is a bill in the 89th Legislature (2025 Regular Session) titled “Relating to the use of certain tolls and charges imposed by certain counties; authorizing a civil penalty and limiting the counties' authority to adopt an ad valorem tax rate.”.

Who sponsors TX SB 2722?

Cunningham, Paul, DeAyala and 3 others are the primary sponsors of TX SB 2722, joined by 1 cosponsor.

Introduced
2025-03-13
Latest action
2025-05-22 — Committee report sent to Calendars
Bill type
bill
Last updated
—

Subjects

Sponsors

  • Cunninghamprimary
  • Paulprimary
  • DeAyalaprimary
  • Bettencourtprimary
  • Hullprimary
  • Jones, Jolandaprimary
  • Huffmancosponsor

Committees

Not provided by source.

Action timeline

  1. 2025-03-13

    Received by the Secretary of the Senate

    filing,introduction

  2. 2025-03-13

    Filed

    filing

  3. 2025-03-27

    Read first time

    introduction,reading-1

  4. 2025-03-27

    Referred to Transportation

    referral-committee

  5. 2025-04-09

    Scheduled for public hearing on . . .

  6. 2025-04-09

    Considered in public hearing

  7. 2025-04-09

    Testimony taken in committee

  8. 2025-04-09

    Left pending in committee

  9. 2025-04-16

    Considered in public hearing

  10. 2025-04-16

    Vote taken in committee

  11. 2025-04-22

    Reported favorably as substituted

    committee-passage-favorable

  12. 2025-04-22

    Committee report printed and distributed

  13. 2025-04-24

    Co-author authorized

  14. 2025-04-24

    Placed on intent calendar

  15. 2025-04-29

    Rules suspended-Regular order of business

  16. 2025-04-29

    Record vote

  17. 2025-04-29

    Read 2nd time

    reading-2

  18. 2025-04-29

    Amendment(s) offered

    amendment-introduction

  19. 2025-04-29

    Amended

    amendment-passage

  20. 2025-04-29

    Vote recorded in Journal

  21. 2025-04-29

    Amendment(s) offered

    amendment-introduction

  22. 2025-04-29

    Amendment fails of adoption

    amendment-failure

  23. 2025-04-29

    Record vote

  24. 2025-04-29

    Amendment(s) offered

    amendment-introduction

  25. 2025-04-29

    Amended

    amendment-passage

  26. 2025-04-29

    Vote recorded in Journal

  27. 2025-04-29

    Amendment(s) offered

    amendment-introduction

  28. 2025-04-29

    Amended

    amendment-passage

  29. 2025-04-29

    Vote recorded in Journal

  30. 2025-04-29

    Passed to engrossment as amended

    amendment-passage

  31. 2025-04-29

    Record vote

  32. 2025-04-29

    Three day rule suspended

  33. 2025-04-29

    Record vote

  34. 2025-04-29

    Read 3rd time

    reading-3

  35. 2025-04-29

    Passed

    passage

  36. 2025-04-29

    Record vote

  37. 2025-04-29

    Reported engrossed

  38. 2025-04-30

    Received from the Senate

    introduction

  39. 2025-05-01

    Read first time

    introduction,reading-1

  40. 2025-05-01

    Referred to s/c on Transportation Funding by Speaker

    referral-committee

  41. 2025-05-13

    Recalled from subcommittee

  42. 2025-05-13

    Considered in formal meeting

  43. 2025-05-13

    Committee substitute considered in committee

    substitution

  44. 2025-05-13

    Reported favorably as substituted

    committee-passage-favorable

  45. 2025-05-21

    Comte report filed with Committee Coordinator

    filing

  46. 2025-05-21

    Committee report distributed

  47. 2025-05-22

    Committee report sent to Calendars

Versions

Documents

Votes

  • passage

    2025-04-29 · pass · 22-9

    Member-level votes (31)
    • Alvarado: yes
    • Bettencourt: yes
    • Birdwell: yes
    • Campbell: yes
    • Creighton: yes
    • Flores: yes
    • Hagenbuch: yes
    • Hall: yes
    • Hancock: yes
    • A. Hinojosa: yes
    • J. Hinojosa: yes
    • Huffman: yes
    • Hughes: yes
    • King: yes
    • Kolkhorst: yes
    • Middleton: yes
    • Nichols: yes
    • Parker: yes
    • Paxton: yes
    • Perry: yes
    • Schwertner: yes
    • Sparks: yes
    • Blanco: no
    • Cook: no
    • Eckhardt: no
    • Gutierrez: no
    • Johnson: no
    • Menéndez: no
    • Miles: no
    • West: no
    • Zaffirini: no

  • other

    2025-04-29 · fail · 11-20

    Member-level votes (31)
    • Alvarado: yes
    • Blanco: yes
    • Cook: yes
    • Eckhardt: yes
    • Gutierrez: yes
    • J. Hinojosa: yes
    • Johnson: yes
    • Menéndez: yes
    • Miles: yes
    • West: yes
    • Zaffirini: yes
    • Bettencourt: no
    • Birdwell: no
    • Campbell: no
    • Creighton: no
    • Flores: no
    • Hagenbuch: no
    • Hall: no
    • Hancock: no
    • A. Hinojosa: no
    • Huffman: no
    • Hughes: no
    • King: no
    • Kolkhorst: no
    • Middleton: no
    • Nichols: no
    • Parker: no
    • Paxton: no
    • Perry: no
    • Schwertner: no
    • Sparks: no

Related bills

Official source

ftp://ftp.legis.state.tx.us/bills/89R/billhistory/senate_bills/SB02700_SB02799/SB 2722.xml

Attribution

Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T05:33:51.767464Z

Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:

Source and document changesStatus and relationship changes

Use this data

Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=TX&identifier=SB 2722. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.

Known limitations

  • Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
  • Committee referrals are not yet captured.
  • Some documents have no extracted text yet, so version comparison may be limited.

See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.