SC S 936

in committee

Nuclear Lifecycle Innovation Campus

South Carolina · 2026 Regular Session · upper

Follow this bill’s action updates (Atom)

Subscribe in a feed reader. The feed covers recorded actions from the last 30 days; Bill Commons may record an action after it happened at the legislature.

Quick answers

Did SC S 936 pass?

Not yet. SC S 936 is in committee and has not come to a final vote. Latest recorded action (2026-05-05): Referred to Committee on Labor, Commerce and Industry

What is SC S 936 about?

A JOINT RESOLUTION TO AFFIRM THE COMMITMENT OF THE SOUTH CAROLINA GENERAL ASSEMBLY TO SECURING SOUTH CAROLINA'S ROLE AS THE NATION'S PREMIER HOST FOR A NUCLEAR LIFECYCLE INNOVATION CAMPUS; TO RECOGNIZE SOUTH CAROLINA'S UNMATCHED LEADERSHIP IN NUCLEAR ENERGY, NATIONAL SECURITY, AND ADVANCED MANUFACTURING; AND TO DIRECT A UNIFIED, COMPETITIVE STATE RESPONSE TO THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY'S REQUEST FOR INFORMATION.

Who sponsors SC S 936?

Davis, Young, Garrett and 24 others are the primary sponsors of SC S 936.

Description

Introduced: 2026-02-18
Latest action: 2026-05-05 — Referred to Committee on Labor, Commerce and Industry
Bill type: joint resolution
Last updated: —

Committees

Not provided by source.

Action timeline

Newest first

2026-05-05
Referred to Committee on Labor, Commerce and Industry
referral-committee
2026-05-05
Introduced and read first time
introduction,reading-1
2026-04-30
Read third time and sent to House
passage,reading-3
2026-04-29
Roll call Ayes-42 Nays-0
2026-04-29
Read second time
reading-2
2026-04-29
Amended
amendment-passage
2026-04-28
Recalled from Committee on Judiciary
2026-02-18
Referred to Committee on Judiciary
referral-committee
2026-02-18
Introduced and read first time
introduction,reading-1

Versions

FiledCompare
04/29/2026Compare
04/28/2026Compare
02/18/2026Compare

Documents

Votes

2nd Reading
2026-04-29 · pass · 42-0
Member-level votes (46)
- Adams, Brian: yes
- Alexander, Thomas C.: yes
- Allen, Karl B.: yes
- Bennett, Sean M.: yes
- Blackmon, Allen: yes
- Campsen, George E., III: yes
- Cash, Richard J.: yes
- Chaplin, JD: yes
- Climer, Wes: yes
- Corbin, Thomas D.: yes
- Cromer, Ronnie W.: yes
- Davis, Tom: yes
- Devine, Tameika Isaac: yes
- Elliott, Jason: yes
- Gambrell, Michael W.: yes
- Garrett, Billy: yes
- Graham, Jeffrey R.: yes
- Grooms, Lawrence K.: yes
- Hembree, Greg: yes
- Hutto, Brad: yes
- Jackson, Darrell: yes
- Johnson, Michael: yes
- Kennedy, Carlisle: yes
- Kimbrell, Josh: yes
- Leber, Matthew W.: yes
- Martin, Shane R.: yes
- Massey, A. Shane: yes
- Ott, Russell L.: yes
- Peeler, Harvey S., Jr.: yes
- Rankin, Luke A.: yes
- Reichenbach, Mike: yes
- Rice, Rex F.: yes
- Sabb, Ronnie A.: yes
- Stubbs, Everett: yes
- Sutton, Ed: yes
- Tedder, Deon T.: yes
- Turner, Ross: yes
- Verdin, Daniel B., III: yes
- Walker, Overture: yes
- Williams, Kent M.: yes
- Young, Tom, Jr.: yes
- Zell, Jeff: yes
- Fernandez, Tom: excused
- Goldfinch, Stephen L.: excused
- Matthews, Margie Bright: excused
- Bright, Lee: excused

Related bills

No related bills recorded for this bill.

Official source

https://www.scstatehouse.gov/billsearch.php?billnumbers=936&session=126&summary=B

Attribution

Data from openstates_bulk_csv, retrieved 2026-07-24T05:32:06.227230Z

Inspect retained evidence for changes recorded after evidence tracking began:

Source and document changes Status and relationship changes

Session-wide evidence can include changes to other bills:

Bulk imports for this session Session dates and activity

Use this data

Every field on this page is available from the free public API — no key or licence required. Fetch this bill as JSON: GET /api/v1/bills?jurisdiction=SC&identifier=S 936. See the API docs or the MCP server for AI assistants.

Known limitations

Sponsor party and chamber affiliation are not yet captured by this API.
Committee referrals are not yet captured.

See the methodology page for data sources and limitations.