MD HB 1029
died on adjournmentReal Property - Termination of Residential Real Estate Contracts - Contingency Clauses
Maryland · 2026 Regular Session · lower
Subscribe in a feed reader. The feed covers recorded actions from the last 30 days; Bill Commons may record an action after it happened at the legislature.
Quick answers
Did MD HB 1029 pass?
No. MD HB 1029 died when the 2026 Regular Session adjourned without final action on it. Bills that die this way are sometimes reintroduced in a later session. Latest recorded action (2026-03-23): Referred Judicial Proceedings
What is MD HB 1029 about?
MD HB 1029 is a bill in the 2026 Regular Session titled “Real Property - Termination of Residential Real Estate Contracts - Contingency Clauses”.
Who sponsors MD HB 1029?
Woods, Wims, White Holland and 8 others are the primary sponsors of MD HB 1029.
- Introduced
- —
- Latest action
- 2026-03-23 — Referred Judicial Proceedings
- Bill type
- bill
- Last updated
- —
Sponsors
- Woodsprimary
- Wimsprimary
- White Hollandprimary
- Turnerprimary
- Tolesprimary
- Taylorprimary
- Pattersonprimary
- A. Johnsonprimary
- Harrisonprimary
- Griffithprimary
- Robertsprimary
Committees
Not provided by source.
Action timeline
Newest first
2026-03-23
Referred Judicial Proceedings
referral-committee
2026-03-21
Third Reading Passed
passage
2026-03-20
Favorable Adopted Second Reading Passed
committee-passage-favorable
2026-03-20
Favorable Report by Economic Matters
committee-passage-favorable
2026-03-03
Hearing 3/05 at 1:30 p.m.
2026-03-03
Hearing canceled
2026-02-17
Hearing 3/05 at 1:00 p.m.
2026-02-09
First Reading Economic Matters
referral-committee
Versions
Documents
Votes
On Third Reading
2026-03-09 · pass · 126-0
Member-level votes (141)
- Speaker: yes
- Davis: yes
- Kaufman: yes
- Phillips: yes
- Stinnett: yes
- Acevero: yes
- Ebersole: yes
- Kerr: yes
- Pippy: yes
- Stonko: yes
- Adams: yes
- Feldmark: yes
- Kipke: yes
- Pruski: yes
- Szeliga: yes
- Allen: yes
- Fennell: yes
- Korman: yes
- Qi: yes
- Taveras: yes
- Alston: yes
- Fisher: yes
- Lehman: yes
- Queen: yes
- Taylor: yes
- Amprey: yes
- Foley: yes
- Lewis: yes
- Reilly: yes
- Terrasa: yes
- Anderson: yes
- Forbes: yes
- Long, R.: yes
- Roberson: yes
- Toles: yes
- Arentz: yes
- Fraser-Hidalgo: yes
- Lopez: yes
- Roberts: yes
- Tomlinson: yes
- Arikan: yes
- Ghrist: yes
- Mangione: yes
- Rogers: yes
- Turner: yes
- Bagnall: yes
- Grammer: yes
- Martinez: yes
- Rose: yes
- Valderrama: yes
- Barnes: yes
- Griffith: yes
- McCaskill: yes
- Rosenberg: yes
- Valentine: yes
- Bartlett: yes
- Guyton: yes
- McComas: yes
- Ross: yes
- Vogel: yes
- Beauchamp: yes
- Guzzone: yes
- Metzgar: yes
- Ruff: yes
- Watson: yes
- Behler: yes
- Harrison: yes
- Miller: yes
- Ruth: yes
- Wells: yes
- Bhandari: yes
- Hartman: yes
- Mireku-North: yes
- Sample-Hughes: yes
- White Holland: yes
- Boyce: yes
- Healey: yes
- Moon: yes
- Schindler: yes
- Wilkins: yes
- Buckel: yes
- Hill: yes
- Moreno: yes
- Schmidt: yes
- Williams: yes
- Cardin: yes
- Holmes: yes
- Morgan, M.: yes
- Shetty: yes
- Wims: yes
- Chang: yes
- Hornberger: yes
- Morgan, T.: yes
- Simmons: yes
- Wivell: yes
- Charkoudian: yes
- Hutchinson: yes
- Nawrocki: yes
- Simpson: yes
- Wolek: yes
- Ciliberti: yes
- Ivey: yes
- Nkongolo: yes
- Smith: yes
- Woods: yes
- Clippinger: yes
- Jacobs: yes
- Odom: yes
- Solomon: yes
- Woorman: yes
- Coley: yes
- Johnson, A.: yes
- Palakovich Carr: yes
- Spiegel: yes
- Wu: yes
- Conaway: yes
- Jones, D.: yes
- Pasteur: yes
- Stein: yes
- Young: yes
- Crutchfield: yes
- Kaiser: yes
- Patterson: yes
- Stewart: yes
- Ziegler: yes
- Cullison: yes
- Addison: not voting
- Bouchat: not voting
- Howard: not voting
- Johnson, S.: not voting
- Wilson: not voting
- Boafo: not voting
- Edelson: not voting
- Baker: absent
- Crosby: absent
- Fair: absent
- Jones, A.: absent
- Long, J.: absent
- Chisholm: absent
- Embry: absent
- Hinebaugh: absent
Related bills
- Companion bill: SB 691
Official source
Attribution
Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T05:23:32.621655Z
Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:
Session-wide evidence can include changes to other bills:
Use this data
Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=MD&identifier=HB 1029. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.
Known limitations
- Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
- Committee referrals are not yet captured.
See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.