TX SB 648
vetoedRelating to recording requirements for certain instruments concerning real property.
Texas · 89th Legislature (2025 Regular Session) · upper
Quick answers
Did TX SB 648 pass?
No. TX SB 648 passed the legislature but was vetoed on 2025-06-22. Latest recorded action (2025-06-22): Vetoed by the Governor
What is TX SB 648 about?
TX SB 648 is a bill in the 89th Legislature (2025 Regular Session) titled “Relating to recording requirements for certain instruments concerning real property.”.
Who sponsors TX SB 648?
West, Anchía, Lujan and 2 others are the primary sponsors of TX SB 648, joined by 1 cosponsor.
- Introduced
- 2024-12-18
- Latest action
- 2025-06-22 — Vetoed by the Governor
- Bill type
- bill
- Last updated
- —
Subjects
Sponsors
- Westprimary
- Anchíaprimary
- Lujanprimary
- Buttonprimary
- Longoriaprimary
- Hinojosa, Adamcosponsor
Committees
Not provided by source.
Action timeline
2024-12-18
Received by the Secretary of the Senate
filing,introduction
2024-12-18
Filed
filing
2025-02-03
Read first time
introduction,reading-1
2025-02-03
Referred to Business & Commerce
referral-committee
2025-04-10
Scheduled for public hearing on . . .
2025-04-10
Considered in public hearing
2025-04-10
Testimony taken in committee
2025-04-10
Left pending in committee
2025-04-15
Considered in public hearing
2025-04-15
Vote taken in committee
2025-04-16
Reported favorably as substituted
committee-passage-favorable
2025-04-16
Committee report printed and distributed
2025-04-24
Placed on intent calendar
2025-04-28
Co-author authorized
2025-04-28
Rules suspended-Regular order of business
2025-04-28
Record vote
2025-04-28
Read 2nd time & passed to engrossment
reading-2
2025-04-28
Record vote
2025-04-28
Three day rule suspended
2025-04-28
Record vote
2025-04-28
Read 3rd time
reading-3
2025-04-28
Passed
passage
2025-04-28
Record vote
2025-04-28
Reported engrossed
2025-04-29
Received from the Senate
introduction
2025-04-30
Read first time
introduction,reading-1
2025-04-30
Referred to Trade, Workforce & Economic Development
referral-committee
2025-05-07
Considered in public hearing
2025-05-07
Reported favorably w/o amendment(s)
committee-passage,committee-passage-favorable
2025-05-08
Considered in formal meeting
2025-05-08
Vote reconsidered in committee
2025-05-08
Committee substitute considered in committee
substitution
2025-05-08
Recommended to be sent to Local & Consent
referral-committee
2025-05-08
Reported favorably as substituted
committee-passage-favorable
2025-05-15
Comte report filed with Committee Coordinator
filing
2025-05-15
Committee report distributed
2025-05-16
Comm. report sent to Local & Consent Calendar
2025-05-19
Considered in Local & Consent Calendars
2025-05-21
Placed on Local, Consent, and Res. Calendar
2025-05-21
Read 2nd time
reading-2
2025-05-21
Passed to 3rd reading
2025-05-21
Nonrecord vote recorded in Journal
2025-05-21
Read 3rd time
reading-3
2025-05-21
Passed
passage
2025-05-21
Record vote
2025-05-21
Statement(s) of vote recorded in Journal
2025-05-21
Nonrecord vote recorded in Journal
2025-05-22
House passage as amended reported
amendment-passage
2025-05-26
House amendment(s) laid before the Senate
2025-05-26
Read
2025-05-26
Senate concurs in House amendment(s)
2025-05-26
Record vote
2025-05-26
Senate concurs in House amendment(s)-reported
2025-05-26
Reported enrolled
enrolled
2025-05-27
Signed in the Senate
passage
2025-05-28
Signed in the House
passage
2025-05-28
Sent to the Governor
executive-receipt
2025-06-22
Vetoed by the Governor
executive-veto
Versions
Documents
Votes
Senate Rule 7.18 and the Constitutional Rule requiring bills to be read on three several days be suspended and that CSSB 648 be placed on its third reading and final passage.
2025-04-28 · pass · 26-4
Member-level votes (31)
- Alvarado: yes
- Bettencourt: yes
- Birdwell: yes
- Blanco: yes
- Campbell: yes
- Cook: yes
- Eckhardt: yes
- Flores: yes
- Gutierrez: yes
- Hall: yes
- Hancock: yes
- A. Hinojosa: yes
- J. Hinojosa: yes
- Huffman: yes
- Johnson: yes
- King: yes
- Kolkhorst: yes
- Middleton: yes
- Miles: yes
- Nichols: yes
- Parker: yes
- Paxton: yes
- Perry: yes
- Schwertner: yes
- West: yes
- Zaffirini: yes
- Creighton: no
- Hagenbuch: no
- Hughes: no
- Sparks: no
- Menéndez: not voting
passage
2025-04-28 · pass · 26-4
Member-level votes (31)
- Alvarado: yes
- Bettencourt: yes
- Birdwell: yes
- Blanco: yes
- Campbell: yes
- Cook: yes
- Eckhardt: yes
- Flores: yes
- Gutierrez: yes
- Hall: yes
- Hancock: yes
- A. Hinojosa: yes
- J. Hinojosa: yes
- Huffman: yes
- Johnson: yes
- King: yes
- Kolkhorst: yes
- Middleton: yes
- Miles: yes
- Nichols: yes
- Parker: yes
- Paxton: yes
- Perry: yes
- Schwertner: yes
- West: yes
- Zaffirini: yes
- Creighton: no
- Hagenbuch: no
- Hughes: no
- Sparks: no
- Menéndez: not voting
passage
2025-05-21 · pass · 117-24
Member-level votes (24)
- Cunningham: no
- Dorazio: no
- Harrison: no
- Hickland: no
- Holt: no
- Hopper: no
- Hull: no
- LaHood: no
- Leo Wilson: no
- Little: no
- Luther: no
- Morgan: no
- Noble: no
- Olcott: no
- Patterson: no
- Pierson: no
- Richardson: no
- Schatzline: no
- Schoolcraft: no
- Shofner: no
- Slawson: no
- Spiller: no
- Toth: no
- Troxclair: no
passage
2025-05-26 · pass · 26-4
Member-level votes (31)
- Alvarado: yes
- Bettencourt: yes
- Birdwell: yes
- Blanco: yes
- Campbell: yes
- Cook: yes
- Eckhardt: yes
- Flores: yes
- Gutierrez: yes
- Hall: yes
- Hancock: yes
- A. Hinojosa: yes
- J. Hinojosa: yes
- Huffman: yes
- Johnson: yes
- King: yes
- Kolkhorst: yes
- Middleton: yes
- Miles: yes
- Nichols: yes
- Parker: yes
- Paxton: yes
- Perry: yes
- Schwertner: yes
- West: yes
- Zaffirini: yes
- Creighton: no
- Hagenbuch: no
- Hughes: no
- Sparks: no
- Menéndez: not voting
Related bills
- Companion bill: HB 4560
Official source
Attribution
Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T05:33:51.767464Z
Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:
Use this data
Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=TX&identifier=SB 648. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.
Known limitations
- Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
- Committee referrals are not yet captured.
- Some documents have no extracted text yet, so version comparison may be limited.
See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.