NY S 8372
in committeeRelates to expenses in matrimonial actions
New York · 2025-2026 Regular Session · upper
Description
Relates to expenses in matrimonial actions; establishes there is a rebuttable presumption that certain itemized bills or invoices shall be admissible in evidence.
- Introduced
- —
- Status date
- —
- Latest action
- 2026-04-22 — SUBSTITUTED BY A8305
- Bill type
- bill
- Last updated
- —
Sponsors
- Jabari Brisportprimary
Committees
Not provided by source.
Action timeline
2025-06-05
REFERRED TO RULES
referral-committee
2026-01-07
REFERRED TO JUDICIARY
referral-committee
2026-03-31
1ST REPORT CAL.675
2026-04-01
2ND REPORT CAL.
2026-04-07
ADVANCED TO THIRD READING
2026-04-22
SUBSTITUTED BY A8305
Versions
- S8372Compare
Documents
- application/pdf(no extracted text yet)
- text/html(no extracted text yet)
Votes
Judiciary Vote
2026-03-31 · pass · 19-0
Member-level votes (19)
- Jamaal Bailey: yes
- Erik Bottcher: yes
- Jeremy Cooney: yes
- Andrew Gounardes: yes
- John Liu: yes
- Shelley Mayer: yes
- Zellnor Myrie: yes
- Kevin S. Parker: yes
- Jessica Ramos: yes
- Luis R. Sepúlveda: yes
- James Skoufis: yes
- Toby Ann Stavisky: yes
- Jeremy Zellner: yes
- Patricia Canzoneri-Fitzpatrick: yes
- Andrew J. Lanza: yes
- Jack M. Martins: yes
- Thomas F. O'Mara: yes
- Anthony H. Palumbo: yes
- Steve Rhoads: yes
Related bills
- Companion bill: A 8305
Official source
Attribution
Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T05:28:30.722574Z
Use this data
Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=NY&identifier=S 8372. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.
Known limitations
- Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
- Committee referrals are not yet captured.
- Some documents have no extracted text yet, so version comparison may be limited.
See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.